Surgical patient-reported experience measures and qualitative experience studies: systematic review.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae142
Maram Darwish, Shabita Nandy, Simone Willis, James Coulson, Kathleen Withers, David C Bosanquet
{"title":"Surgical patient-reported experience measures and qualitative experience studies: systematic review.","authors":"Maram Darwish, Shabita Nandy, Simone Willis, James Coulson, Kathleen Withers, David C Bosanquet","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported experience measures are tools used to gather feedback from patients about their experiences of healthcare services, which are crucial for improving the quality of care from the perspective of patients. The aim of this systematic review was to identify surgery-related patient-reported experience measures, evaluate their psychometric properties, appraise and identify recurring themes within qualitative studies on surgical care, and identify potential bias in study designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, and the Cochrane Library, along with clinical trial registries, were searched for articles on surgery-specific patient-reported experience measures and qualitative studies on patients' experiences up to 21 September 2023. Manual coding was used for theme identification and grouping based on thematic synthesis principles. Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for risk-of-bias assessment and a revised version of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist was used for appraisal of patient-reported experience measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, identifying seven patient-reported experience measures. Key patient experience themes included communication with healthcare providers, care setting environment, overall satisfaction, pre-admission information, coordination of care, waiting time, surgical experience, post-surgery support, impact on life, and healthcare information and technology management. Internal consistency was reported adequately across all patient-reported experience measures. Other psychometric properties were questionable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inadequate psychometric evaluations of some patient-reported experience measures in surgery highlight the need for rigorous validity and reliability assessments. Identification of thematic patterns emphasizes the importance of ongoing research to explore patients' experiences in surgical contexts. Clinical staff can use this information to enhance communication, reduce waiting time, and improve the overall patient experience by addressing highlighted areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11811639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported experience measures are tools used to gather feedback from patients about their experiences of healthcare services, which are crucial for improving the quality of care from the perspective of patients. The aim of this systematic review was to identify surgery-related patient-reported experience measures, evaluate their psychometric properties, appraise and identify recurring themes within qualitative studies on surgical care, and identify potential bias in study designs.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, and the Cochrane Library, along with clinical trial registries, were searched for articles on surgery-specific patient-reported experience measures and qualitative studies on patients' experiences up to 21 September 2023. Manual coding was used for theme identification and grouping based on thematic synthesis principles. Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for risk-of-bias assessment and a revised version of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist was used for appraisal of patient-reported experience measures.

Results: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, identifying seven patient-reported experience measures. Key patient experience themes included communication with healthcare providers, care setting environment, overall satisfaction, pre-admission information, coordination of care, waiting time, surgical experience, post-surgery support, impact on life, and healthcare information and technology management. Internal consistency was reported adequately across all patient-reported experience measures. Other psychometric properties were questionable.

Conclusion: Inadequate psychometric evaluations of some patient-reported experience measures in surgery highlight the need for rigorous validity and reliability assessments. Identification of thematic patterns emphasizes the importance of ongoing research to explore patients' experiences in surgical contexts. Clinical staff can use this information to enhance communication, reduce waiting time, and improve the overall patient experience by addressing highlighted areas.

外科病人报告的经验测量和定性经验研究:系统回顾。
背景:患者报告的体验措施是用于收集患者关于其医疗保健服务体验的反馈的工具,这对于从患者的角度提高护理质量至关重要。本系统综述的目的是确定与手术相关的患者报告的经验措施,评估其心理测量特性,评估和确定外科护理定性研究中反复出现的主题,并确定研究设计中的潜在偏差。方法:检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、护理和联合健康文献数据库累积索引和Cochrane图书馆,以及临床试验注册库,检索截至2023年9月21日的关于特定手术患者报告经验测量和患者经验定性研究的文章。基于主题综合原则,采用人工编码进行主题识别和分组。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具进行偏倚风险评估,并使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准清单的修订版来评估患者报告的经验措施。结果:共有14项研究符合纳入标准,确定了7项患者报告的体验措施。关键的患者体验主题包括与医疗保健提供者的沟通、护理环境、总体满意度、入院前信息、护理协调、等待时间、手术经验、术后支持、对生活的影响以及医疗保健信息和技术管理。在所有患者报告的体验措施中充分报告了内部一致性。其他的心理测量特性也值得怀疑。结论:一些患者报告的手术经验测量的心理测量评估不足,突出了严格的效度和信度评估的必要性。确定主题模式强调了正在进行的研究的重要性,以探索手术背景下患者的经验。临床工作人员可以利用这些信息加强沟通,减少等待时间,并通过解决重点领域来改善患者的整体体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信