A Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize Follow-Up in the New England Area for Pediatric Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

Abstract

Background

The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) continues to grow. Despite the presence of implanted hardware, patient compliance with in-clinic visits and remote transmissions is poor. We performed a quality improvement (QI) initiative to assess and optimize CIED follow-up in the New England area.

Methods

A regional network of eight pediatric institutions was created. All patients with CIEDs were identified starting in 2016. Noncompliance was defined as: no in-person evaluation within 1 year, or no remote transmission within 6 months. Interventions performed included automated texts/emails, certified letters, and personal phone calls.

Results

A total of 612 patients were identified, with the total number of patients increasing over the 5-year QI period as patients had devices implanted and removed. Initial noncompliance with in-person annual follow-up was 29%. If patients were noncompliant, a personal phone call was made, reminding them to return to clinic. If the patient could not be reached for 3 months, a certified letter was sent. The noncompliance rate decreased to 5% over the first year and remained around this level over the QI period (3%–9%). For remote transmissions, 54% of patients were noncompliant. Interventions were performed on subgroups of patients. Automated texts/emails were trialed in 126; after 6 months, 41% of these patients remained noncompliant. Phone calls were then trialed on 87 patients. Over 6 months, noncompliance decreased to 11%.

Conclusions

Patients with CIEDs have poor compliance with regular follow-up. Patients have a limited response to automated measures (texts/emails). Personal phone calls had the greatest impact in improving compliance.