Current Status and Management Strategies of Obstetric Hemorrhage Using Contrast-enhanced Dynamic Computed Tomography in a Representative Tertiary Perinatal Medical Center in Japan.

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
JMA journal Pub Date : 2025-01-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0114
Naohiro Suzuki, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, Haruta Mogami, Maya Komatsu, Masahito Takakura, Ken Shinozuka, Shigeru Ohtsuru, Masaki Mandai, Eiji Kondoh
{"title":"Current Status and Management Strategies of Obstetric Hemorrhage Using Contrast-enhanced Dynamic Computed Tomography in a Representative Tertiary Perinatal Medical Center in Japan.","authors":"Naohiro Suzuki, Yoshitsugu Chigusa, Haruta Mogami, Maya Komatsu, Masahito Takakura, Ken Shinozuka, Shigeru Ohtsuru, Masaki Mandai, Eiji Kondoh","doi":"10.31662/jmaj.2024-0114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality. Our hospital protocol states that patients with obstetric hemorrhage undergo initial imaging with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography (CE-dCT) to ascertain the presence and location of active bleeding, followed by tailored therapeutic interventions. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the prevailing status and clinical outcomes of obstetric hemorrhage cases at our institution, which are characterized by a distinctive, methodical treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 150 patients with obstetric hemorrhage. Clinical information, including bleeding volume, hemorrhage etiology, therapeutic intervention, transfusion quantity, patient outcome, and CE-dCT findings, were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The leading cause of obstetric hemorrhage was atonic bleeding (55%), followed by vaginal hematoma (13%) and retained placenta (11%). The median amount of bleeding was 2,803 mL, and the median volume of red blood cells (RBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) required was 6 units. Blood loss and transfusion volume were similar regardless of the cause of obstetric hemorrhage. Conservative management, such as uterotonics or balloon tamponade, achieved hemostasis in 57% of patients, whereas 43% required invasive interventions, such as transcatheter arterial embolization. CE-dCT was performed on 85% of patients, and extravasation was detected in 53%. Moreover, \"PRACE,\" characterized by Postpartum hemorrhage, Resistance to treatment, and Arterial Contrast Extravasation on CE-dCT scans, potentially requires massive blood transfusions and invasive treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although obstetric hemorrhage encompasses a diverse array of pathologies, medical practitioners must recognize that approximately 3,000 mL of blood is lost and at least 6 units of RBC and FFP are required, irrespective of the cause. CE-dCT plays a pivotal role in elucidating the etiology of obstetric hemorrhage and guiding therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73550,"journal":{"name":"JMA journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799725/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of pregnancy-related mortality. Our hospital protocol states that patients with obstetric hemorrhage undergo initial imaging with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography (CE-dCT) to ascertain the presence and location of active bleeding, followed by tailored therapeutic interventions. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the prevailing status and clinical outcomes of obstetric hemorrhage cases at our institution, which are characterized by a distinctive, methodical treatment approach.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 150 patients with obstetric hemorrhage. Clinical information, including bleeding volume, hemorrhage etiology, therapeutic intervention, transfusion quantity, patient outcome, and CE-dCT findings, were explored.

Results: The leading cause of obstetric hemorrhage was atonic bleeding (55%), followed by vaginal hematoma (13%) and retained placenta (11%). The median amount of bleeding was 2,803 mL, and the median volume of red blood cells (RBC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) required was 6 units. Blood loss and transfusion volume were similar regardless of the cause of obstetric hemorrhage. Conservative management, such as uterotonics or balloon tamponade, achieved hemostasis in 57% of patients, whereas 43% required invasive interventions, such as transcatheter arterial embolization. CE-dCT was performed on 85% of patients, and extravasation was detected in 53%. Moreover, "PRACE," characterized by Postpartum hemorrhage, Resistance to treatment, and Arterial Contrast Extravasation on CE-dCT scans, potentially requires massive blood transfusions and invasive treatment.

Conclusions: Although obstetric hemorrhage encompasses a diverse array of pathologies, medical practitioners must recognize that approximately 3,000 mL of blood is lost and at least 6 units of RBC and FFP are required, irrespective of the cause. CE-dCT plays a pivotal role in elucidating the etiology of obstetric hemorrhage and guiding therapeutic interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信