Improving aboveground biomass density mapping of arid and semi-arid vegetation by combining GEDI LiDAR, Sentinel-1/2 imagery and field data

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Luis A. Hernández-Martínez , Juan Manuel Dupuy-Rada , Alfonso Medel-Narváez , Carlos Portillo-Quintero , José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni
{"title":"Improving aboveground biomass density mapping of arid and semi-arid vegetation by combining GEDI LiDAR, Sentinel-1/2 imagery and field data","authors":"Luis A. Hernández-Martínez ,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Dupuy-Rada ,&nbsp;Alfonso Medel-Narváez ,&nbsp;Carlos Portillo-Quintero ,&nbsp;José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2025.100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimates of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) are essential to guide mitigation strategies for climate change. NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) project delivers full-waveform LiDAR data and provides a unique opportunity to improve AGBD estimates. However, global GEDI estimates (GEDI-L4A) have some constraints, such as lack of full coverage of AGBD maps and scarcity of training data for some biomes, particularly in arid areas. Moreover, uncertainties remain about the type of GEDI footprint that best penetrates the canopy and yields accurate vegetation structure metrics. This study estimates forest biomass of arid and semi-arid zones in two stages. First, a model was fitted to predict AGBD by relating GEDI and field data from different vegetation types, including xeric shrubland. Second, different footprint qualities were evaluated, and their AGBD was related to images from Sentinel-1 and -2 satellites to produce a wall-to-wall map of AGBD. The model fitted with field data and GEDI showed adequate performance (%RMSE = 45.0) and produced more accurate estimates than GEDI-L4A (%RMSE = 84.6). The wall-to-wall mapping model also performed well (%RMSE = 37.0) and substantially reduced the underestimation of AGBD for arid zones. This study highlights the advantages of fitting new models for AGBD estimation from GEDI and local field data, whose combination with satellite imagery yielded accurate wall-to-wall AGBD estimates with a 10 m resolution. The results of this study contribute new perspectives to improve the accuracy of AGBD estimates in arid zones, whose role in climate change mitigation may be markedly underestimated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100204"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017225000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimates of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) are essential to guide mitigation strategies for climate change. NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) project delivers full-waveform LiDAR data and provides a unique opportunity to improve AGBD estimates. However, global GEDI estimates (GEDI-L4A) have some constraints, such as lack of full coverage of AGBD maps and scarcity of training data for some biomes, particularly in arid areas. Moreover, uncertainties remain about the type of GEDI footprint that best penetrates the canopy and yields accurate vegetation structure metrics. This study estimates forest biomass of arid and semi-arid zones in two stages. First, a model was fitted to predict AGBD by relating GEDI and field data from different vegetation types, including xeric shrubland. Second, different footprint qualities were evaluated, and their AGBD was related to images from Sentinel-1 and -2 satellites to produce a wall-to-wall map of AGBD. The model fitted with field data and GEDI showed adequate performance (%RMSE = 45.0) and produced more accurate estimates than GEDI-L4A (%RMSE = 84.6). The wall-to-wall mapping model also performed well (%RMSE = 37.0) and substantially reduced the underestimation of AGBD for arid zones. This study highlights the advantages of fitting new models for AGBD estimation from GEDI and local field data, whose combination with satellite imagery yielded accurate wall-to-wall AGBD estimates with a 10 m resolution. The results of this study contribute new perspectives to improve the accuracy of AGBD estimates in arid zones, whose role in climate change mitigation may be markedly underestimated.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信