Reclassification of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using the new BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA track set demonstrates the superiority of ClinGen ENIGMA Expert Panel specifications over the standard ACMG/AMP classification system

Anna Benet-Pagès , Andreas Laner , Luis R. Nassar , Tobias Wohlfrom , Verena Steinke-Lange , Maximilian Haeussler , Elke Holinski-Feder
{"title":"Reclassification of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 using the new BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA track set demonstrates the superiority of ClinGen ENIGMA Expert Panel specifications over the standard ACMG/AMP classification system","authors":"Anna Benet-Pagès ,&nbsp;Andreas Laner ,&nbsp;Luis R. Nassar ,&nbsp;Tobias Wohlfrom ,&nbsp;Verena Steinke-Lange ,&nbsp;Maximilian Haeussler ,&nbsp;Elke Holinski-Feder","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are considered one of the most significant impediments to the translation of genetic test results into precise clinical recommendations. The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification guidelines established a general framework for the assessment and classification of genetic variants; yet, gene-specific specifications are needed to enable better variant classification to reduce the number of VUS. The process of gene-specific adaptations of the ACMG/AMP codes is led and accompanied by ClinGen and implemented by Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEP). The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) VCEP recently published its specifications for the <em>BRCA1</em> (HGNC:1100) and <em>BRCA2</em> (HGNC:1101) genes. We investigated the differences in reclassification between the ENIGMA specifications and the standard ACMG/AMP classification system in a clinical setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reclassified 121 VUS identified in these genes with the latest annotation data using the standard ACMG/AMP classification system and recommendations from the Sequence Variant Interpretation and the ENIGMA specifications. To simplify the reevaluation process, we have created a University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser track hub that displays the exact data points required for variant classification using the ENIGMA VCEP specifications at the exon and variant level (<span><span>https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/abenet/BRCA.ENIGMA.hg19</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>By comparing the codes used and their different weighting in the 2 approaches, we were able to demonstrate the superiority of the application of ENIGMA VCEP specifications, which resulted in a dramatic reduction of VUS (83.5% ENIGMA VCEP vs 20% ACMG/AMP + Sequence Variant Interpretation).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>For the diagnostic analysis of the <em>BRCA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> genes, the use of the ENIGMA VCEP specifications gives the best possible result in the clinical translation of genetic variants. The University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser <em>BRCA1</em>/<em>BRCA2</em> ENIGMA track set significantly simplified the interpretation process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 101961"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424011075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are considered one of the most significant impediments to the translation of genetic test results into precise clinical recommendations. The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) classification guidelines established a general framework for the assessment and classification of genetic variants; yet, gene-specific specifications are needed to enable better variant classification to reduce the number of VUS. The process of gene-specific adaptations of the ACMG/AMP codes is led and accompanied by ClinGen and implemented by Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEP). The Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) VCEP recently published its specifications for the BRCA1 (HGNC:1100) and BRCA2 (HGNC:1101) genes. We investigated the differences in reclassification between the ENIGMA specifications and the standard ACMG/AMP classification system in a clinical setting.

Methods

We reclassified 121 VUS identified in these genes with the latest annotation data using the standard ACMG/AMP classification system and recommendations from the Sequence Variant Interpretation and the ENIGMA specifications. To simplify the reevaluation process, we have created a University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser track hub that displays the exact data points required for variant classification using the ENIGMA VCEP specifications at the exon and variant level (https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/abenet/BRCA.ENIGMA.hg19).

Results

By comparing the codes used and their different weighting in the 2 approaches, we were able to demonstrate the superiority of the application of ENIGMA VCEP specifications, which resulted in a dramatic reduction of VUS (83.5% ENIGMA VCEP vs 20% ACMG/AMP + Sequence Variant Interpretation).

Conclusion

For the diagnostic analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the use of the ENIGMA VCEP specifications gives the best possible result in the clinical translation of genetic variants. The University of California Santa Cruz Genome Browser BRCA1/BRCA2 ENIGMA track set significantly simplified the interpretation process.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信