When, where and how should we assess professionalism in undergraduate medical education? Practical tips from an international conference roundtable discussion.

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2024-11-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.20532.1
Caitlin Patterson, Alexandra Goodwin, Kathleen Collins, Scott Oliver, Catherine Paton
{"title":"When, where and how should we assess professionalism in undergraduate medical education? Practical tips from an international conference roundtable discussion.","authors":"Caitlin Patterson, Alexandra Goodwin, Kathleen Collins, Scott Oliver, Catherine Paton","doi":"10.12688/mep.20532.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of professionalism in healthcare disciplines is a challenging and nuanced topic in medical education. The literature, although continually emerging, remains in its infancy in regards to the role of the assessment of professionalism, appropriate timing for assessment, methods to assess professionalism and the benefits and implications of assessment of professionalism. With emergence of healthcare professionalism in both undergraduate and postgraduate curricula and increasing awareness of professionalism's pertinent role in developing as a healthcare practitioner, the concept of assessing this topic is being discussed regularly in international fora, but as yet there is no consensus decision in how best to proceed. The authors have over a decade of experience researching, promoting and delivering healthcare professionalism education. They presented a roundtable discussion to an international panel of medical educators at an international conference. The attendees represented multiple healthcare disciplines. Breakout rooms and pre-determined introductory questions were used to explore the international consensus on current thinking about assessment in healthcare professionalism. This paper presents these findings as practical tips for educators who are considering introducing or extending their assessment of undergraduate professionalism, all of which were taken from the main themes of the discussion. The aim of the paper is to support educators to think about their stance on this often divisive issue, consider their approaches and focus future research to clarify the remaining unknowns.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"14 ","pages":"280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20532.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of professionalism in healthcare disciplines is a challenging and nuanced topic in medical education. The literature, although continually emerging, remains in its infancy in regards to the role of the assessment of professionalism, appropriate timing for assessment, methods to assess professionalism and the benefits and implications of assessment of professionalism. With emergence of healthcare professionalism in both undergraduate and postgraduate curricula and increasing awareness of professionalism's pertinent role in developing as a healthcare practitioner, the concept of assessing this topic is being discussed regularly in international fora, but as yet there is no consensus decision in how best to proceed. The authors have over a decade of experience researching, promoting and delivering healthcare professionalism education. They presented a roundtable discussion to an international panel of medical educators at an international conference. The attendees represented multiple healthcare disciplines. Breakout rooms and pre-determined introductory questions were used to explore the international consensus on current thinking about assessment in healthcare professionalism. This paper presents these findings as practical tips for educators who are considering introducing or extending their assessment of undergraduate professionalism, all of which were taken from the main themes of the discussion. The aim of the paper is to support educators to think about their stance on this often divisive issue, consider their approaches and focus future research to clarify the remaining unknowns.

在本科医学教育中,何时、何地、如何评估专业精神?来自国际会议圆桌讨论的实用技巧。
在医学教育中,专业精神的评估是一个具有挑战性和微妙的话题。文献虽然不断涌现,但在评估专业精神的作用、评估的适当时机、评估专业精神的方法以及评估专业精神的好处和影响方面,仍处于起步阶段。随着本科和研究生课程中医疗保健专业精神的出现,以及人们越来越意识到专业精神在发展成为医疗保健从业者中的相关作用,评估这一主题的概念正在国际论坛上定期讨论,但迄今为止,对于如何最好地进行评估还没有达成共识。作者有超过十年的经验,研究,促进和提供医疗保健专业教育。他们在一次国际会议上向一个国际医学教育小组提出了一次圆桌讨论。与会者代表了多个医疗保健学科。分组讨论室和预先确定的介绍性问题被用来探讨目前国际上对医疗保健专业评估的共识。本文将这些发现作为实用的提示,提供给正在考虑引入或扩展本科专业评估的教育工作者,所有这些都来自讨论的主题。本文的目的是支持教育工作者思考他们在这个经常引起分歧的问题上的立场,考虑他们的方法,并将未来的研究重点放在澄清剩余的未知数上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信