Takaki Tanamoto, Misa Hayasaka, Lindsay Robbins, George Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita
{"title":"Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on the Incidence of No Prenatal Care.","authors":"Takaki Tanamoto, Misa Hayasaka, Lindsay Robbins, George Saade, Tetsuya Kawakita","doi":"10.1055/a-2535-8309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to examine the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the racial disparity in prenatal care utilization in the United States before and during the pandemic.This was a cross-sectional study using the National Vital Statistics Data from 2018 to 2022. Our focus was on low-risk individuals who delivered singleton pregnancies at term. The analysis was restricted to Black and White individuals to explore racial disparities. The study periods based on the last menstrual period (LMP) were prepandemic (March 2018-February 2020) and pandemic (March 2020-February 2022). The primary outcome was the rate of no prenatal care. We employed interrupted time series analysis, negative binomial regression models, adjusting for confounders, seasonality, and autocorrelation. We conducted postestimation analyses to calculate the counterfactual and actual incidences of outcomes for individuals with an LMP in March 2020 and February 2022. Difference-in-difference (DID) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was estimated.The analysis included 3,511,813 individuals in the prepandemic period and 5,163,486 in the pandemic period. For individuals with LMP in March 2020, the actual incidences of no prenatal care per 100 births were 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0, 3.3) for Black individuals and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2, 2.0) for White individuals. The difference between counterfactual and actual no prenatal care rates per 100 births for Black individuals was 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.5), indicating a significant increase in no prenatal care. Conversely, there was no significant difference for White individuals. DID analysis further demonstrated that this increase was greater in Black individuals compared with White individuals (DID per 100 births 0.3 [95% CI: 0.1, 0.5]). For individuals with LMP in February 2022, this difference in disparity further worsened (DID per 100 births 0.8 [95% CI: 0.4, 1.2]).The COVID-19 pandemic increased the incidence of no prenatal care, which disproportionately affected Black individuals. · The COVID-19 pandemic increased racial disparities.. · The increase in no prenatal care among Black individuals.. · White individuals are lower affected during this period..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1778-1785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2535-8309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the racial disparity in prenatal care utilization in the United States before and during the pandemic.This was a cross-sectional study using the National Vital Statistics Data from 2018 to 2022. Our focus was on low-risk individuals who delivered singleton pregnancies at term. The analysis was restricted to Black and White individuals to explore racial disparities. The study periods based on the last menstrual period (LMP) were prepandemic (March 2018-February 2020) and pandemic (March 2020-February 2022). The primary outcome was the rate of no prenatal care. We employed interrupted time series analysis, negative binomial regression models, adjusting for confounders, seasonality, and autocorrelation. We conducted postestimation analyses to calculate the counterfactual and actual incidences of outcomes for individuals with an LMP in March 2020 and February 2022. Difference-in-difference (DID) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was estimated.The analysis included 3,511,813 individuals in the prepandemic period and 5,163,486 in the pandemic period. For individuals with LMP in March 2020, the actual incidences of no prenatal care per 100 births were 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0, 3.3) for Black individuals and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2, 2.0) for White individuals. The difference between counterfactual and actual no prenatal care rates per 100 births for Black individuals was 0.4 (95% CI: 0.2, 0.5), indicating a significant increase in no prenatal care. Conversely, there was no significant difference for White individuals. DID analysis further demonstrated that this increase was greater in Black individuals compared with White individuals (DID per 100 births 0.3 [95% CI: 0.1, 0.5]). For individuals with LMP in February 2022, this difference in disparity further worsened (DID per 100 births 0.8 [95% CI: 0.4, 1.2]).The COVID-19 pandemic increased the incidence of no prenatal care, which disproportionately affected Black individuals. · The COVID-19 pandemic increased racial disparities.. · The increase in no prenatal care among Black individuals.. · White individuals are lower affected during this period..
目的:探讨新冠肺炎疫情对美国产前保健利用的种族差异的影响。研究设计:这是一项使用2018年至2022年国家生命统计数据的横断面研究。我们的重点是在足月分娩单胎妊娠的低风险个体。为了探究种族差异,该分析仅限于黑人和白人。基于最后一次月经(LMP)的研究期为大流行前(2018年3月至2020年2月)和大流行期(2020年3月至2022年2月)。主要结局是没有产前护理的比率。我们采用中断时间序列分析(ITSA),负二项回归模型,调整混杂因素,季节性和自相关性。我们进行了后估计分析,以计算2020年3月和2022年2月LMP患者结果的反事实和实际发生率。用95%置信区间(95% CI)估计差中差(DID)。结果:该分析包括大流行前期的3,511,813例和大流行期间的5,163,486例。对于2020年3月患有LMP的个体,黑人个体每100个新生儿中没有产前护理的实际发生率为3.2 (95% CI 3.0, 3.3),白人个体为1.6 (95% CI 1.2, 2.0)。黑人个体每100个新生儿的反事实和实际无产前护理率之间的差异为0.4 (95% CI 0.2, 0.5),表明无产前护理率显著增加。相反,在白人个体中没有显著差异。DID分析进一步表明,与白人相比,黑人个体的这种增加更大(每100个新生儿的DID为0.3 [95% CI 0.1, 0.5])。对于2022年2月患有LMP的个体,这种差异进一步恶化(每100个新生儿的DID为0.8 [95% CI 0.4, 1.2])。结论:新冠肺炎大流行增加了未进行产前护理的发生率,这对黑人人群的影响尤为严重。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.