Determination of calibration reference values < 1cGy MU-1 as detailed in the IPEM 2020 high-energy photon code of practice.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Niamh Clarke, Glenn Whitten, Raymond B King, Alan Robert Hounsell, Denise M Irvine, Christina E Agnew
{"title":"Determination of calibration reference values < 1cGy MU-1 as detailed in the IPEM 2020 high-energy photon code of practice.","authors":"Niamh Clarke, Glenn Whitten, Raymond B King, Alan Robert Hounsell, Denise M Irvine, Christina E Agnew","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adb435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background.</i>In 2020, the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) published an updated code of practice (COP) for high-energy photon therapy dosimetry (1), with a further update published in 2023 (2). The 2020 COP provided an option to calibrate isocentrically at 10 cm deep to a reference value for each energy that is less than 1 cGy/MU, to give approximately 1 cGy/MU at the depth of dose maximum (dmax). These reference values can relate the machine calibration at dmax in a fixed source-to-surface distance (SSD) setup, to the machine calibration in an isocentric setup at 10 cm deep. This option was provided to give consistency in the number of monitor units (MU) with dose in cGy in the updated reference conditions, to those typical of fixed SSD conditions, with minimal adjustment to linac output.<i>Purpose.</i>The aim of this study was to determine such reference values for beam energies 6MV, 15MV, 6FFF and 10FFF and their respective tissue phantom ratios (TPR20,10) 0.630 - 0.763. Methods. Reference values for clinical energies 6MV, 15MV, 6FFF and 10FFF were determined over multiple Varian TrueBeam linacs, field ionisation chambers and electrometers and from historical quality control (QC) records over 11 years.<i>Results.</i>Reference values were determined as 0.799, 0.929, 0.761 and 0.855 for 6MV, 15MV, 6FFF and 10FFF respectively. The variation in these data (1 standard deviation, [SD]) was <0.004, demonstrating the stability of these reference values in a single centre study. Modelling of reference values using treatment planning system (TPS) data also demonstrated small differences compared to measured data of 0.06 ± 0.29 %. The relative standard uncertainty in these reference values was determined as 0.38 %. Adding this uncertainty in quadrature to the published uncertainties for isocentric calibration published in the 2020 COP contributes an additional 0.06 %.<i>Conclusions.</i>Published reference values for clinical range of TPRs may aid centres implementing this option of the 2020 COP to confirm their data, with the shift away from a reference value of unity. Understanding the magnitude of the uncertainty in these reference values shows the impact of dose calibration at a reference position e.g. dmax, different to a dose planned and delivered isocentrically and can help ascertain the risk/benefit of changing machine calibration and measurement conditions. Similarly, given the magnitude of the uncertainty in these reference values, incorporating such a factor to convert from one calibration setup condition to another could be used to assist in peer-to-peer audit against the 2020 COP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adb435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background.In 2020, the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) published an updated code of practice (COP) for high-energy photon therapy dosimetry (1), with a further update published in 2023 (2). The 2020 COP provided an option to calibrate isocentrically at 10 cm deep to a reference value for each energy that is less than 1 cGy/MU, to give approximately 1 cGy/MU at the depth of dose maximum (dmax). These reference values can relate the machine calibration at dmax in a fixed source-to-surface distance (SSD) setup, to the machine calibration in an isocentric setup at 10 cm deep. This option was provided to give consistency in the number of monitor units (MU) with dose in cGy in the updated reference conditions, to those typical of fixed SSD conditions, with minimal adjustment to linac output.Purpose.The aim of this study was to determine such reference values for beam energies 6MV, 15MV, 6FFF and 10FFF and their respective tissue phantom ratios (TPR20,10) 0.630 - 0.763. Methods. Reference values for clinical energies 6MV, 15MV, 6FFF and 10FFF were determined over multiple Varian TrueBeam linacs, field ionisation chambers and electrometers and from historical quality control (QC) records over 11 years.Results.Reference values were determined as 0.799, 0.929, 0.761 and 0.855 for 6MV, 15MV, 6FFF and 10FFF respectively. The variation in these data (1 standard deviation, [SD]) was <0.004, demonstrating the stability of these reference values in a single centre study. Modelling of reference values using treatment planning system (TPS) data also demonstrated small differences compared to measured data of 0.06 ± 0.29 %. The relative standard uncertainty in these reference values was determined as 0.38 %. Adding this uncertainty in quadrature to the published uncertainties for isocentric calibration published in the 2020 COP contributes an additional 0.06 %.Conclusions.Published reference values for clinical range of TPRs may aid centres implementing this option of the 2020 COP to confirm their data, with the shift away from a reference value of unity. Understanding the magnitude of the uncertainty in these reference values shows the impact of dose calibration at a reference position e.g. dmax, different to a dose planned and delivered isocentrically and can help ascertain the risk/benefit of changing machine calibration and measurement conditions. Similarly, given the magnitude of the uncertainty in these reference values, incorporating such a factor to convert from one calibration setup condition to another could be used to assist in peer-to-peer audit against the 2020 COP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信