Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the 0/1-hour algorithm for cardiac troponins in emergency primary care: the OUT-ACS implementation study.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tonje R Johannessen, Sven Eirik Ruud, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Dan Atar, Sigrun Halvorsen, Beate Nilsen, Odd Martin Vallersnes
{"title":"Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the 0/1-hour algorithm for cardiac troponins in emergency primary care: the OUT-ACS implementation study.","authors":"Tonje R Johannessen, Sven Eirik Ruud, Anne Cecilie K Larstorp, Dan Atar, Sigrun Halvorsen, Beate Nilsen, Odd Martin Vallersnes","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02723-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute chest pain has a high hospital referral rate due to the limited ability to exclude acute myocardial infarction (MI) in primary care. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour algorithm for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) testing in emergency primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study (April-October 2023), the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm for hs-cTnT was implemented at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. All consecutive patients ≥ 18 years with acute non-traumatic chest pain having hs-cTnT measurements done were registered. The patients were assigned to MI rule-out, rule-in, or further observation using the algorithm. Patients in the observation group had a 4-hour hs-cTnT measurement done. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients conclusively assessed by the protocol, personnel adherence, reduction in length of stay (LOS) compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol (historical cohort), and disposition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During six months, hs-cTnT measurements were conducted in 32.6% (995/3053) of chest pain patients (median age 58 years (IQR 45-68); 50.6% female). A single hs-cTnT measurement assigned 24.1% (n = 240/995) towards MI rule-out, suitable for early discharge, increasing to 63.8% after adding a 1-hour measurement. The observation group (319/995, 32.1%) was reduced to 23.0% (229/995) after a 4-hour measurement. A total of 77.0% of the patients were conclusively assigned to either rule-out or rule-in group. The personnel adhered well to the new protocol, with a median 1-hour sampling interval of 63 min (IQR 60-66) and 4.6 h (IQR 4.1-5.5) for the 4-hour sample. The protocol was misinterpreted or overruled in 8.6% of the cases. Compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol, LOS was reduced by -2.2 h (95% confidence intervals - 2.6 to -1.7). After completed assessment at the clinic, 14.8% were transferred to hospital, where 20 patients were diagnosed with an MI. The remaining patients were sent home or managed in the outpatient setting; any occurrence of MIs in this group is unknown.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESC 0/1-hour algorithm effectively assesses low-risk acute chest pain in emergency primary care, reinforcing its gatekeeper role by managing these patients at a lower level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02723-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute chest pain has a high hospital referral rate due to the limited ability to exclude acute myocardial infarction (MI) in primary care. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-hour algorithm for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) testing in emergency primary care.

Methods: In a prospective study (April-October 2023), the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm for hs-cTnT was implemented at the main emergency primary care clinic in Oslo, Norway. All consecutive patients ≥ 18 years with acute non-traumatic chest pain having hs-cTnT measurements done were registered. The patients were assigned to MI rule-out, rule-in, or further observation using the algorithm. Patients in the observation group had a 4-hour hs-cTnT measurement done. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients conclusively assessed by the protocol, personnel adherence, reduction in length of stay (LOS) compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol (historical cohort), and disposition.

Results: During six months, hs-cTnT measurements were conducted in 32.6% (995/3053) of chest pain patients (median age 58 years (IQR 45-68); 50.6% female). A single hs-cTnT measurement assigned 24.1% (n = 240/995) towards MI rule-out, suitable for early discharge, increasing to 63.8% after adding a 1-hour measurement. The observation group (319/995, 32.1%) was reduced to 23.0% (229/995) after a 4-hour measurement. A total of 77.0% of the patients were conclusively assigned to either rule-out or rule-in group. The personnel adhered well to the new protocol, with a median 1-hour sampling interval of 63 min (IQR 60-66) and 4.6 h (IQR 4.1-5.5) for the 4-hour sample. The protocol was misinterpreted or overruled in 8.6% of the cases. Compared to the previous 0/4-hour protocol, LOS was reduced by -2.2 h (95% confidence intervals - 2.6 to -1.7). After completed assessment at the clinic, 14.8% were transferred to hospital, where 20 patients were diagnosed with an MI. The remaining patients were sent home or managed in the outpatient setting; any occurrence of MIs in this group is unknown.

Conclusions: The ESC 0/1-hour algorithm effectively assesses low-risk acute chest pain in emergency primary care, reinforcing its gatekeeper role by managing these patients at a lower level of care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信