A Strategic Approach to Succeed on Clinical Case-Based Multiple-Choice Exams.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20542.2
Animesh Jain, Kunal P Patel, Gita Fleischman, Neva Howard, Kelly Lacy Smith, Meredith Niess, Erin Bakal, Christina L Shenvi
{"title":"A Strategic Approach to Succeed on Clinical Case-Based Multiple-Choice Exams.","authors":"Animesh Jain, Kunal P Patel, Gita Fleischman, Neva Howard, Kelly Lacy Smith, Meredith Niess, Erin Bakal, Christina L Shenvi","doi":"10.12688/mep.20542.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the importance of case-based multiple-choice question (CBMCQ) exams, medical educators rarely discuss strategies to systematically approach these questions, and literature on the topic is limited. Through trial-and-error, many students develop more refined and efficient approaches to answering CBMCQs that help them maximize the application of their knowledge base. In this article we present a structured six-step approach to answering CBMCQs, grounded in dual process theory. We provide strategies for success on CBMCQ-based exams and approaches to challenging question types. We also present tips for helping neurodiverse students. Medical educators can use this structured approach and the related tips to coach students on improving performance on CBMCQ-based exams.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"14 ","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11809150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20542.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of case-based multiple-choice question (CBMCQ) exams, medical educators rarely discuss strategies to systematically approach these questions, and literature on the topic is limited. Through trial-and-error, many students develop more refined and efficient approaches to answering CBMCQs that help them maximize the application of their knowledge base. In this article we present a structured six-step approach to answering CBMCQs, grounded in dual process theory. We provide strategies for success on CBMCQ-based exams and approaches to challenging question types. We also present tips for helping neurodiverse students. Medical educators can use this structured approach and the related tips to coach students on improving performance on CBMCQ-based exams.

临床案例选择题考试成功的策略方法。
尽管基于案例的多项选择题(CBMCQ)考试很重要,但医学教育者很少讨论系统解决这些问题的策略,而且关于该主题的文献也很有限。通过反复试验,许多学生开发出更精细、更有效的方法来回答cbmcq,帮助他们最大限度地应用他们的知识基础。在本文中,我们提出了一个结构化的六步方法来回答cbmcq,以双过程理论为基础。我们提供了在基于cbmcq的考试中取得成功的策略和具有挑战性的问题类型的方法。我们还提出了帮助神经多样性学生的建议。医学教育工作者可以使用这种结构化方法和相关技巧来指导学生提高cbmcq考试的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信