YouTube Videos Provide Low-Quality Educational Content About the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee

Q3 Medicine
Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D , Alessandro Carrozzo M.D , Alessandro Annibaldi M.D , Thais Dutra Vieira M.D , Jae-Sung An M.D , Benjamin Freychet M.D , Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet M.D., Ph.D
{"title":"YouTube Videos Provide Low-Quality Educational Content About the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee","authors":"Riccardo D’Ambrosi M.D ,&nbsp;Alessandro Carrozzo M.D ,&nbsp;Alessandro Annibaldi M.D ,&nbsp;Thais Dutra Vieira M.D ,&nbsp;Jae-Sung An M.D ,&nbsp;Benjamin Freychet M.D ,&nbsp;Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet M.D., Ph.D","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the reliability and quality of the educational content of YouTube videos about the anterolateral ligament (ALL).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A standard search of the YouTube database was performed. All English-language videos were included for analysis. Video reliability was assessed with the use of the DISCERN tool, <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). Data regarding the duration of the videos, date of publication, and number of likes and views were collected. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on video source (health professional, company, or private user), type of information (surgical technique, overview, or anatomy, radiology, and patient experience), and video content (education or patient experience/testimony).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 94 videos were included in the analysis. Of these videos, 88 (93.6%) were published by health professionals, whereas 4 (4.3%) were published by companies and 2 (2.1%) were published by private users. Most of the videos were about surgical technique (57.4%), and almost all the videos (98.9%) had an educational aim, with the exception of 1 video that reported a patient experience (1.1%). The mean length of the videos was 648.4 ± 973.5 seconds, and the mean online period was 34.5 ± 27.0 months. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 32.9 ± 15.9, 1.5 ± 0.9, and 2.3 ± 1.0, respectively. Videos that provided an overview of the ALL were the best in terms of all quality scores and were significantly higher quality than videos about surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience for all scores (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). No difference was found between surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience (DISCERN score, <em>P</em> &gt; .99; JAMA score, <em>P</em> = .839; and GQS, <em>P</em> &gt; .99).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The educational content of YouTube videos about the ALL of the knee showed low quality and validity based on the DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>With the growing use of social media by patients to gather information about their medical conditions, it is crucial for orthopaedic health care providers to recognize the limitations of social media videos discussing the ALL as potential sources of knowledge for their patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 101002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24001391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the reliability and quality of the educational content of YouTube videos about the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

Methods

A standard search of the YouTube database was performed. All English-language videos were included for analysis. Video reliability was assessed with the use of the DISCERN tool, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Score (GQS). Data regarding the duration of the videos, date of publication, and number of likes and views were collected. Furthermore, videos were categorized based on video source (health professional, company, or private user), type of information (surgical technique, overview, or anatomy, radiology, and patient experience), and video content (education or patient experience/testimony).

Results

A total of 94 videos were included in the analysis. Of these videos, 88 (93.6%) were published by health professionals, whereas 4 (4.3%) were published by companies and 2 (2.1%) were published by private users. Most of the videos were about surgical technique (57.4%), and almost all the videos (98.9%) had an educational aim, with the exception of 1 video that reported a patient experience (1.1%). The mean length of the videos was 648.4 ± 973.5 seconds, and the mean online period was 34.5 ± 27.0 months. The mean DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS were 32.9 ± 15.9, 1.5 ± 0.9, and 2.3 ± 1.0, respectively. Videos that provided an overview of the ALL were the best in terms of all quality scores and were significantly higher quality than videos about surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience for all scores (P < .001). No difference was found between surgical technique and anatomy, radiology, and patient experience (DISCERN score, P > .99; JAMA score, P = .839; and GQS, P > .99).

Conclusions

The educational content of YouTube videos about the ALL of the knee showed low quality and validity based on the DISCERN score, JAMA score, and GQS.

Clinical Relevance

With the growing use of social media by patients to gather information about their medical conditions, it is crucial for orthopaedic health care providers to recognize the limitations of social media videos discussing the ALL as potential sources of knowledge for their patients.
YouTube视频提供的关于膝关节前外侧韧带的低质量教育内容
目的评价YouTube视频中有关前外侧韧带(ALL)的教学内容的可靠性和质量。方法对YouTube数据库进行标准检索。所有英语视频都纳入分析。使用DISCERN工具、美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)评估视频可靠性。收集了视频时长、发布日期、点赞和观看次数等数据。此外,根据视频来源(卫生专业人员、公司或私人用户)、信息类型(外科技术、概述或解剖、放射学和患者经验)和视频内容(教育或患者经验/证词)对视频进行分类。结果共纳入94个视频。在这些视频中,88个(93.6%)由卫生专业人员发布,4个(4.3%)由公司发布,2个(2.1%)由私人用户发布。大多数视频是关于手术技术的(57.4%),几乎所有视频(98.9%)都有教育目的,只有1个视频报道了患者的经历(1.1%)。视频的平均长度为648.4±973.5秒,平均在线时间为34.5±27.0个月。患者的平均DISCERN评分、JAMA评分和GQS评分分别为32.9±15.9、1.5±0.9和2.3±1.0。提供ALL概述的视频在所有质量分数方面都是最好的,并且在所有分数方面都明显高于关于外科技术和解剖学、放射学和患者体验的视频(P <;措施)。手术技术与解剖学、放射学和患者经验之间没有差异(DISCERN评分,P >;获得;JAMA评分,P = .839;GQS, P >;获得)。结论基于DISCERN评分、JAMA评分和GQS评分,YouTube视频中关于膝关节ALL的教育内容质量和效度较低。临床相关性随着患者越来越多地使用社交媒体来收集有关其医疗状况的信息,对于骨科医疗保健提供者来说,认识到社交媒体视频讨论ALL作为患者潜在知识来源的局限性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信