Alice Miller , Emma Osborne , Richard Edwards , Alex Macmillan , Caroline Shaw
{"title":"The road lobby and unhealthy transport policy discourse in Aotearoa New Zealand: A framing analysis","authors":"Alice Miller , Emma Osborne , Richard Edwards , Alex Macmillan , Caroline Shaw","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.101999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transport is an important determinant of population health. Decarbonisation of the transport system is also a critical part of climate policy with additional health co-benefits to be gained by reducing car dependence. Despite this knowledge, there has been inadequate progress in transport policy to protect the health of people and the planet.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To discover whether commercial entities in the road transport sector of Aotearoa New Zealand are using techniques common to other harmful commodity industries to influence transport policy to further their interests at the expense of health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used qualitative document analysis to describe a sample of road transport interest groups and analyse the framing and arguments these organisations used in submissions to national transport and climate change policy consultations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The examined “road lobby” included commercial organisations representing the automotive, road freight and energy industries. These organisations were well-resourced and undertook political activities intended to influence government policy. They supported policies that promoted private vehicles and investment in their supporting infrastructure whilst opposing the reallocation of transport funding from roads to low-carbon transport modes and tighter regulation of vehicle emissions. Submissions used similar framings to those commonly used by other unhealthy industries but with different arguments relating to road safety and transport funding. We identified some “circular policy-blocking arguments” that countered policies designed for mode shift and climate mitigation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Public health should use commercial determinants of health frameworks to guide action on transport. Transport policymakers should ensure that vested interests do not distort policy choices and that decision-making frameworks accurately reflect the short and long-term harms of different transport modes. Further research is needed to determine to what extent the “road lobby” influences policy outcomes, and if other techniques of influence are being employed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 101999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140525000192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transport is an important determinant of population health. Decarbonisation of the transport system is also a critical part of climate policy with additional health co-benefits to be gained by reducing car dependence. Despite this knowledge, there has been inadequate progress in transport policy to protect the health of people and the planet.
Aim
To discover whether commercial entities in the road transport sector of Aotearoa New Zealand are using techniques common to other harmful commodity industries to influence transport policy to further their interests at the expense of health.
Methods
We used qualitative document analysis to describe a sample of road transport interest groups and analyse the framing and arguments these organisations used in submissions to national transport and climate change policy consultations.
Results
The examined “road lobby” included commercial organisations representing the automotive, road freight and energy industries. These organisations were well-resourced and undertook political activities intended to influence government policy. They supported policies that promoted private vehicles and investment in their supporting infrastructure whilst opposing the reallocation of transport funding from roads to low-carbon transport modes and tighter regulation of vehicle emissions. Submissions used similar framings to those commonly used by other unhealthy industries but with different arguments relating to road safety and transport funding. We identified some “circular policy-blocking arguments” that countered policies designed for mode shift and climate mitigation.
Conclusion
Public health should use commercial determinants of health frameworks to guide action on transport. Transport policymakers should ensure that vested interests do not distort policy choices and that decision-making frameworks accurately reflect the short and long-term harms of different transport modes. Further research is needed to determine to what extent the “road lobby” influences policy outcomes, and if other techniques of influence are being employed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
