Clinical performance of Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 rapid molecular point-of-care test compared to three real-time RT-PCR assays.

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02033-24
Maria D Iglesias-Ussel, Aleah Bowie, Jack G Anderson, Yin Li, Lawrence P Park, Jose F Cardona, Patrick Dennis, Valentine Ebuh, Steven A Geller, Manish Jain, Mark M McKenzie, Kian Merchant-Borna, Anand Patel, Amy Siegel, Guy S Strauss, Joby J Thoppil, Aaron S Weinberg, Christopher W Woods
{"title":"Clinical performance of Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 rapid molecular point-of-care test compared to three real-time RT-PCR assays.","authors":"Maria D Iglesias-Ussel, Aleah Bowie, Jack G Anderson, Yin Li, Lawrence P Park, Jose F Cardona, Patrick Dennis, Valentine Ebuh, Steven A Geller, Manish Jain, Mark M McKenzie, Kian Merchant-Borna, Anand Patel, Amy Siegel, Guy S Strauss, Joby J Thoppil, Aaron S Weinberg, Christopher W Woods","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02033-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Timely diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is important for infection control and treatment. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) tests are the reference standard for diagnosis but often require a centralized laboratory, making them time-intensive and unsuitable for resource-limited settings. The Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 assay is a rapid point-of-care (POC), isothermal molecular test for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2. We prospectively evaluated its clinical performance against three reference rRT-PCR tests: Hologic Panther Fusion, Roche Cobas, and CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. Investigators enrolled 3,530 subjects, with 3,146 evaluable. In symptomatic subjects (<i>n</i> = 914), the test showed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.8, 94.4) and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 98.4% (95% CI: 97.1, 99.1). The PPA improved with lower cycle threshold (Ct) values: 94.7% (95% CI: 91.2, 97.2) for Ct ≤36, 97.6% (95% CI: 94.5, 99.2) for Ct ≤33, and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.8, 100.0) for Ct ≤30. Discordant results were observed among the three reference rRT-PCR tests across evaluable subjects with suspected COVID-19 infection. For 1,630 cases of symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects suspected of COVID-19, where all three rRT-PCR methods were evaluable, CDC test results differed the most, with 144 discordant results with Roche and 119 with Panther rRT-PCR tests. Roche and Panther test results differed in 67 cases. In summary, the Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 assay can serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in acute symptomatic subjects in point-of-care settings.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Abbott ID NOW<sup>TM</sup> COVID-19 2.0 assay is a suitable rapid test for diagnosing COVID-19 in acute symptomatic subjects and can be used in point-of-care settings and low-resource settings. With results reported in 12 minutes or less, Abbott ID NOW<sup>TM</sup> COVID-19 2.0 facilitates timely diagnosis, enabling linkage to appropriate antiviral medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0203324"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02033-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Timely diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is important for infection control and treatment. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) tests are the reference standard for diagnosis but often require a centralized laboratory, making them time-intensive and unsuitable for resource-limited settings. The Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 assay is a rapid point-of-care (POC), isothermal molecular test for qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2. We prospectively evaluated its clinical performance against three reference rRT-PCR tests: Hologic Panther Fusion, Roche Cobas, and CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel. Investigators enrolled 3,530 subjects, with 3,146 evaluable. In symptomatic subjects (n = 914), the test showed a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.8, 94.4) and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 98.4% (95% CI: 97.1, 99.1). The PPA improved with lower cycle threshold (Ct) values: 94.7% (95% CI: 91.2, 97.2) for Ct ≤36, 97.6% (95% CI: 94.5, 99.2) for Ct ≤33, and 99.4% (95% CI: 96.8, 100.0) for Ct ≤30. Discordant results were observed among the three reference rRT-PCR tests across evaluable subjects with suspected COVID-19 infection. For 1,630 cases of symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects suspected of COVID-19, where all three rRT-PCR methods were evaluable, CDC test results differed the most, with 144 discordant results with Roche and 119 with Panther rRT-PCR tests. Roche and Panther test results differed in 67 cases. In summary, the Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 assay can serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in acute symptomatic subjects in point-of-care settings.

Importance: The Abbott ID NOWTM COVID-19 2.0 assay is a suitable rapid test for diagnosing COVID-19 in acute symptomatic subjects and can be used in point-of-care settings and low-resource settings. With results reported in 12 minutes or less, Abbott ID NOWTM COVID-19 2.0 facilitates timely diagnosis, enabling linkage to appropriate antiviral medication.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

雅培ID NOW™COVID-19 2.0快速分子护理点检测与三种实时RT-PCR检测的临床性能比较
及时诊断SARS-CoV-2对感染控制和治疗具有重要意义。实时逆转录酶PCR (rRT-PCR)检测是诊断的参考标准,但往往需要一个集中的实验室,这使得它们耗时且不适合资源有限的环境。雅培ID NOW™COVID-19 2.0检测是一种快速护理点(POC)等温分子检测,用于定性检测SARS-CoV-2。我们通过Hologic Panther Fusion、Roche Cobas和CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR诊断面板三种参考rRT-PCR检测前瞻性评估了其临床表现。研究人员招募了3,530名受试者,其中3,146名可评估。在有症状的受试者(n = 914)中,测试显示91.7%的阳性一致性(PPA)(95%置信区间[CI]: 87.8, 94.4)和98.4%的阴性一致性(NPA) (95% CI: 97.1, 99.1)。PPA改善的周期阈值(Ct)值较低:Ct≤36时为94.7% (95% CI: 91.2, 97.2), Ct≤33时为97.6% (95% CI: 94.5, 99.2), Ct≤30时为99.4% (95% CI: 96.8, 100.0)。在疑似COVID-19感染的可评估受试者中,三种参考rRT-PCR检测结果不一致。在1630例疑似COVID-19的有症状和无症状受试者中,所有三种rRT-PCR方法均可评估,CDC检测结果差异最大,与Roche检测结果不一致144例,与Panther检测结果不一致119例。67例患者的Roche和Panther检测结果不同。总之,雅培ID NOW™COVID-19 2.0检测可作为一种有价值的诊断工具,用于即时护理环境中的急性症状受试者。重要性:雅培ID NOWTM COVID-19 2.0检测是诊断急性症状患者COVID-19的合适快速检测方法,可在护理点环境和资源匮乏环境中使用。雅培ID NOWTM COVID-19 2.0可在12分钟或更短时间内报告结果,有助于及时诊断,从而实现适当抗病毒药物的联动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信