Diabetes apps cannot "stand alone": A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to the continued use of diabetes apps among type 2 diabetes.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yucong Shen, Jingyun Zheng, Lingling Lin, Liyuan Hu, Zhongqiu Lu, Chenchen Gao
{"title":"Diabetes apps cannot \"stand alone\": A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to the continued use of diabetes apps among type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Yucong Shen, Jingyun Zheng, Lingling Lin, Liyuan Hu, Zhongqiu Lu, Chenchen Gao","doi":"10.1177/14604582251317914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diabetes apps have the potential to improve self-management among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and thereby prevent complications. However, premature disengagement of diabetes apps hinders this potential. <b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to identify facilitators of and barriers to the continued use of apps among T2DM patients and to formulate recommendations to enhance patients' adherence to diabetes apps. <b>Design:</b> Qualitative study that followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting. Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. <b>Methods:</b> Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 15 T2DM patients who continued real-world use of a diabetes app over 1 month. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. <b>Results:</b> The results showed that patients were triggered to continue app use by internally directed facilitators (health concerns, need for knowledge, self-conscious emotions) and externally directed facilitators (change in medication, reminders from health professionals). However, app use declined among all participants due to user-specific barriers (increased knowledge and experience, therapeutic inertia, diabetes stigma) and app-specific barriers. Notably, different app-specific barriers were identified in different self-managers: for novice self-managers, the app provided inconsistent information; for competent self-managers, the app provided invalid information and service; and for expert self-managers, the app was no longer being intelligent and new. <b>Conclusions:</b> The success of diabetes app continuance cannot be achieved by diabetes apps alone; rather, diabetes patients, health professionals, medical organizations, regulators, and integration technologies need to be gathered. Consistent, relevant, and current information, timely and continual service, psychological support should be guaranteed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"14604582251317914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251317914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes apps have the potential to improve self-management among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and thereby prevent complications. However, premature disengagement of diabetes apps hinders this potential. Objective: This study aimed to identify facilitators of and barriers to the continued use of apps among T2DM patients and to formulate recommendations to enhance patients' adherence to diabetes apps. Design: Qualitative study that followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting. Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 15 T2DM patients who continued real-world use of a diabetes app over 1 month. Data were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: The results showed that patients were triggered to continue app use by internally directed facilitators (health concerns, need for knowledge, self-conscious emotions) and externally directed facilitators (change in medication, reminders from health professionals). However, app use declined among all participants due to user-specific barriers (increased knowledge and experience, therapeutic inertia, diabetes stigma) and app-specific barriers. Notably, different app-specific barriers were identified in different self-managers: for novice self-managers, the app provided inconsistent information; for competent self-managers, the app provided invalid information and service; and for expert self-managers, the app was no longer being intelligent and new. Conclusions: The success of diabetes app continuance cannot be achieved by diabetes apps alone; rather, diabetes patients, health professionals, medical organizations, regulators, and integration technologies need to be gathered. Consistent, relevant, and current information, timely and continual service, psychological support should be guaranteed.

糖尿病应用程序不能“独立”:一项关于2型糖尿病患者继续使用糖尿病应用程序的促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
背景:糖尿病应用程序有可能改善2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的自我管理,从而预防并发症。然而,过早脱离糖尿病应用程序阻碍了这一潜力。目的:本研究旨在确定T2DM患者持续使用app的促进因素和障碍,并制定建议,以提高患者对糖尿病app的依从性。设计:遵循综合报告标准的定性研究。定性研究(COREQ)指南。方法:对15名持续使用糖尿病应用程序超过1个月的T2DM患者进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用常规内容分析。结果:结果显示,内部引导的促进因素(健康问题、知识需求、自我意识情绪)和外部引导的促进因素(药物变化、卫生专业人员的提醒)触发了患者继续使用app。然而,由于用户特有的障碍(知识和经验的增加、治疗惰性、糖尿病耻辱感)和应用特有的障碍,所有参与者的应用使用率都有所下降。值得注意的是,不同的自我管理者发现了不同的应用程序特定障碍:对于新手自我管理者,应用程序提供的信息不一致;对于有能力的自我管理者,app提供的信息和服务无效;对于专业的自我管理者来说,这款应用不再是智能的、新颖的。结论:糖尿病app延续的成功不能单靠糖尿病app实现;相反,需要将糖尿病患者、卫生专业人员、医疗机构、监管机构和集成技术聚集在一起。信息的一致性、相关性和时效性,服务的及时性和持续性,心理支持应得到保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信