Risk factors for valgus subsidence in uncemented medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexander Gallant, Pieter-Jan Vandekerckhove, Lucas Beckers, Arne De Smet, Cedric Depuydt, Jan Victor, François Hardeman
{"title":"Risk factors for valgus subsidence in uncemented medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Alexander Gallant, Pieter-Jan Vandekerckhove, Lucas Beckers, Arne De Smet, Cedric Depuydt, Jan Victor, François Hardeman","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0161.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Valgus subsidence of uncemented tibial components following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) poses a challenge in the early postoperative phase, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its prevalence, risk factors, and impact on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicentre study analyzed 97 knees from 90 patients undergoing UKA across four participating hospitals. A standardized surgical technique was employed uniformly by all participating surgeons. Postoperative evaluations were conducted preoperatively, and one day, four weeks, three months, and one year postoperative, encompassing weightbearing radiographs, bone mineral density assessments, and clinical outcome reports using the Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score. Statistical analyses, including non-parametric correlation analysis using the Kendall correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test, were performed to explore associations between subsidence and various patient-related or radiological parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight patients showed more than 2° valgus subsidence (8.2%), higher than previously reported rates. There were significant correlations between subsidence and higher preoperative varus alignment of the tibia, larger adaptation of the preoperative varus to a postoperative neutral or valgus alignment, mediolateral undersizing of the tibial component, excessive lateral load of tibial component by more lateral position of femoral component relative to tibial component, a lower T-score, and female sex. Our study found no significant difference in pain scores between subsidence and non-subsidence groups at various postoperative milestones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings corroborate earlier suggested risk factors based on biomechanical models. Further research might provide the opportunity to identify high-risk groups preoperatively and adapt treatment strategies for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 2","pages":"178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0161.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Valgus subsidence of uncemented tibial components following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) poses a challenge in the early postoperative phase, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its prevalence, risk factors, and impact on patient outcomes.

Methods: This prospective multicentre study analyzed 97 knees from 90 patients undergoing UKA across four participating hospitals. A standardized surgical technique was employed uniformly by all participating surgeons. Postoperative evaluations were conducted preoperatively, and one day, four weeks, three months, and one year postoperative, encompassing weightbearing radiographs, bone mineral density assessments, and clinical outcome reports using the Forgotten Joint Score and Oxford Knee Score. Statistical analyses, including non-parametric correlation analysis using the Kendall correlation coefficient and Mann-Whitney U test, were performed to explore associations between subsidence and various patient-related or radiological parameters.

Results: A total of eight patients showed more than 2° valgus subsidence (8.2%), higher than previously reported rates. There were significant correlations between subsidence and higher preoperative varus alignment of the tibia, larger adaptation of the preoperative varus to a postoperative neutral or valgus alignment, mediolateral undersizing of the tibial component, excessive lateral load of tibial component by more lateral position of femoral component relative to tibial component, a lower T-score, and female sex. Our study found no significant difference in pain scores between subsidence and non-subsidence groups at various postoperative milestones.

Conclusion: These findings corroborate earlier suggested risk factors based on biomechanical models. Further research might provide the opportunity to identify high-risk groups preoperatively and adapt treatment strategies for these patients.

非骨水泥内侧单面膝关节置换术中外翻下陷的危险因素。
目的:内侧单室膝关节置换术(UKA)后未骨水泥胫骨构件外翻下陷在术后早期提出了挑战,需要全面了解其患病率、危险因素和对患者预后的影响。方法:这项前瞻性多中心研究分析了来自四家参与医院的90例UKA患者的97个膝关节。所有参与的外科医生统一采用标准化的手术技术。术前、术后1天、4周、3个月和1年进行术后评估,包括负重x线片、骨密度评估以及使用遗忘关节评分和牛津膝关节评分的临床结果报告。统计分析包括使用Kendall相关系数和Mann-Whitney U检验的非参数相关分析,以探索沉降与各种患者相关参数或放射学参数之间的关系。结果:8例患者外翻下陷超过2°(8.2%),高于既往报道。下沉与术前胫骨内翻对齐程度较高、术前内翻对术后中性或外翻对齐的适应程度较高、胫骨内外侧尺寸过小、股骨相对胫骨外侧位置较外侧导致胫骨外侧负荷过大、t评分较低以及女性之间存在显著相关性。我们的研究发现,在不同的术后里程碑,沉陷组和非沉陷组的疼痛评分没有显著差异。结论:这些发现证实了早期基于生物力学模型提出的危险因素。进一步的研究可能为术前确定高危人群和调整治疗策略提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信