Léo Bove , Jérémy Meyer , Michael Collins , Eric Frampas , Arnaud Bourreille , Catherine Le Berre
{"title":"Understanding the learning curve of intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease: A comparative study between novice, regular and expert","authors":"Léo Bove , Jérémy Meyer , Michael Collins , Eric Frampas , Arnaud Bourreille , Catherine Le Berre","doi":"10.1016/j.clinre.2025.102548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its reliability depends on the technical skills of the operator.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the IUS learning curve of a novice briefly trained to get him familiarized with the ultrasound machine and normal/abnormal IUS images, and a gastroenterologist with formal general ultrasound training and regular IUS experience (> 200 exams), using an expert radiologist as the gold standard.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The ULTRA-IBD study was a single-center, prospective study involving 50 consecutive IBD patients. Three successive IUS examinations were performed on each patient by the 3 operators. Inter-rater agreement on IUS disease activity was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The experienced gastroenterologist demonstrated consistently good agreement with the radiologist throughout the study, while the novice failed to go beyond poor agreement after 50 examinations, although a faster learning curve was observed in patients without history of IBD surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the difficulty of the technical performance of IUS rather than its interpretation. Comprehensive ultrasound training beforehand and between 50 and 200 examinations of experience are necessary before embarking on IUS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10424,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","volume":"49 3","pages":"Article 102548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210740125000282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its reliability depends on the technical skills of the operator.
Aims
This study aimed to assess the IUS learning curve of a novice briefly trained to get him familiarized with the ultrasound machine and normal/abnormal IUS images, and a gastroenterologist with formal general ultrasound training and regular IUS experience (> 200 exams), using an expert radiologist as the gold standard.
Methods
The ULTRA-IBD study was a single-center, prospective study involving 50 consecutive IBD patients. Three successive IUS examinations were performed on each patient by the 3 operators. Inter-rater agreement on IUS disease activity was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient.
Results
The experienced gastroenterologist demonstrated consistently good agreement with the radiologist throughout the study, while the novice failed to go beyond poor agreement after 50 examinations, although a faster learning curve was observed in patients without history of IBD surgery.
Conclusion
These findings highlight the difficulty of the technical performance of IUS rather than its interpretation. Comprehensive ultrasound training beforehand and between 50 and 200 examinations of experience are necessary before embarking on IUS.
期刊介绍:
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology publishes high-quality original research papers in the field of hepatology and gastroenterology. The editors put the accent on rapid communication of new research and clinical developments and so called "hot topic" issues. Following a clear Editorial line, besides original articles and case reports, each issue features editorials, commentaries and reviews. The journal encourages research and discussion between all those involved in the specialty on an international level. All articles are peer reviewed by international experts, the articles in press are online and indexed in the international databases (Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct).
Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology is a subscription journal (with optional open access), which allows you to publish your research without any cost to you (unless you proactively chose the open access option). Your article will be available to all researchers around the globe whose institution has a subscription to the journal.