Afforestation on Nordic grasslands: Trade-offs and synergies for climate mitigation, biodiversity, and ecosystem services

Iulie Aslaksen , Anders Bryn , Karina Clemmensen , Heleen De Wit , Urban Emanuelsson , Per Arild Garnåsjordet , Solveig Glomsrød , Maximo Graesse , Kristine Grimsrud , Jon Gudmundsson , Margaret Eide Hillestad , Bjart Holtsmark , Endre Kildal Iversen , Paul Kardol , Karl-Ivar Kumm , Tommy Lennartsson , Henrik Lindhjem , Ann Norderhaug , Ulrika Palme , Johan Stendahl , Anna Gudrun Thorhallsdottir
{"title":"Afforestation on Nordic grasslands: Trade-offs and synergies for climate mitigation, biodiversity, and ecosystem services","authors":"Iulie Aslaksen ,&nbsp;Anders Bryn ,&nbsp;Karina Clemmensen ,&nbsp;Heleen De Wit ,&nbsp;Urban Emanuelsson ,&nbsp;Per Arild Garnåsjordet ,&nbsp;Solveig Glomsrød ,&nbsp;Maximo Graesse ,&nbsp;Kristine Grimsrud ,&nbsp;Jon Gudmundsson ,&nbsp;Margaret Eide Hillestad ,&nbsp;Bjart Holtsmark ,&nbsp;Endre Kildal Iversen ,&nbsp;Paul Kardol ,&nbsp;Karl-Ivar Kumm ,&nbsp;Tommy Lennartsson ,&nbsp;Henrik Lindhjem ,&nbsp;Ann Norderhaug ,&nbsp;Ulrika Palme ,&nbsp;Johan Stendahl ,&nbsp;Anna Gudrun Thorhallsdottir","doi":"10.1016/j.gecadv.2025.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Afforestation of abandoned grasslands has been proposed as a global climate mitigation strategy, but the climate benefits of tree planting on grasslands remain contentious. Studies worldwide indicate that grassland soils have large potential for carbon storage, while semi-natural grasslands often support high biodiversity and provide multiple ecosystem services, including grazing resources, pollinator habitats, and aesthetic landscape values. In boreal and alpine regions of the Nordic countries, grasslands sustain extensive low intensity farming, contributing to milk and meat production and enhancing food self-sufficiency. Evaluating the impact of afforestation on climate mitigation requires a comprehensive assessment that, in addition to the carbon balance, considers both geophysical forcing (such as albedo and evapotranspiration) and the broader landscape-level effects on biodiversity in displaced ecosystems. The article postulates for policy to be inclusive of both biodiversity preservation and climate change mitigation. Such an approach should be grounded in evidence-based assessments of the ecological and climate-related impacts of afforestation on the biodiversity of semi-natural grasslands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100586,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Advances","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950138525000038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Afforestation of abandoned grasslands has been proposed as a global climate mitigation strategy, but the climate benefits of tree planting on grasslands remain contentious. Studies worldwide indicate that grassland soils have large potential for carbon storage, while semi-natural grasslands often support high biodiversity and provide multiple ecosystem services, including grazing resources, pollinator habitats, and aesthetic landscape values. In boreal and alpine regions of the Nordic countries, grasslands sustain extensive low intensity farming, contributing to milk and meat production and enhancing food self-sufficiency. Evaluating the impact of afforestation on climate mitigation requires a comprehensive assessment that, in addition to the carbon balance, considers both geophysical forcing (such as albedo and evapotranspiration) and the broader landscape-level effects on biodiversity in displaced ecosystems. The article postulates for policy to be inclusive of both biodiversity preservation and climate change mitigation. Such an approach should be grounded in evidence-based assessments of the ecological and climate-related impacts of afforestation on the biodiversity of semi-natural grasslands.
北欧草原造林:减缓气候变化、生物多样性和生态系统服务的权衡与协同作用
在废弃草原上植树造林已被提出作为一项全球气候减缓战略,但在草原上植树的气候效益仍存在争议。世界范围内的研究表明,草地土壤具有巨大的碳储存潜力,而半天然草地通常支持高生物多样性,并提供多种生态系统服务,包括放牧资源、传粉者栖息地和景观美学价值。在北欧国家的寒带和高山地区,草原维持着广泛的低强度农业,有助于牛奶和肉类生产,并提高粮食自给自足。评价造林对减缓气候变化的影响需要进行全面的评估,除了考虑碳平衡外,还要考虑地球物理强迫(如反照率和蒸散)和对流离失所生态系统中生物多样性的更广泛的景观影响。文章假定政策应包括生物多样性保护和减缓气候变化。这种方法应以基于证据的评估为基础,评估造林对半自然草原生物多样性的生态和气候相关影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信