Engage less, provide more: Community health workers' perspectives on how to overcome opposition to polio vaccination in Pakistan.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645
Arman Majidulla, Marium A Sultan, Ayesha Zaman, Muhammad Shafique, Saeed Ahmed, Farah Naz, Sadaf Nayyab, Ali Sohail
{"title":"Engage less, provide more: Community health workers' perspectives on how to overcome opposition to polio vaccination in Pakistan.","authors":"Arman Majidulla, Marium A Sultan, Ayesha Zaman, Muhammad Shafique, Saeed Ahmed, Farah Naz, Sadaf Nayyab, Ali Sohail","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pakistan has 40 Super High Risk Union Councils (SHRUCs) where polio has been persistently endemic, and community relationships have been a persistent challenge due to campaign fatigue and violent, organised resistance. This study aimed to gather perspectives from frontline workers in these areas to improve community engagement. We conducted participant observation, over 100 interviews, and held Human-centred Design inspired sessions with 171 teams of frontline polio staff from 2020 to 2022 in the SHRUCs of a major city in Pakistan. The results show that frontline polio workers repeatedly visited households broadly neglected by government services in SHRUCs, but some households refused the vaccine due to fatigue from multiple visits and fear of government surveillance. Others refused the vaccine to draw attention to their more pressing needs. Frontline polio workers suggested that decreasing touchpoints and providing additional services, such as food, medicines, primary health care, and sanitation services, would improve vaccine uptake. We discuss several implications for vaccine communications, including the importance of quality engagement, the legitimacy of rumours surrounding vaccination, the limited applicability of 'vaccine hesitancy', and the critical role of service provision in improving vaccine acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2465645"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2465645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pakistan has 40 Super High Risk Union Councils (SHRUCs) where polio has been persistently endemic, and community relationships have been a persistent challenge due to campaign fatigue and violent, organised resistance. This study aimed to gather perspectives from frontline workers in these areas to improve community engagement. We conducted participant observation, over 100 interviews, and held Human-centred Design inspired sessions with 171 teams of frontline polio staff from 2020 to 2022 in the SHRUCs of a major city in Pakistan. The results show that frontline polio workers repeatedly visited households broadly neglected by government services in SHRUCs, but some households refused the vaccine due to fatigue from multiple visits and fear of government surveillance. Others refused the vaccine to draw attention to their more pressing needs. Frontline polio workers suggested that decreasing touchpoints and providing additional services, such as food, medicines, primary health care, and sanitation services, would improve vaccine uptake. We discuss several implications for vaccine communications, including the importance of quality engagement, the legitimacy of rumours surrounding vaccination, the limited applicability of 'vaccine hesitancy', and the critical role of service provision in improving vaccine acceptability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信