Association of Primary Care Access with Health-Related ChatGPT Use: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Oluwatobiloba Ayo-Ajibola, Catherine Julien, Matthew E Lin, Jeffrey Riddell, Naihua Duan, Richard L Kravitz
{"title":"Association of Primary Care Access with Health-Related ChatGPT Use: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Oluwatobiloba Ayo-Ajibola, Catherine Julien, Matthew E Lin, Jeffrey Riddell, Naihua Duan, Richard L Kravitz","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09406-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ChatGPT has quickly gained popularity as a source of online health information (OHI). However, it is unclear how having a usual source of primary care (USPC) is related to OHI-seeking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore how having a USPC and other characteristics thought to affect access-to-care influence the use of ChatGPT and other OHI forms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional national survey.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult members of ResearchMatch, a non-profit affiliate of the National Institutes of Health, between June and August 2023.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The survey evaluated demographics, health characteristics, and OHI-seeking behaviors, including ChatGPT usage. OHI sources were categorized as \"passive\" (Google, Wikipedia, WebMD) and \"interactive\" (forums, Q&A sites, ChatGPT). Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests compared users by USPC status. Multiple logistic regression estimated adjusted effects on ChatGPT use.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of 21,499 adults invited to participate in the survey, 2406 (11.2%) responded. Among respondents, 56% reported having a USPC. Those with a USPC, compared to those without, were older, spoke English as their primary language, had higher income, and had more formal education (all p<.001). Participants with a USPC were more likely to use passive OHI (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.55-3.90, p<.001) and less likely to use interactive OHI (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, p=.002) or ChatGPT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, p<.001). Age over 50 (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.20, p<.001), non-White race (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.70, p<.001), very good or better health (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, p=.009), and college education (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, p=.035) were inversely related to ChatGPT use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this national survey of patients participating in a clinical research matching service, those with regular primary care access relied less on ChatGPT, suggesting that a personal primary care relationship may attenuate the need or motivation to use AI-derived OHI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09406-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ChatGPT has quickly gained popularity as a source of online health information (OHI). However, it is unclear how having a usual source of primary care (USPC) is related to OHI-seeking.

Objective: Explore how having a USPC and other characteristics thought to affect access-to-care influence the use of ChatGPT and other OHI forms.

Design: Cross-sectional national survey.

Participants: Adult members of ResearchMatch, a non-profit affiliate of the National Institutes of Health, between June and August 2023.

Main measures: The survey evaluated demographics, health characteristics, and OHI-seeking behaviors, including ChatGPT usage. OHI sources were categorized as "passive" (Google, Wikipedia, WebMD) and "interactive" (forums, Q&A sites, ChatGPT). Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests compared users by USPC status. Multiple logistic regression estimated adjusted effects on ChatGPT use.

Key results: Of 21,499 adults invited to participate in the survey, 2406 (11.2%) responded. Among respondents, 56% reported having a USPC. Those with a USPC, compared to those without, were older, spoke English as their primary language, had higher income, and had more formal education (all p<.001). Participants with a USPC were more likely to use passive OHI (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.55-3.90, p<.001) and less likely to use interactive OHI (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, p=.002) or ChatGPT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, p<.001). Age over 50 (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06-0.20, p<.001), non-White race (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.70, p<.001), very good or better health (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92, p=.009), and college education (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.97, p=.035) were inversely related to ChatGPT use.

Conclusions: In this national survey of patients participating in a clinical research matching service, those with regular primary care access relied less on ChatGPT, suggesting that a personal primary care relationship may attenuate the need or motivation to use AI-derived OHI.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信