Evaluation of the toxicity of combustion smokes at the air–liquid interface: a comparison between two lung cell models and two exposure methods

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
A. Ashrin, E. Anna, E. Peyret, G. Barbier, Maxime Floreani, C. Pointart, D. Medus, G. Fayet, P. Rotureau, T. Loret, G. Lacroix
{"title":"Evaluation of the toxicity of combustion smokes at the air–liquid interface: a comparison between two lung cell models and two exposure methods","authors":"A. Ashrin,&nbsp;E. Anna,&nbsp;E. Peyret,&nbsp;G. Barbier,&nbsp;Maxime Floreani,&nbsp;C. Pointart,&nbsp;D. Medus,&nbsp;G. Fayet,&nbsp;P. Rotureau,&nbsp;T. Loret,&nbsp;G. Lacroix","doi":"10.1007/s00204-025-03964-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In vitro tests at the air–liquid interface (ALI) represent valuable alternatives to animal experiments to assess the acute toxicity of inhalable compounds. However, these methods still need to be characterized for the toxicity evaluation of complex mixtures such as combustion smokes. In this study, Alveolar type I or Alveolar type 2 cells in co-culture with macrophages were investigated as models for evaluating the acute toxicity of complex mixtures at the air–liquid interface. In that purpose, smokes/obscurants were generated from pyrotechnic devices of known toxic potentials in a 1.3 m<sup>3</sup> chamber and the co-cultures were exposed to smokes in static (directly in the chamber) or in dynamic using Vitrocell® modules. After exposure to smokes, static exposure induced higher cell mortality compared to dynamic, likely due to an increased dose. Nevertheless, we could still discriminate between a high-toxic (TA) and a low-toxic (RP) smoke using both exposure methods. Due to important cell mortality in static, oxidative and inflammatory potentials were only evaluated in dynamic mode. Reactive oxygen species were generated in response to smokes in hAELVI-THP-1 but not in A549-THP-1. After exposure to TA, increased levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were released by A549-THP-1 compared to the control while hAELVI-THP-1 released significant amount of IL-8. No inflammation was reported following exposure to RP, likely due to important cell mortality. Although discrepancies exist between the two cell models and exposure modes, these results suggest that both co-cultures and exposure methods remain promising for evaluating the toxicity of inhalable mixtures such as smokes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":"99 4","pages":"1471 - 1484"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-025-03964-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In vitro tests at the air–liquid interface (ALI) represent valuable alternatives to animal experiments to assess the acute toxicity of inhalable compounds. However, these methods still need to be characterized for the toxicity evaluation of complex mixtures such as combustion smokes. In this study, Alveolar type I or Alveolar type 2 cells in co-culture with macrophages were investigated as models for evaluating the acute toxicity of complex mixtures at the air–liquid interface. In that purpose, smokes/obscurants were generated from pyrotechnic devices of known toxic potentials in a 1.3 m3 chamber and the co-cultures were exposed to smokes in static (directly in the chamber) or in dynamic using Vitrocell® modules. After exposure to smokes, static exposure induced higher cell mortality compared to dynamic, likely due to an increased dose. Nevertheless, we could still discriminate between a high-toxic (TA) and a low-toxic (RP) smoke using both exposure methods. Due to important cell mortality in static, oxidative and inflammatory potentials were only evaluated in dynamic mode. Reactive oxygen species were generated in response to smokes in hAELVI-THP-1 but not in A549-THP-1. After exposure to TA, increased levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were released by A549-THP-1 compared to the control while hAELVI-THP-1 released significant amount of IL-8. No inflammation was reported following exposure to RP, likely due to important cell mortality. Although discrepancies exist between the two cell models and exposure modes, these results suggest that both co-cultures and exposure methods remain promising for evaluating the toxicity of inhalable mixtures such as smokes.

气液界面燃烧烟雾的毒性评价:两种肺细胞模型和两种暴露方法的比较。
在气液界面(ALI)的体外试验是评估可吸入化合物急性毒性的有价值的替代动物实验。然而,这些方法仍然需要对复杂混合物(如燃烧烟雾)的毒性评价进行表征。在本研究中,研究了肺泡I型或肺泡2型细胞与巨噬细胞共培养,作为评估气液界面复杂混合物急性毒性的模型。为此,在1.3 m3的腔室中,已知有毒电位的烟火装置产生烟雾/遮蔽物,并使用Vitrocell®模块将共培养物暴露于静态(直接在腔室中)或动态烟雾中。暴露于烟雾后,静态暴露比动态暴露诱导更高的细胞死亡率,可能是由于剂量增加。尽管如此,我们仍然可以使用两种暴露方法来区分高毒性(TA)和低毒性(RP)烟雾。由于细胞在静态状态下的重要死亡,氧化和炎症电位仅在动态模式下进行评估。hAELVI-THP-1响应烟雾产生活性氧,而A549-THP-1不产生活性氧。暴露于TA后,与对照组相比,A549-THP-1释放IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α水平升高,而hAELVI-THP-1释放大量IL-8。暴露于RP后无炎症报告,可能是由于重要细胞死亡。尽管两种细胞模型和暴露方式之间存在差异,但这些结果表明,共同培养和暴露方法仍然有希望评估可吸入混合物(如烟雾)的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信