Atrial Fibrillation in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Survey of Current Management in Australia and New Zealand.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1111/nep.14422
Mandy M Law, Sven-Jean Tan, Michael C G Wong, Nigel D Toussaint
{"title":"Atrial Fibrillation in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Survey of Current Management in Australia and New Zealand.","authors":"Mandy M Law, Sven-Jean Tan, Michael C G Wong, Nigel D Toussaint","doi":"10.1111/nep.14422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>There is limited evidence to support the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in people with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to characterise the practice patterns and priorities of clinicians in the management of non-valvular AF and primary prevention of AF-related stroke in people with stage 4-5D CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an annonymous, multiple-choice, electronic survey distributed to and undertaken by nephrology and cardiology clinicians in Australia and New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses eligible for analysis were received from 181 clinicians (121 nephrology and 60 cardiology respondents). Management with close specialty collaboration was reported by 47% of all respondents. OAC use was predominantly based on estimated individual stroke risk (i.e., CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score) in people with stage 4 CKD and kidney transplant recipients. In stage 5/5D CKD, nephrology respondents were more likely to withhold all antithrombotic therapy or individualise OAC use (p < 0.05), whilst cardiology respondents were more likely to defer OAC decision-making to another specialist (p < 0.01). Varied use and dosing of OAC agents were noted between specialties. Left atrial appendage occlusion experience was limited amongst nephrology respondents but cardiology respondents would consider in individualised cases. Impact of CKD severity was noted in some rate and/or rhythm control management decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey provides important contemporary insights into the management of AF in people with advanced CKD in Australia and New Zealand. There was inter- and intra-specialty heterogeneity in practice, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care and research to improve cardiovascular outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19264,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology","volume":"30 2","pages":"e14422"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.14422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: There is limited evidence to support the use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in people with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study is to characterise the practice patterns and priorities of clinicians in the management of non-valvular AF and primary prevention of AF-related stroke in people with stage 4-5D CKD.

Methods: This was an annonymous, multiple-choice, electronic survey distributed to and undertaken by nephrology and cardiology clinicians in Australia and New Zealand.

Results: Responses eligible for analysis were received from 181 clinicians (121 nephrology and 60 cardiology respondents). Management with close specialty collaboration was reported by 47% of all respondents. OAC use was predominantly based on estimated individual stroke risk (i.e., CHA2DS2-VASc score) in people with stage 4 CKD and kidney transplant recipients. In stage 5/5D CKD, nephrology respondents were more likely to withhold all antithrombotic therapy or individualise OAC use (p < 0.05), whilst cardiology respondents were more likely to defer OAC decision-making to another specialist (p < 0.01). Varied use and dosing of OAC agents were noted between specialties. Left atrial appendage occlusion experience was limited amongst nephrology respondents but cardiology respondents would consider in individualised cases. Impact of CKD severity was noted in some rate and/or rhythm control management decisions.

Conclusions: This survey provides important contemporary insights into the management of AF in people with advanced CKD in Australia and New Zealand. There was inter- and intra-specialty heterogeneity in practice, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care and research to improve cardiovascular outcomes in this population.

房颤在晚期慢性肾脏疾病:澳大利亚和新西兰目前的管理调查。
目的:有有限的证据支持口服抗凝剂(OAC)用于晚期慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和心房颤动(AF)患者。本研究的目的是描述临床医生在4-5D期CKD患者非瓣膜性房颤管理和房颤相关卒中一级预防方面的实践模式和优先事项。方法:这是一项匿名、多项选择、电子调查,由澳大利亚和新西兰的肾病学和心脏病学临床医生进行。结果:181名临床医生(121名肾脏病专家和60名心脏病专家)的回复符合分析条件。47%的受访者报告了密切专业合作的管理。在4期CKD患者和肾移植受者中,OAC的使用主要基于估计的个体卒中风险(即CHA2DS2-VASc评分)。在5/5D期CKD中,肾病学应答者更有可能拒绝所有抗血栓治疗或个体化使用OAC (p)。结论:这项调查为澳大利亚和新西兰晚期CKD患者房颤的管理提供了重要的当代见解。在实践中存在专业间和专业内的异质性,强调需要多学科护理和研究来改善这一人群的心血管预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephrology
Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nephrology is published eight times per year by the Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology. It has a special emphasis on the needs of Clinical Nephrologists and those in developing countries. The journal publishes reviews and papers of international interest describing original research concerned with clinical and experimental aspects of nephrology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信