Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Flexible Reaming System

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Alejandro Jaramillo Quiceno M.D. , Paula Andrea Sarmiento Riveros M.D. , Camilo Partezani Helito M.D., Ph.D. , Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva M.D. , Rubén Darío Arias Pérez M.D., B.S. , Ricardo Londoño García M.D.
{"title":"Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Flexible Reaming System","authors":"Alejandro Jaramillo Quiceno M.D. ,&nbsp;Paula Andrea Sarmiento Riveros M.D. ,&nbsp;Camilo Partezani Helito M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Andre Giardino Moreira da Silva M.D. ,&nbsp;Rubén Darío Arias Pérez M.D., B.S. ,&nbsp;Ricardo Londoño García M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.eats.2024.103213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The combination of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction represents a therapeutic modality that exhibits superior clinical efficacy for certain risk groups when compared with isolated ACL reconstruction. This approach is progressively gaining broader applicability owing to its inherent prospective advantages. Despite the absence of a universally acknowledged gold-standard surgical technique, several methods have been delineated for its implementation. Typically, conventional practice involves the creation of distinct individual tunnels in the femur, followed by graft fixation using interference screws. However, the conventional steps in the technique are not without potential drawbacks. These include tunnel convergence, screw migration, screw irritation, and the risk of lateral collateral ligament injury. The manifestation of such unfavorable outcomes can necessitate a subsequent surgical intervention for effective management. Consequently, adopting a single socket-shaped tunnel strategy for concurrent reconstruction of the ACL and ALL, coupled with femoral fixation using an adjustable-loop button facilitated by a flexible reaming system, presents potential advantages. This alternative approach can mitigate the aforementioned risks by minimizing morbidity and preserving bone stock. The technique is feasible and reproducible, offering a pragmatic avenue for optimizing clinical outcomes in combined ACL and ALL reconstruction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47827,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Techniques","volume":"14 2","pages":"Article 103213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212628724003475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The combination of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction represents a therapeutic modality that exhibits superior clinical efficacy for certain risk groups when compared with isolated ACL reconstruction. This approach is progressively gaining broader applicability owing to its inherent prospective advantages. Despite the absence of a universally acknowledged gold-standard surgical technique, several methods have been delineated for its implementation. Typically, conventional practice involves the creation of distinct individual tunnels in the femur, followed by graft fixation using interference screws. However, the conventional steps in the technique are not without potential drawbacks. These include tunnel convergence, screw migration, screw irritation, and the risk of lateral collateral ligament injury. The manifestation of such unfavorable outcomes can necessitate a subsequent surgical intervention for effective management. Consequently, adopting a single socket-shaped tunnel strategy for concurrent reconstruction of the ACL and ALL, coupled with femoral fixation using an adjustable-loop button facilitated by a flexible reaming system, presents potential advantages. This alternative approach can mitigate the aforementioned risks by minimizing morbidity and preserving bone stock. The technique is feasible and reproducible, offering a pragmatic avenue for optimizing clinical outcomes in combined ACL and ALL reconstruction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroscopy Techniques
Arthroscopy Techniques ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
33.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信