Pore-Based Modeling of Hydraulic Conductivity Function of Unsaturated Rooted Soils

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Hao Wang, Rui Chen, Anthony Kwan Leung, Ankit Garg, Zhenliang Jiang
{"title":"Pore-Based Modeling of Hydraulic Conductivity Function of Unsaturated Rooted Soils","authors":"Hao Wang,&nbsp;Rui Chen,&nbsp;Anthony Kwan Leung,&nbsp;Ankit Garg,&nbsp;Zhenliang Jiang","doi":"10.1002/nag.3958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Mualem's approach has been widely used to predict hydraulic conductivity functions (HCFs) of bare soils if a soil water retention curve (SWRC) model is available. The assumption that Mualem's approach holds is that the distribution of soil pores is spatially completely random. Under this assumption, relative hydraulic conductivity (<i>K<sub>r</sub></i>) is determined by the continuance probability of water-filled pores. However, this assumption is not valid for rooted soils, as root growth causes soil particle rearrangement, and thus soil pore rearrangement, altering the probability of pore connectivity. After reconsidering Mualem's assumption, this study attempts to develop a new approach for predicting HCF of rooted soils by modeling the root-induced pore rearrangement and the resultant change in the continuance probability of water-filled pores. Two approaches mentioned were incorporated with a root-dependent SWRC model to express HCF as a function of matric suction. The proposed model was validated against nine sets of measured HCFs from published studies. It was found that the proposed model reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) of <i>K<sub>r</sub></i> and lg <i>K<sub>r</sub></i> by 33% and 53%, respectively, as compared to traditional Mualem's model. Physically, the model's effectiveness depended on soil texture and root type. In fine-textured soils, roots were capable of displacing soil particles, thereby causing soil pore rearrangement. Also, coarse roots with high strength tend to alter pore distribution. After considering the effects of pore-level root-soil interaction on pore rearrangement, the proposed model provided a significant improvement in the prediction of HCF of unsaturated rooted soils.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 7","pages":"1790-1803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3958","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mualem's approach has been widely used to predict hydraulic conductivity functions (HCFs) of bare soils if a soil water retention curve (SWRC) model is available. The assumption that Mualem's approach holds is that the distribution of soil pores is spatially completely random. Under this assumption, relative hydraulic conductivity (Kr) is determined by the continuance probability of water-filled pores. However, this assumption is not valid for rooted soils, as root growth causes soil particle rearrangement, and thus soil pore rearrangement, altering the probability of pore connectivity. After reconsidering Mualem's assumption, this study attempts to develop a new approach for predicting HCF of rooted soils by modeling the root-induced pore rearrangement and the resultant change in the continuance probability of water-filled pores. Two approaches mentioned were incorporated with a root-dependent SWRC model to express HCF as a function of matric suction. The proposed model was validated against nine sets of measured HCFs from published studies. It was found that the proposed model reduced the root mean square error (RMSE) of Kr and lg Kr by 33% and 53%, respectively, as compared to traditional Mualem's model. Physically, the model's effectiveness depended on soil texture and root type. In fine-textured soils, roots were capable of displacing soil particles, thereby causing soil pore rearrangement. Also, coarse roots with high strength tend to alter pore distribution. After considering the effects of pore-level root-soil interaction on pore rearrangement, the proposed model provided a significant improvement in the prediction of HCF of unsaturated rooted soils.

基于孔隙的非饱和根状土水力传导函数模型
Mualem的方法已被广泛用于在土壤保水曲线(SWRC)模型可用的情况下预测裸露土壤的水力传导函数(HCFs)。Mualem方法的假设是,土壤孔隙的分布在空间上是完全随机的。在此假设下,相对导水率(Kr)由充水孔隙的持续概率决定。然而,这一假设并不适用于有根土壤,因为根系生长导致土壤颗粒重排,从而导致土壤孔隙重排,改变了孔隙连通性的概率。在重新考虑Mualem的假设后,本研究试图通过模拟根引起的孔隙重排和由此产生的充满水的孔隙持续概率的变化,建立一种预测根状土壤HCF的新方法。将上述两种方法与根依赖的SWRC模型相结合,以表达HCF作为基质吸力的函数。根据已发表的研究中9组测量的氢氯氟烃,对提出的模型进行了验证。研究发现,与传统的Mualem模型相比,该模型将Kr和lg Kr的均方根误差(RMSE)分别降低了33%和53%。在物理上,模型的有效性取决于土壤质地和根系类型。在细质土壤中,根系能够取代土壤颗粒,从而引起土壤孔隙的重新排列。同时,高强度的粗根会改变孔隙分布。在考虑了孔级根土相互作用对孔隙重排的影响后,该模型对非饱和根土HCF的预测有了显著的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信