Impact of a POCUS-first versus CT-first approach on emergency department length of stay and time to surgical consultation in patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Chien-Tai Huang, Liang-Wei Wang, Shao-Yung Lin, Tai-Yuan Chen, Yi-Ju Ho, Pei-Hsiu Wang, Kao-Lang Liu, Yao-Ming Wu, Hsiu-Po Wang, Wan-Ching Lien
{"title":"Impact of a POCUS-first versus CT-first approach on emergency department length of stay and time to surgical consultation in patients with acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study.","authors":"Chien-Tai Huang, Liang-Wei Wang, Shao-Yung Lin, Tai-Yuan Chen, Yi-Ju Ho, Pei-Hsiu Wang, Kao-Lang Liu, Yao-Ming Wu, Hsiu-Po Wang, Wan-Ching Lien","doi":"10.1186/s13049-025-01341-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) and computed tomography (CT) on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and time to surgical consultation in patients with mild acute cholecystitis (AC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with CT-confirmed grade I AC were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the PoCUS-first group and the CT-first group. The primary outcome was the relationship between the door-to-ultrasound (US)/CT time and ED-LOS. The secondary outcome was the relationship between the door-to-US/CT time and time to surgical consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1627 patients were included with 264 in the PoCUS first group. In the PoCUS group, door-to-US time was positively associated with ED-LOS (β = 0.27, p < 0.001) and time to surgical consultation (β = 0.36, p < 0.001). Similarly, door-to-CT time was also positively associated with ED-LOS (β = 0.21, p < 0.001) and time to surgical consultation (β = 0.75, p < 0.001) in the CT group. Conducting PoCUS within 60 min was associated with a reduced ED-LOS and time to surgical consultation, resulting in a saving of 22.4 h and 266 min, respectively. In the CT group, performing CT within 120 min was associated with a reduced ED-LOS and time to surgical consultation, resulting in a decrease of 12 h and 188 min, respectively. The ED-LOS and time to surgical consultation were similar between patients receiving PoCUS within 60 min in PoCUS group and those receiving CT within 120 min in the CT group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing PoCUS within 60 min or CT within 120 min was associated with shorter ED-LOS and earlier surgical consultation, enhancing the ED efficiency in patients with mild AC.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT04149041 at ClinicalTrial.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-025-01341-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) and computed tomography (CT) on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and time to surgical consultation in patients with mild acute cholecystitis (AC).

Methods: Adult patients with CT-confirmed grade I AC were retrospectively enrolled and divided into the PoCUS-first group and the CT-first group. The primary outcome was the relationship between the door-to-ultrasound (US)/CT time and ED-LOS. The secondary outcome was the relationship between the door-to-US/CT time and time to surgical consultation.

Results: A total of 1627 patients were included with 264 in the PoCUS first group. In the PoCUS group, door-to-US time was positively associated with ED-LOS (β = 0.27, p < 0.001) and time to surgical consultation (β = 0.36, p < 0.001). Similarly, door-to-CT time was also positively associated with ED-LOS (β = 0.21, p < 0.001) and time to surgical consultation (β = 0.75, p < 0.001) in the CT group. Conducting PoCUS within 60 min was associated with a reduced ED-LOS and time to surgical consultation, resulting in a saving of 22.4 h and 266 min, respectively. In the CT group, performing CT within 120 min was associated with a reduced ED-LOS and time to surgical consultation, resulting in a decrease of 12 h and 188 min, respectively. The ED-LOS and time to surgical consultation were similar between patients receiving PoCUS within 60 min in PoCUS group and those receiving CT within 120 min in the CT group.

Conclusions: Performing PoCUS within 60 min or CT within 120 min was associated with shorter ED-LOS and earlier surgical consultation, enhancing the ED efficiency in patients with mild AC.

Trial registration: NCT04149041 at ClinicalTrial.gov.

急性胆囊炎患者采用pocus优先与ct优先对急诊科住院时间和手术会诊时间的影响:回顾性研究
目的:本研究旨在评估即时超声(PoCUS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)对轻度急性胆囊炎(AC)患者急诊科(ED)住院时间(LOS)和手术会诊时间的影响。方法:回顾性纳入成年ct确诊的I级AC患者,分为PoCUS-first组和CT-first组。主要结局是门到超声(US)/CT时间与ED-LOS的关系。次要结果是门到us /CT时间与手术会诊时间之间的关系。结果:共纳入患者1627例,其中PoCUS第一组264例。结论:在60分钟内进行PoCUS或在120分钟内进行CT与更短的ED- los和更早的手术咨询相关,提高了轻度ac患者的ED效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信