A formal testing method for multi-agent systems using colored Petri nets

IF 2 3区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Ricardo Arend Machado, Arthur da Silva Zelindro Cardoso, Giovani Parente Farias, Eder Mateus Nunes Gonçalves, Diana Francisca Adamatti
{"title":"A formal testing method for multi-agent systems using colored Petri nets","authors":"Ricardo Arend Machado,&nbsp;Arthur da Silva Zelindro Cardoso,&nbsp;Giovani Parente Farias,&nbsp;Eder Mateus Nunes Gonçalves,&nbsp;Diana Francisca Adamatti","doi":"10.1007/s10458-025-09690-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autonomy in software, a system’s ability to make decisions and take actions independently without human intervention, is a fundamental characteristic of multi-agent systems. Testing, a crucial phase of software validation, is particularly challenging in multi-agent systems due to its complexity, as the interaction between autonomous agents can result in emergent behaviors and collective intelligence, leading to system properties not found in individual agents. A multi-agent system operates on at least three main dimensions: the individual level, the social level, and the communication interfaces. An organizational model formally defines a multi-agent system’s structure, roles, relationships, and interactions. It represents the social layer, capturing agents’ collective dynamics and dependencies, facilitating coherent and efficient collaboration to achieve individual and collective goals. During the literature review, a gap was identified when testing the social layer of multi-agent systems. This paper presents a testing approach by formally introducing steps to map an organizational model, here <span>\\(\\mathcal {M}\\)</span>oise<span>\\(^+\\)</span>, into a colored Petri net. This mapping aims to generate a formal system model, which is used to generate and count test cases based on a coverage criterion. Finally, a use case called Inspector was presented to demonstrate the method by generating test cases, executing the test, and identifying execution errors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55586,"journal":{"name":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10458-025-09690-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomy in software, a system’s ability to make decisions and take actions independently without human intervention, is a fundamental characteristic of multi-agent systems. Testing, a crucial phase of software validation, is particularly challenging in multi-agent systems due to its complexity, as the interaction between autonomous agents can result in emergent behaviors and collective intelligence, leading to system properties not found in individual agents. A multi-agent system operates on at least three main dimensions: the individual level, the social level, and the communication interfaces. An organizational model formally defines a multi-agent system’s structure, roles, relationships, and interactions. It represents the social layer, capturing agents’ collective dynamics and dependencies, facilitating coherent and efficient collaboration to achieve individual and collective goals. During the literature review, a gap was identified when testing the social layer of multi-agent systems. This paper presents a testing approach by formally introducing steps to map an organizational model, here \(\mathcal {M}\)oise\(^+\), into a colored Petri net. This mapping aims to generate a formal system model, which is used to generate and count test cases based on a coverage criterion. Finally, a use case called Inspector was presented to demonstrate the method by generating test cases, executing the test, and identifying execution errors.

Abstract Image

彩色Petri网用于多智能体系统的形式化测试方法
软件的自主性,即系统在没有人为干预的情况下独立做出决策和采取行动的能力,是多智能体系统的一个基本特征。测试是软件验证的关键阶段,由于其复杂性,在多智能体系统中尤其具有挑战性,因为自主智能体之间的交互可能导致紧急行为和集体智能,从而导致在单个智能体中没有发现的系统属性。多智能体系统至少在三个主要维度上运行:个人层面、社会层面和通信接口。组织模型正式定义了多代理系统的结构、角色、关系和交互。它代表社会层,捕捉代理的集体动态和依赖关系,促进一致和有效的协作,以实现个人和集体的目标。在文献综述中,发现在测试多智能体系统的社会层时存在空白。本文通过正式介绍将组织模型映射到彩色Petri网的步骤(这里是\(\mathcal {M}\) oise \(^+\)),提出了一种测试方法。该映射旨在生成一个正式的系统模型,该模型用于基于覆盖标准生成和计数测试用例。最后,提出了一个名为Inspector的用例,通过生成测试用例、执行测试和识别执行错误来演示该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This is the official journal of the International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. It provides a leading forum for disseminating significant original research results in the foundations, theory, development, analysis, and applications of autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Coverage in Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems includes, but is not limited to: Agent decision-making architectures and their evaluation, including: cognitive models; knowledge representation; logics for agency; ontological reasoning; planning (single and multi-agent); reasoning (single and multi-agent) Cooperation and teamwork, including: distributed problem solving; human-robot/agent interaction; multi-user/multi-virtual-agent interaction; coalition formation; coordination Agent communication languages, including: their semantics, pragmatics, and implementation; agent communication protocols and conversations; agent commitments; speech act theory Ontologies for agent systems, agents and the semantic web, agents and semantic web services, Grid-based systems, and service-oriented computing Agent societies and societal issues, including: artificial social systems; environments, organizations and institutions; ethical and legal issues; privacy, safety and security; trust, reliability and reputation Agent-based system development, including: agent development techniques, tools and environments; agent programming languages; agent specification or validation languages Agent-based simulation, including: emergent behavior; participatory simulation; simulation techniques, tools and environments; social simulation Agreement technologies, including: argumentation; collective decision making; judgment aggregation and belief merging; negotiation; norms Economic paradigms, including: auction and mechanism design; bargaining and negotiation; economically-motivated agents; game theory (cooperative and non-cooperative); social choice and voting Learning agents, including: computational architectures for learning agents; evolution, adaptation; multi-agent learning. Robotic agents, including: integrated perception, cognition, and action; cognitive robotics; robot planning (including action and motion planning); multi-robot systems. Virtual agents, including: agents in games and virtual environments; companion and coaching agents; modeling personality, emotions; multimodal interaction; verbal and non-verbal expressiveness Significant, novel applications of agent technology Comprehensive reviews and authoritative tutorials of research and practice in agent systems Comprehensive and authoritative reviews of books dealing with agents and multi-agent systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信