Myths and facts about alcohol use disorder: a Delphi consensus study.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf035
Sophie Hytner, Daphne Josselin, David Belin, Owen Bowden Jones
{"title":"Myths and facts about alcohol use disorder: a Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Sophie Hytner, Daphne Josselin, David Belin, Owen Bowden Jones","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Educational interventions that counter myths about alcohol use disorder with facts have the potential to reduce public stigma. Few such interventions have hitherto been rigorously developed. Using a Delphi expert consensus method, this study identified myths and facts to include in an intervention targeting the public stigma of alcohol use disorder. Sixteen UK-based experts (four academics, five clinicians and seven experts-by-experience) completed three sequential online survey rounds. The first round was used alongside a systematic review of the literature on public alcohol use disorder stereotypes to develop 13 myth-fact pairs, which participants quantitively scored in subsequent rounds to determine their importance for inclusion. Pairs reaching consensus (>70% agreement) on high importance (mean score, 7-9) challenged beliefs that alcohol use disorder '<i>only affects certain groups'</i>, and that people with alcohol use disorder '<i>cannot recover'</i>, are '<i>to blame'</i> for, and '<i>able to control'</i>, their drinking. The myth-fact pairs scored as most important relate to responsibility- and recovery-based themes and provide a basis for future educational interventions for public alcohol use disorder stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 1","pages":"fcaf035"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educational interventions that counter myths about alcohol use disorder with facts have the potential to reduce public stigma. Few such interventions have hitherto been rigorously developed. Using a Delphi expert consensus method, this study identified myths and facts to include in an intervention targeting the public stigma of alcohol use disorder. Sixteen UK-based experts (four academics, five clinicians and seven experts-by-experience) completed three sequential online survey rounds. The first round was used alongside a systematic review of the literature on public alcohol use disorder stereotypes to develop 13 myth-fact pairs, which participants quantitively scored in subsequent rounds to determine their importance for inclusion. Pairs reaching consensus (>70% agreement) on high importance (mean score, 7-9) challenged beliefs that alcohol use disorder 'only affects certain groups', and that people with alcohol use disorder 'cannot recover', are 'to blame' for, and 'able to control', their drinking. The myth-fact pairs scored as most important relate to responsibility- and recovery-based themes and provide a basis for future educational interventions for public alcohol use disorder stigma.

关于酒精使用障碍的神话和事实:德尔菲共识研究。
用事实反驳有关酒精使用障碍的神话的教育干预措施有可能减少公众的耻辱感。迄今为止,很少有这样的干预措施得到严格的发展。使用德尔菲专家共识法,本研究确定了神话和事实,包括在针对酒精使用障碍的公众耻辱的干预措施。16名英国专家(4名学者、5名临床医生和7名经验专家)完成了三轮连续的在线调查。第一轮与对公共酒精使用障碍刻板印象的文献进行系统回顾一起使用,以形成13对神话-事实,参与者在随后的几轮中对其进行定量评分,以确定其对纳入的重要性。在高重要性(平均得分,7-9)上达成共识(bb0 - 70%同意)的成对结果挑战了酒精使用障碍“只影响某些群体”,以及酒精使用障碍患者“无法康复”、“应该受到指责”和“能够控制”饮酒的观念。神话-事实对被评为最重要的是与责任和康复为基础的主题,并为未来公共酒精使用障碍污名的教育干预提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信