YouTube Videos Provide Low-Quality Educational Content About the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee

Q3 Medicine
Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D , Alessandro Carrozzo M.D , Alessandro Annibaldi M.D , Thais Dutra Vieira M.D , Jae-Sung An M.D , Benjamin Freychet M.D , Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet M.D., Ph.D
{"title":"YouTube Videos Provide Low-Quality Educational Content About the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee","authors":"Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D ,&nbsp;Alessandro Carrozzo M.D ,&nbsp;Alessandro Annibaldi M.D ,&nbsp;Thais Dutra Vieira M.D ,&nbsp;Jae-Sung An M.D ,&nbsp;Benjamin Freychet M.D ,&nbsp;Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet M.D., Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the reliability and quality of the educational content of YouTube videos about the anterolateral ligament (ALL).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A standard search of the YouTube database was performed. All English-language videos were included for analysis. Video reliability was assessed with the use of the DISCERN tool, <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). Data regarding the duration of the videos, date of publication, and number of likes and views were collected. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on video source (health professional, company, or private user), type of information (surgical technique, overview, or anatomy, radiology, and patient experience), and video content (education or patient experience/testimony).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 94 videos were included in the analysis. Of these videos, 88 (93.6%) were published by health professionals, whereas 4 (4.3%) were published by companies and 2 (2.1%) were published by private users. Most of the videos were about surgical technique (57.4%), and almost all the videos (98.9%) had an educational aim, with the exception of 1 video that reported a patient experience (1.1%). The mean length of the videos was 648.4 ± 973.5 seconds, and the mean online period was 34.5 ± 27.0 months. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 32.9 ± 15.9, 1.5 ± 0.9, and 2.3 ± 1.0, respectively. Videos that provided an overview of the ALL were the best in terms of all quality scores and were significantly higher quality than videos about surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience for all scores (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). No difference was found between surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience (DISCERN score, <em>P</em> &gt; .99; JAMA score, <em>P</em> = .839; and GQS, <em>P</em> &gt; .99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The educational content of YouTube videos about the ALL of the knee showed low quality and validity based on the DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>With the growing use of social media by patients to gather information about their medical conditions, it is crucial for orthopaedic health care providers to recognize the limitations of social media videos discussing the ALL as potential sources of knowledge for their patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 101002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24001391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the reliability and quality of the educational content of YouTube videos about the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

Methods

A standard search of the YouTube database was performed. All English-language videos were included for analysis. Video reliability was assessed with the use of the DISCERN tool, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). Data regarding the duration of the videos, date of publication, and number of likes and views were collected. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on video source (health professional, company, or private user), type of information (surgical technique, overview, or anatomy, radiology, and patient experience), and video content (education or patient experience/testimony).

Results

A total of 94 videos were included in the analysis. Of these videos, 88 (93.6%) were published by health professionals, whereas 4 (4.3%) were published by companies and 2 (2.1%) were published by private users. Most of the videos were about surgical technique (57.4%), and almost all the videos (98.9%) had an educational aim, with the exception of 1 video that reported a patient experience (1.1%). The mean length of the videos was 648.4 ± 973.5 seconds, and the mean online period was 34.5 ± 27.0 months. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 32.9 ± 15.9, 1.5 ± 0.9, and 2.3 ± 1.0, respectively. Videos that provided an overview of the ALL were the best in terms of all quality scores and were significantly higher quality than videos about surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience for all scores (P < .001). No difference was found between surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience (DISCERN score, P > .99; JAMA score, P = .839; and GQS, P > .99).

Conclusions

The educational content of YouTube videos about the ALL of the knee showed low quality and validity based on the DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS.

Clinical Relevance

With the growing use of social media by patients to gather information about their medical conditions, it is crucial for orthopaedic health care providers to recognize the limitations of social media videos discussing the ALL as potential sources of knowledge for their patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信