Examining the construct validity of posttraumatic growth following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: A mixed-methods analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Stephanie Agtarap, Mackenzie Peckham, Marissa Lundstern, Steve Bistricky, Adriel Boals, Jennifer Gallagher, Robin Hanks, Daniel W Klyce, Paul B Perrin
{"title":"Examining the construct validity of posttraumatic growth following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury: A mixed-methods analysis.","authors":"Stephanie Agtarap, Mackenzie Peckham, Marissa Lundstern, Steve Bistricky, Adriel Boals, Jennifer Gallagher, Robin Hanks, Daniel W Klyce, Paul B Perrin","doi":"10.1037/rep0000596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Posttraumatic growth (PTG) refers to positive changes that individuals experience in the wake of a stressful or traumatic event. Though growth and adaptation are considered ideal outcomes of rehabilitation, the extent to which PTG captures the unique experience of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has not been empirically evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to establish construct validity of PTG for individuals following moderate-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Research method: </strong>Forty participants who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation services for moderate-severe TBI and who were > 1 year postinjury completed a one-time phone interview of mental health and quality of life assessments, and answered a free-response question about significant life changes after injury. Using convergent parallel design, scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) were compared to other assessments and themes of PTG and posttraumatic depreciation derived through thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PTGI total scores (<i>M</i> = 66.60, <i>SD</i> = 21.79) were similar to other brain injury populations respective to time since injury (<i>M</i> = 11.20 years). Qualitatively derived themes of PTG aligned with domains of the PTGI, and endorsement of PTG was significantly associated with greater mental health and social support.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides evidence of the existence of PTG and posttraumatic depreciation in a sample of individuals with moderate-severe TBI, supporting its construct validity using mixed-methods data. Our findings may be helpful in identifying what significant changes may indicate significant growth and depreciation during the rehabilitation process, and be critical mechanisms for optimal psychosocial adjustment following brain injury. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: Posttraumatic growth (PTG) refers to positive changes that individuals experience in the wake of a stressful or traumatic event. Though growth and adaptation are considered ideal outcomes of rehabilitation, the extent to which PTG captures the unique experience of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has not been empirically evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to establish construct validity of PTG for individuals following moderate-severe TBI.

Research method: Forty participants who received inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation services for moderate-severe TBI and who were > 1 year postinjury completed a one-time phone interview of mental health and quality of life assessments, and answered a free-response question about significant life changes after injury. Using convergent parallel design, scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) were compared to other assessments and themes of PTG and posttraumatic depreciation derived through thematic analysis.

Results: PTGI total scores (M = 66.60, SD = 21.79) were similar to other brain injury populations respective to time since injury (M = 11.20 years). Qualitatively derived themes of PTG aligned with domains of the PTGI, and endorsement of PTG was significantly associated with greater mental health and social support.

Discussion: This study provides evidence of the existence of PTG and posttraumatic depreciation in a sample of individuals with moderate-severe TBI, supporting its construct validity using mixed-methods data. Our findings may be helpful in identifying what significant changes may indicate significant growth and depreciation during the rehabilitation process, and be critical mechanisms for optimal psychosocial adjustment following brain injury. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信