Patients Undergoing Multilevel Thoracolumbar Fusions With Prior Total Hip Arthroplasty Are at Higher Risk for Prosthetic Dislocations.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Khoa S Tran, Mark J Lambrechts, Yunsoo Lee, Jonathan Ledesma, Sandy Li, Michael Meghpara, Tristan B Fried, Luke Kowal, Hamd Mahmood, Tariq Z Issa, Olivia Opara, Ashley Wong, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, D Greg Anderson, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder
{"title":"Patients Undergoing Multilevel Thoracolumbar Fusions With Prior Total Hip Arthroplasty Are at Higher Risk for Prosthetic Dislocations.","authors":"Khoa S Tran, Mark J Lambrechts, Yunsoo Lee, Jonathan Ledesma, Sandy Li, Michael Meghpara, Tristan B Fried, Luke Kowal, Hamd Mahmood, Tariq Z Issa, Olivia Opara, Ashley Wong, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, D Greg Anderson, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher K Kepler, Gregory D Schroeder","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the number of patients undergoing both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion rises, clinicians must gain a stronger understanding of the biomechanical and clinical associations between these two procedures. This study compared single versus multilevel spinal fusion on spinopelvic parameters, clinical outcomes, and THA dislocation rates in patients with existing THAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with an existing THA undergoing elective spinal fusion were retrospectively identified at a single academic center. Cohorts were stratified by fusion construct length (single or multilevel) and outcomes were followed at least 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 392 patients (260 single level, 132 multilevel) were included. Patients who underwent multilevel fusion had less improvement in ∆ visual analogue scale (VAS) Back Scores at 1 year (-1.00 vs. -2.50, P = 0.039), greater hospital length of stay (5.00 vs. 3.00 days, P < 0.001), and lower rates of discharge home (48.5% vs. 81.4%, P < 0.001). They had higher dislocation (4.55% vs. 0.38%, P = 0.007), spinal revision (25.8% vs. 13.5%, P = 0.004), and 90-day readmission rates (12.1% vs. 3.46%, P = 0.002). Radiographically, patients with multilevel constructs had lower preoperative (40.4° vs. 49.1°, P < 0.001), postoperative (43.4° vs. 48.6°, P = 0.004), and 1-year lumbar lordosis (44.4° vs. 50.5°, P = 0.028) and higher postoperative mean anteversion (24.2° vs. 21.0°, P = 0.017). Single-level fusion was an independent predictor for lower VAS leg scores (odds ratio [OR] = -2.57, P = 0.011), fewer readmissions (OR = -0.13, P = 0.001), and fewer complications (OR = -0.25, P < 0.001). Male sex independently predicted increased spinal revisions (OR = 0.13, P = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with prior THA undergoing multilevel fusions experienced more dislocations, higher spinal revisions, less frequent discharge home, longer hospital length of stays, and higher 90-day readmission rates. They had less improvement in ∆VAS Back Scores at 1 year, lower lumbar lordosis, and greater anteversion. Patients with existing THA undergoing multilevel fusion have more abnormal spinal sagittal balance and higher risk of dislocation despite higher baseline and postoperative acetabular anteversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the number of patients undergoing both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and lumbar spinal fusion rises, clinicians must gain a stronger understanding of the biomechanical and clinical associations between these two procedures. This study compared single versus multilevel spinal fusion on spinopelvic parameters, clinical outcomes, and THA dislocation rates in patients with existing THAs.

Methods: Patients with an existing THA undergoing elective spinal fusion were retrospectively identified at a single academic center. Cohorts were stratified by fusion construct length (single or multilevel) and outcomes were followed at least 1 year after surgery.

Results: A total of 392 patients (260 single level, 132 multilevel) were included. Patients who underwent multilevel fusion had less improvement in ∆ visual analogue scale (VAS) Back Scores at 1 year (-1.00 vs. -2.50, P = 0.039), greater hospital length of stay (5.00 vs. 3.00 days, P < 0.001), and lower rates of discharge home (48.5% vs. 81.4%, P < 0.001). They had higher dislocation (4.55% vs. 0.38%, P = 0.007), spinal revision (25.8% vs. 13.5%, P = 0.004), and 90-day readmission rates (12.1% vs. 3.46%, P = 0.002). Radiographically, patients with multilevel constructs had lower preoperative (40.4° vs. 49.1°, P < 0.001), postoperative (43.4° vs. 48.6°, P = 0.004), and 1-year lumbar lordosis (44.4° vs. 50.5°, P = 0.028) and higher postoperative mean anteversion (24.2° vs. 21.0°, P = 0.017). Single-level fusion was an independent predictor for lower VAS leg scores (odds ratio [OR] = -2.57, P = 0.011), fewer readmissions (OR = -0.13, P = 0.001), and fewer complications (OR = -0.25, P < 0.001). Male sex independently predicted increased spinal revisions (OR = 0.13, P = 0.026).

Conclusion: Patients with prior THA undergoing multilevel fusions experienced more dislocations, higher spinal revisions, less frequent discharge home, longer hospital length of stays, and higher 90-day readmission rates. They had less improvement in ∆VAS Back Scores at 1 year, lower lumbar lordosis, and greater anteversion. Patients with existing THA undergoing multilevel fusion have more abnormal spinal sagittal balance and higher risk of dislocation despite higher baseline and postoperative acetabular anteversion.

背景:随着同时接受全髋关节置换术(THA)和腰椎融合术的患者人数增加,临床医生必须更深入地了解这两种手术之间的生物力学和临床关联。本研究比较了单层脊柱融合术和多层脊柱融合术对现有THA患者脊柱骨盆参数、临床疗效和THA脱位率的影响:方法:在一个学术中心对接受择期脊柱融合术的现有THA患者进行回顾性鉴定。根据融合结构长度(单层或多层)对组群进行分层,并在术后至少 1 年对结果进行随访:结果:共纳入 392 例患者(260 例单层次,132 例多层次)。接受多层次融合术的患者在术后一年的∆视觉模拟量表(VAS)背部评分改善较小(-1.00 对 -2.50,P = 0.039),住院时间较长(5.00 对 3.00 天,P < 0.001),出院回家率较低(48.5% 对 81.4%,P < 0.001)。他们的脱位率(4.55% 对 0.38%,P = 0.007)、脊柱翻修率(25.8% 对 13.5%,P = 0.004)和 90 天再入院率(12.1% 对 3.46%,P = 0.002)均较高。从影像学角度看,多椎间融合患者的术前(40.4° vs. 49.1°,P < 0.001)、术后(43.4° vs. 48.6°,P = 0.004)和1年腰椎前凸(44.4° vs. 50.5°,P = 0.028)均较低,术后平均前凸(24.2° vs. 21.0°,P = 0.017)较高。单水平融合术可独立预测较低的 VAS 腿部评分(几率比 [OR] = -2.57,P = 0.011)、较少的再住院率(OR = -0.13,P = 0.001)和较少的并发症(OR = -0.25,P < 0.001)。男性是脊柱翻修率增加的独立预测因素(OR = 0.13,P = 0.026):结论:既往接受过THA的患者在接受多椎间融合术后,脱位次数增多,脊柱翻修次数增加,出院回家次数减少,住院时间延长,90天再入院率升高。他们在一年后的∆VAS背部评分改善较少,腰椎前凸较低,前凸程度较大。尽管基线和术后髋臼内翻程度较高,但接受多级融合术的现有 THA 患者的脊柱矢状面平衡更不正常,脱位风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信