{"title":"Comprehensive normalization and binary classification methods for enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility in Luminex assay quantitation","authors":"B.A. Burns , C.A. Shaw , M. Chandra , C.S. Forconi , A.M. Moormann , V. Konduri , V.N. Tubman , W.K. Decker","doi":"10.1016/j.jim.2025.113826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Luminex assay is a powerful tool for large-scale quantitation of antibody levels and cytokines, but its utility can be limited by issues of specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. The corrections for background fluorescence and machine drift are essential steps in the normalization process. However, traditional methods often oversimplify these steps, failing to account for the complexity of the data, leading to the introduction of error and decreasing the sensitivity and reproducibility of the analysis. Furthermore, conventional methods to determine cut-points in binary measures do not consider the true distribution of the data, leading to arbitrary cut-points that compromise the integrity of the analysis. Here, we present a novel approach to normalize Luminex data and split the normalized bimodal data. Our method uses orthogonal regression of the measured fluorescence of a negative control bead and a blank bead to correct for background fluorescence, enhancing accuracy by preventing overcorrection due to cross-reactivity. To account for machine drift, we use a generalized additive model (GAM) on the standard curves to calculate a plate correction, thus reducing error and improving reproducibility. To distinguish between positive and negative results in bimodal measures, we use a clustering analysis to accurately split the data based on distribution. Finally, we developed a web application to easily carry out the developed method. These methods collectively increase sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of Luminex assay data analysis by effectively addressing the limitations of current normalization techniques, correcting for background fluorescence and machine drift, and improving the specificity and accuracy in splitting bimodal data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of immunological methods","volume":"538 ","pages":"Article 113826"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of immunological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022175925000262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Luminex assay is a powerful tool for large-scale quantitation of antibody levels and cytokines, but its utility can be limited by issues of specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. The corrections for background fluorescence and machine drift are essential steps in the normalization process. However, traditional methods often oversimplify these steps, failing to account for the complexity of the data, leading to the introduction of error and decreasing the sensitivity and reproducibility of the analysis. Furthermore, conventional methods to determine cut-points in binary measures do not consider the true distribution of the data, leading to arbitrary cut-points that compromise the integrity of the analysis. Here, we present a novel approach to normalize Luminex data and split the normalized bimodal data. Our method uses orthogonal regression of the measured fluorescence of a negative control bead and a blank bead to correct for background fluorescence, enhancing accuracy by preventing overcorrection due to cross-reactivity. To account for machine drift, we use a generalized additive model (GAM) on the standard curves to calculate a plate correction, thus reducing error and improving reproducibility. To distinguish between positive and negative results in bimodal measures, we use a clustering analysis to accurately split the data based on distribution. Finally, we developed a web application to easily carry out the developed method. These methods collectively increase sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of Luminex assay data analysis by effectively addressing the limitations of current normalization techniques, correcting for background fluorescence and machine drift, and improving the specificity and accuracy in splitting bimodal data.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Immunological Methods is devoted to covering techniques for: (1) Quantitating and detecting antibodies and/or antigens. (2) Purifying immunoglobulins, lymphokines and other molecules of the immune system. (3) Isolating antigens and other substances important in immunological processes. (4) Labelling antigens and antibodies. (5) Localizing antigens and/or antibodies in tissues and cells. (6) Detecting, and fractionating immunocompetent cells. (7) Assaying for cellular immunity. (8) Documenting cell-cell interactions. (9) Initiating immunity and unresponsiveness. (10) Transplanting tissues. (11) Studying items closely related to immunity such as complement, reticuloendothelial system and others. (12) Molecular techniques for studying immune cells and their receptors. (13) Imaging of the immune system. (14) Methods for production or their fragments in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells.
In addition the journal will publish articles on novel methods for analysing the organization, structure and expression of genes for immunologically important molecules such as immunoglobulins, T cell receptors and accessory molecules involved in antigen recognition, processing and presentation. Submitted full length manuscripts should describe new methods of broad applicability to immunology and not simply the application of an established method to a particular substance - although papers describing such applications may be considered for publication as a short Technical Note. Review articles will also be published by the Journal of Immunological Methods. In general these manuscripts are by solicitation however anyone interested in submitting a review can contact the Reviews Editor and provide an outline of the proposed review.