Hyosin Kim, Yanping Jiang, Paul R. Duberstein, Fengyan Tang, Elizabeth A. Luth
{"title":"Trust in Physicians and End-of-Life Discussions and Preferences for Place of Care Among US Chinese Older Adults","authors":"Hyosin Kim, Yanping Jiang, Paul R. Duberstein, Fengyan Tang, Elizabeth A. Luth","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Patient trust in physicians is essential for effective end-of-life discussions. Little is known about how Chinese older adults' trust in physicians relates to their end-of-life care discussions and care setting preferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the association between medical trust among Chinese older adults and their views on end-of-life discussions and care setting preferences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis of longitudinal cohort data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly (PINE) using linear mixed-effects logistic and multinomial logistic regressions, adjusting for covariates. Predicted probabilities of outcome measures were reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 2192 Chinese older adult immigrants in greater Chicago participated in the PINE study from 2017 to 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Outcome variables encompass four dimensions of end-of-life care planning: (1) beliefs about the importance of discussions with family; (2) discussions of end-of-life options with family; (3) preference for counseling with a healthcare provider as a resource; and (4) preferred place of care. The main independent variable was trust in physicians. Covariates included age, sex, education, income, years in the United States, living children, self-rated health, and medical conditions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key Results</h3>\n \n <p>Respondents with strong trust were less likely to consider end-of-life discussions with family important (AOR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55–0.88). Those with strong trust were more likely than those with weak trust to value counseling with a healthcare provider for end-of-life discussions with family (AOR = 5.86, 95% CI: 4.65–7.38). Moderate trust was associated with a preference for end-of-life care in a hospital (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.30–2.05) over home care, relative to weak trust.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Older Chinese immigrants with strong trust tended to place less emphasis on end-of-life discussions with family and favored one-on-one counseling with a healthcare provider for end-of-life discussion. Patient education and family engagement in end-of-life discussions led by trusted healthcare providers may be promising approaches to ensure goal-concordant care for this population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 5","pages":"1558-1565"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patient trust in physicians is essential for effective end-of-life discussions. Little is known about how Chinese older adults' trust in physicians relates to their end-of-life care discussions and care setting preferences.
Objective
To examine the association between medical trust among Chinese older adults and their views on end-of-life discussions and care setting preferences.
Design
Secondary analysis of longitudinal cohort data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly (PINE) using linear mixed-effects logistic and multinomial logistic regressions, adjusting for covariates. Predicted probabilities of outcome measures were reported.
Participants
A total of 2192 Chinese older adult immigrants in greater Chicago participated in the PINE study from 2017 to 2020.
Main Measures
Outcome variables encompass four dimensions of end-of-life care planning: (1) beliefs about the importance of discussions with family; (2) discussions of end-of-life options with family; (3) preference for counseling with a healthcare provider as a resource; and (4) preferred place of care. The main independent variable was trust in physicians. Covariates included age, sex, education, income, years in the United States, living children, self-rated health, and medical conditions.
Key Results
Respondents with strong trust were less likely to consider end-of-life discussions with family important (AOR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55–0.88). Those with strong trust were more likely than those with weak trust to value counseling with a healthcare provider for end-of-life discussions with family (AOR = 5.86, 95% CI: 4.65–7.38). Moderate trust was associated with a preference for end-of-life care in a hospital (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.30–2.05) over home care, relative to weak trust.
Conclusions
Older Chinese immigrants with strong trust tended to place less emphasis on end-of-life discussions with family and favored one-on-one counseling with a healthcare provider for end-of-life discussion. Patient education and family engagement in end-of-life discussions led by trusted healthcare providers may be promising approaches to ensure goal-concordant care for this population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.