Identifying optimal technique of reducing dimensionality of scour influencing hydraulic parameters applying SWOT analysis

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Sudarshan Mondal, Buddhadev Nandi, Subhasish Das
{"title":"Identifying optimal technique of reducing dimensionality of scour influencing hydraulic parameters applying SWOT analysis","authors":"Sudarshan Mondal,&nbsp;Buddhadev Nandi,&nbsp;Subhasish Das","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spur dike-like structures (SDLS) are built in rivers to control erosion and reroute water flow. Predicting scour depth around SDLS is essential for structural stability, environmental protection, and public safety, depending on riverbed conditions, geometry, sediment properties, flow velocity, and many other parameters. Feature reduction simplifies modeling, improves computational efficiency and focuses on key variables influencing scour depth. To enhance feature reduction, this paper presents a systematically validated framework using dimensional analysis and 13 state-of-the-art dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques. First, dimensional analysis identifies key parameters, followed by using various DR techniques to reduce features. By methodical testing and assessment, the best DR strategies are determined. A SWOT analysis is performed to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with each DR technique. According to SWOT analysis, subset regression analysis (SSR) emerges as the optimal DR technique compared to others, both quantitatively and qualitatively. According to quantitative evaluation, SSR outperforms Principal component analysis (PCA) (61.2 %) and Discriminant analysis (DA) (18.33 %), achieving the highest weighted mean percentage (70 %) among all. Furthermore, SSR excels by its ability to reduce computational complexity while maintaining high predictive accuracy. The efficiency and robustness of SSR are further supported by its low standard error of 0.21 and optimal selection of predictors, ensuring reduced computational demands without compromising accuracy. This strategic assessment provides in-depth insights into the technical effectiveness and practical viability of DR techniques. Through dimensional analysis and evaluating DR techniques, this study advances feature reduction methods for improved decision-making in fields like scouring around SDLS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"272 ","pages":"Article 126829"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425004518","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spur dike-like structures (SDLS) are built in rivers to control erosion and reroute water flow. Predicting scour depth around SDLS is essential for structural stability, environmental protection, and public safety, depending on riverbed conditions, geometry, sediment properties, flow velocity, and many other parameters. Feature reduction simplifies modeling, improves computational efficiency and focuses on key variables influencing scour depth. To enhance feature reduction, this paper presents a systematically validated framework using dimensional analysis and 13 state-of-the-art dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques. First, dimensional analysis identifies key parameters, followed by using various DR techniques to reduce features. By methodical testing and assessment, the best DR strategies are determined. A SWOT analysis is performed to evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with each DR technique. According to SWOT analysis, subset regression analysis (SSR) emerges as the optimal DR technique compared to others, both quantitatively and qualitatively. According to quantitative evaluation, SSR outperforms Principal component analysis (PCA) (61.2 %) and Discriminant analysis (DA) (18.33 %), achieving the highest weighted mean percentage (70 %) among all. Furthermore, SSR excels by its ability to reduce computational complexity while maintaining high predictive accuracy. The efficiency and robustness of SSR are further supported by its low standard error of 0.21 and optimal selection of predictors, ensuring reduced computational demands without compromising accuracy. This strategic assessment provides in-depth insights into the technical effectiveness and practical viability of DR techniques. Through dimensional analysis and evaluating DR techniques, this study advances feature reduction methods for improved decision-making in fields like scouring around SDLS.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信