Effects of Home Neighborhood Tree Canopy Coverage on Mental Health Outcomes: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Investigation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shannon B Juengst, Raj G Kumar, Alexandra Holland, Achituv Cohen, Trisalyn A Nelson, John D Corrigan, Angelle M Sander, Paul B Perrin, Umesh M Venkatesan, Amanda Rabinowitz, Simon Driver, Kristin Wilmoth, Candace Tefertiller
{"title":"Effects of Home Neighborhood Tree Canopy Coverage on Mental Health Outcomes: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Investigation.","authors":"Shannon B Juengst, Raj G Kumar, Alexandra Holland, Achituv Cohen, Trisalyn A Nelson, John D Corrigan, Angelle M Sander, Paul B Perrin, Umesh M Venkatesan, Amanda Rabinowitz, Simon Driver, Kristin Wilmoth, Candace Tefertiller","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the relationship between tree canopy coverage (TCC) in one's home neighborhood and mental health outcomes, and how these relationships differ by home neighborhood factors, among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database with completed follow-up interview after January 1, 2017.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Neighborhood (census tract) Percent TCC, depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7) symptoms (scores ≥10 on each measure), personal/demographic (age, sex, education, homebound status), and neighborhood factors (type, socioeconomic disadvantage).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Separate negative binomial regression models were constructed for the 2 mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety symptoms). Covariates in final models were age, sex, neighborhood type, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) total (concurrent), driving status, homebound status, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage. The interaction between Percent TCC and neighborhood type (but not homebound status) was significant for depression and anxiety symptoms. The nature of the significant interaction was such that, for both mental health outcomes, those living in rural neighborhoods with higher Percent TCC were more likely to have moderate to severe mental health symptoms. However, this effect was attenuated after adding neighborhood level socioeconomic disadvantage, suggesting that part of the effect may be due to socioeconomic characteristics of rural versus other neighborhoods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After adjusting for SDoH, the direct effect of TCC on mental health after TBI was small and opposite the direction hypothesized (higher TCC associated with poorer mental health), particularly for those living in rural neighborhoods potentially more likely to experience socioeconomic disadvantage. Our findings highlight the importance of evaluating interactions between different aspects of the social (eg, SDoH), natural (eg, greenspace), and built (eg, neighborhood type) environment to provide a comprehensive understanding of factors affecting health after TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Explore the relationship between tree canopy coverage (TCC) in one's home neighborhood and mental health outcomes, and how these relationships differ by home neighborhood factors, among persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the United States.

Setting: Community.

Participants: Enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database with completed follow-up interview after January 1, 2017.

Design: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional data.

Main measures: Neighborhood (census tract) Percent TCC, depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder-7) symptoms (scores ≥10 on each measure), personal/demographic (age, sex, education, homebound status), and neighborhood factors (type, socioeconomic disadvantage).

Results: Separate negative binomial regression models were constructed for the 2 mental health outcomes (depression and anxiety symptoms). Covariates in final models were age, sex, neighborhood type, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) total (concurrent), driving status, homebound status, and neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage. The interaction between Percent TCC and neighborhood type (but not homebound status) was significant for depression and anxiety symptoms. The nature of the significant interaction was such that, for both mental health outcomes, those living in rural neighborhoods with higher Percent TCC were more likely to have moderate to severe mental health symptoms. However, this effect was attenuated after adding neighborhood level socioeconomic disadvantage, suggesting that part of the effect may be due to socioeconomic characteristics of rural versus other neighborhoods.

Conclusions: After adjusting for SDoH, the direct effect of TCC on mental health after TBI was small and opposite the direction hypothesized (higher TCC associated with poorer mental health), particularly for those living in rural neighborhoods potentially more likely to experience socioeconomic disadvantage. Our findings highlight the importance of evaluating interactions between different aspects of the social (eg, SDoH), natural (eg, greenspace), and built (eg, neighborhood type) environment to provide a comprehensive understanding of factors affecting health after TBI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信