Opioid Prescribing Disparity in Traumatically Injured Patients.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Sophia M Smith, Rachel Adams, Emily Ha, Wang Pong Chan, Kendall Jenkins, Cara Michael, Noelle N Saillant, Jeffrey A Franks, Sabrina E Sanchez
{"title":"Opioid Prescribing Disparity in Traumatically Injured Patients.","authors":"Sophia M Smith, Rachel Adams, Emily Ha, Wang Pong Chan, Kendall Jenkins, Cara Michael, Noelle N Saillant, Jeffrey A Franks, Sabrina E Sanchez","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid prescribing is understudied in trauma patients, where disadvantaged communities are overrepresented. In this study, we evaluated disparities in opioid administration after trauma.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured adults at a Level I trauma center, 2018 to 2021. Opioids were quantified in milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs). Primary outcomes were receipt of opioids inpatient and at discharge, MMEs per hospital day, and, for patients prescribed opioids at discharge, MMEs and discharge pain control days. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with overall receipt of opioids after injury, general linear modeling identified factors associated with MMEs received inpatient and at discharge, and negative binomial regression evaluated pain control days prescribed at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,032 patients, 2,514 (82.92%) required opioids as an inpatient and 1,803 (71.72%) still required opioids the day of discharge. Of these, 1,310 (72.66%) were discharged with opioids. Black (β -24.94, 95% CI -37.25 to -12.62, p < 0.001) and Hispanic (β -21.96, 95% CI -39.21 to -4.71, p = 0.01) patients received lower MMEs while inpatient. Factors associated with lower odds of discharge with opioids included non-English language (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.82, p = 0.003), substance use disorder (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.97, p = 0.03), neuropsychiatric comorbidity (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.87, p = 0.008), and violent injury (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85, p = 0.003). On discharge, Black individuals (β -130.71, 95% CI -251.26 to -10.17, p = 0.03) received lower MMEs and patients with substance use disorder (incidence rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.80, p < 0.001) received fewer pain control days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trauma patients experienced disparities in opioid prescribing throughout hospitalization. Lower opioid doses were administered to non-White patients, while language, mental health comorbidity, and mechanism influenced discharge opioid prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"915-925"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid prescribing is understudied in trauma patients, where disadvantaged communities are overrepresented. In this study, we evaluated disparities in opioid administration after trauma.

Study design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured adults at a Level I trauma center, 2018 to 2021. Opioids were quantified in milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs). Primary outcomes were receipt of opioids inpatient and at discharge, MMEs per hospital day, and, for patients prescribed opioids at discharge, MMEs and discharge pain control days. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with overall receipt of opioids after injury, general linear modeling identified factors associated with MMEs received inpatient and at discharge, and negative binomial regression evaluated pain control days prescribed at discharge.

Results: Of 3,032 patients, 2,514 (82.92%) required opioids as an inpatient and 1,803 (71.72%) still required opioids the day of discharge. Of these, 1,310 (72.66%) were discharged with opioids. Black (β -24.94, 95% CI -37.25 to -12.62, p < 0.001) and Hispanic (β -21.96, 95% CI -39.21 to -4.71, p = 0.01) patients received lower MMEs while inpatient. Factors associated with lower odds of discharge with opioids included non-English language (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.82, p = 0.003), substance use disorder (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.97, p = 0.03), neuropsychiatric comorbidity (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.87, p = 0.008), and violent injury (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.85, p = 0.003). On discharge, Black individuals (β -130.71, 95% CI -251.26 to -10.17, p = 0.03) received lower MMEs and patients with substance use disorder (incidence rate ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.80, p < 0.001) received fewer pain control days.

Conclusions: Trauma patients experienced disparities in opioid prescribing throughout hospitalization. Lower opioid doses were administered to non-White patients, while language, mental health comorbidity, and mechanism influenced discharge opioid prescriptions.

创伤性损伤患者阿片类药物处方差异。
背景:阿片类药物处方在创伤患者中的研究不足,其中弱势社区的比例过高。在这项研究中,我们评估了创伤后阿片类药物使用的差异。研究设计:我们对一家一级创伤中心2018-2021年受伤的成年人进行了回顾性队列研究。阿片类药物以毫克吗啡当量(MME)计量。主要结局是住院和出院时阿片类药物的接收,每个住院日的MMEs,以及出院时处方阿片类药物的患者的MMEs和出院疼痛控制日。多变量logistic回归确定了与受伤后阿片类药物总体接收相关的因素,一般线性模型确定了与住院和出院时接受MMEs相关的因素,负二项回归评估了出院时规定的疼痛控制天数。结果:3032例患者中,2514例(82.92%)住院时需要阿片类药物,1803例(71.72%)出院时仍需要阿片类药物。其中1310例(72.66%)因阿片类药物出院。结论:创伤患者在住院期间阿片类药物处方存在差异。对非白人患者给予较低的阿片类药物剂量,而语言、精神健康合并症和机制影响出院阿片类药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信