Mingyu Hou , Chenzhu Wang , Said M. Easa , Jianchuan Cheng , Jiaxuan Cheng
{"title":"Cognitive decision process of pedestrians in street crossing: Insights from prototype willingness model","authors":"Mingyu Hou , Chenzhu Wang , Said M. Easa , Jianchuan Cheng , Jiaxuan Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The cognitive decision-making process of pedestrians using mobile phones while crossing streets was examined in this study through the application of the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM). The primary objective was to provide a theoretical foundation for formulating targeted interventions to improve traffic safety. A comprehensive questionnaire survey was designed to include extended variables such as nomophobia (the fear of being without a mobile phone) and optimism bias. A total of 464 valid responses were collected and subsequently subjected to validity and reliability analyses through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Following these analyses, a structural equation model was employed to validate the theoretical framework. The findings indicate that the extended PWM effectively explained the cognitive decision-making process of Chinese pedestrians using mobile phones while crossing streets. The study revealed that Behavioral Willingness was the strongest predictor of actual behavior, followed by Behavioral Intention and Optimism Bias. Additionally, factors such as Attitude, Subjective Norms, Prototype Perception, and Nomophobia only indirectly influenced actual behavior. Interestingly, the relationship between Optimism Bias and actual behavior opposed the hypothesized direction. The feasibility, effectiveness, and public acceptance of existing traffic safety interventions were discussed, drawing on both domestic and international data. Based on these findings, specific recommendations for interventions to mitigate distracted pedestrian behavior were proposed, contributing to improved traffic safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"110 ","pages":"Pages 29-56"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782500049X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The cognitive decision-making process of pedestrians using mobile phones while crossing streets was examined in this study through the application of the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM). The primary objective was to provide a theoretical foundation for formulating targeted interventions to improve traffic safety. A comprehensive questionnaire survey was designed to include extended variables such as nomophobia (the fear of being without a mobile phone) and optimism bias. A total of 464 valid responses were collected and subsequently subjected to validity and reliability analyses through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Following these analyses, a structural equation model was employed to validate the theoretical framework. The findings indicate that the extended PWM effectively explained the cognitive decision-making process of Chinese pedestrians using mobile phones while crossing streets. The study revealed that Behavioral Willingness was the strongest predictor of actual behavior, followed by Behavioral Intention and Optimism Bias. Additionally, factors such as Attitude, Subjective Norms, Prototype Perception, and Nomophobia only indirectly influenced actual behavior. Interestingly, the relationship between Optimism Bias and actual behavior opposed the hypothesized direction. The feasibility, effectiveness, and public acceptance of existing traffic safety interventions were discussed, drawing on both domestic and international data. Based on these findings, specific recommendations for interventions to mitigate distracted pedestrian behavior were proposed, contributing to improved traffic safety.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.