In Patients With Bilateral Rotator Cuff Tear, Staged Surgery is Superior to Simultaneous Surgery: A Systematic Review

Q3 Medicine
Gaston Davis B.S. , Usman Zareef B.A. , Andres Perez B.A. , Ryan W. Paul B.S. , Daniel Givner B.S. , Brandon J. Erickson M.D. , Kevin B. Freedman M.D. , Steven B. Cohen M.D. , Fotios P. Tjoumakaris M.D.
{"title":"In Patients With Bilateral Rotator Cuff Tear, Staged Surgery is Superior to Simultaneous Surgery: A Systematic Review","authors":"Gaston Davis B.S. ,&nbsp;Usman Zareef B.A. ,&nbsp;Andres Perez B.A. ,&nbsp;Ryan W. Paul B.S. ,&nbsp;Daniel Givner B.S. ,&nbsp;Brandon J. Erickson M.D. ,&nbsp;Kevin B. Freedman M.D. ,&nbsp;Steven B. Cohen M.D. ,&nbsp;Fotios P. Tjoumakaris M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.101033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To compare revision rates and functional outcomes between patients who underwent staged versus simultaneous bilateral rotator cuff repair (RCR).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines with no institutional review board approval or funding required. The PubMed, SportDiscus, and Ovid Medline databases were queried to identify original research studies evaluating preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes of staged or simultaneous RCR. The following search algorithm was used: ((Bilateral) OR (simultaneous) OR (Staged)) AND (rotator cuff repair). Demographics including the number of male and female patients, age, type of surgical intervention, time between staged surgery, and surgical indication were collected. Variables of interest included pre- and postoperative shoulder pain and functional scores, as well as retear, reoperation, revision, complications, and their rates of occurrence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 594 studies were screened, and 8 studies were included in this systematic review. In total, 11,188 patients (97.5%) underwent staged repair and 286 (2.5%) underwent simultaneous repair. Delaying staged surgery by more than 2 years also had decreased surgical complications such as conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, postoperative infection, venous thromboembolism, and emergency department visits when compared with simultaneous RCR (<em>P</em> ≤ .031) and earlier staging (less than 3 months) (<em>P</em> ≤ .015). In addition, one study found staged RCR had better patient-reported outcome measures (University of California-Los Angeles, Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) when staged greater than 9 months apart.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Staged RCR has superior functional outcomes, decreased surgical complications, as well as lower revision rates than simultaneous RCR.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 101033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24001767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare revision rates and functional outcomes between patients who underwent staged versus simultaneous bilateral rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Methods

This systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines with no institutional review board approval or funding required. The PubMed, SportDiscus, and Ovid Medline databases were queried to identify original research studies evaluating preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes of staged or simultaneous RCR. The following search algorithm was used: ((Bilateral) OR (simultaneous) OR (Staged)) AND (rotator cuff repair). Demographics including the number of male and female patients, age, type of surgical intervention, time between staged surgery, and surgical indication were collected. Variables of interest included pre- and postoperative shoulder pain and functional scores, as well as retear, reoperation, revision, complications, and their rates of occurrence.

Results

Overall, 594 studies were screened, and 8 studies were included in this systematic review. In total, 11,188 patients (97.5%) underwent staged repair and 286 (2.5%) underwent simultaneous repair. Delaying staged surgery by more than 2 years also had decreased surgical complications such as conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, postoperative infection, venous thromboembolism, and emergency department visits when compared with simultaneous RCR (P ≤ .031) and earlier staging (less than 3 months) (P ≤ .015). In addition, one study found staged RCR had better patient-reported outcome measures (University of California-Los Angeles, Constant, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores; P < .001) when staged greater than 9 months apart.

Conclusions

Staged RCR has superior functional outcomes, decreased surgical complications, as well as lower revision rates than simultaneous RCR.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信