Miniaturisation of the Daphnia magna immobilisation assay for the reliable testing of low volume samples.

UCL open environment Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3037
Eberhard Küster, George Gyan Addo, Silke Aulhorn, Dana Kühnel
{"title":"Miniaturisation of the <i>Daphnia magna</i> immobilisation assay for the reliable testing of low volume samples.","authors":"Eberhard Küster, George Gyan Addo, Silke Aulhorn, Dana Kühnel","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>International standard test guidelines for the ecotoxicological characterisation of various substances use organisms such as algae, daphnids and fish embryos. These guidelines recommend or use relatively high volumes of water for the process of testing, for example, 200 mL for a complete dose-response relationship in a daphnia assay. However, for various samples such as concentrated extracts from environmental monitoring or leachates from microplastic ageing experiments, the amount of available sample volume is limited, that is, rather in the range of 10-50 mL/biotest. Using the exposure volumes as recommended in test guidelines would not allow to test a range of different concentrations or to repeat tests or use multiple different organismic bioassays. Lower media volumes would allow the testing of more samples (more concentrations per sample, more test repetitions for statistical robustness, etc.) but it may also decrease the possible number of organisms tested in the same volume. Here, we aimed at reducing the test volumes in the acute daphnia assay (using a maximum of 30 mL for a complete dose-response relationship) without impacting animals' sensitivity towards toxicants. A literature review on existing miniaturisation approaches was used as a starting point. Subsequently, assays employing conventional as well as reduced test volumes were compared for 16 selected test substances with a diverse spectrum of lipophilicity. Results showed that there are differences in EC<sub>50</sub> between the two approaches, but that these differences were overall only within a range of a factor of two to three. Further, by retrieving EC<sub>50</sub> values for the genus <i>Daphnia</i> and 16 test substances from the United States Environmental Protection Agency database, we demonstrated that our results are well in line with the general differences in sensitivities.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"7 ","pages":"e3037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

International standard test guidelines for the ecotoxicological characterisation of various substances use organisms such as algae, daphnids and fish embryos. These guidelines recommend or use relatively high volumes of water for the process of testing, for example, 200 mL for a complete dose-response relationship in a daphnia assay. However, for various samples such as concentrated extracts from environmental monitoring or leachates from microplastic ageing experiments, the amount of available sample volume is limited, that is, rather in the range of 10-50 mL/biotest. Using the exposure volumes as recommended in test guidelines would not allow to test a range of different concentrations or to repeat tests or use multiple different organismic bioassays. Lower media volumes would allow the testing of more samples (more concentrations per sample, more test repetitions for statistical robustness, etc.) but it may also decrease the possible number of organisms tested in the same volume. Here, we aimed at reducing the test volumes in the acute daphnia assay (using a maximum of 30 mL for a complete dose-response relationship) without impacting animals' sensitivity towards toxicants. A literature review on existing miniaturisation approaches was used as a starting point. Subsequently, assays employing conventional as well as reduced test volumes were compared for 16 selected test substances with a diverse spectrum of lipophilicity. Results showed that there are differences in EC50 between the two approaches, but that these differences were overall only within a range of a factor of two to three. Further, by retrieving EC50 values for the genus Daphnia and 16 test substances from the United States Environmental Protection Agency database, we demonstrated that our results are well in line with the general differences in sensitivities.

小型水蚤大固定化试验的可靠测试小体积样品。
各种物质的生态毒理学特征的国际标准测试指南使用生物体,如藻类,水蚤和鱼胚胎。这些指南建议或在测试过程中使用相对大体积的水,例如,在水蚤测定中使用200毫升的水来建立完整的剂量-反应关系。然而,对于各种样品,如环境监测的浓缩提取物或微塑料老化实验的渗滤液,可用的样本量是有限的,即在10-50 mL/biotest的范围内。使用测试指南中建议的暴露量将不允许测试一系列不同的浓度或重复测试或使用多种不同的有机生物测定。较低的培养基体积将允许测试更多的样品(每个样品的浓度更高,为了统计稳健性而进行更多的测试重复,等等),但它也可能减少在相同体积中测试的生物体的可能数量。在这里,我们的目标是在不影响动物对毒物的敏感性的情况下减少急性水蚤试验的测试体积(使用最大30ml来完成完整的剂量-反应关系)。文献综述现有的小型化方法被用作起点。随后,对16种具有不同亲脂性谱的选定测试物质进行了采用常规和减少测试体积的分析比较。结果表明,两种方法之间的EC50存在差异,但这些差异总体上仅在2到3个因素的范围内。此外,通过从美国环境保护署数据库中检索水蚤属和16种测试物质的EC50值,我们证明了我们的结果与敏感性的一般差异是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信