Differences in Reporting Suicide Ideation and Attempt: Implications for Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Alexandra Huttle MD, MS , Christina Rombola MA , Ana Ortin-Peralta PhD , Erika L. Abramson MD, MSc , Muhammad Waseem MD , Regina Miranda PhD
{"title":"Differences in Reporting Suicide Ideation and Attempt: Implications for Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care","authors":"Alexandra Huttle MD, MS ,&nbsp;Christina Rombola MA ,&nbsp;Ana Ortin-Peralta PhD ,&nbsp;Erika L. Abramson MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Muhammad Waseem MD ,&nbsp;Regina Miranda PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Pediatricians are uniquely positioned to identify suicide-related risk, yet clinical practices as to when, how, and who gets screened may vary due to differences in policy statements on youth suicide risk screening in primary care. To address these differences, we examined agreement between reports of past suicide ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) across multiple assessment methods and over time. We further explored associations across sociodemographic factors and severity of mental health symptoms on reporting patterns on these methods for adolescents at elevated risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Adolescents (N = 162) with SI and/or SA were recruited from multiple clinical sites in and around New York City. Adolescents completed interviews and self-report measures validated to assess suicide-related risk, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Agreement between questions on verbal interviews over time was fair (κ = 0.38), with adolescents under-reporting lifetime SI as time from a crisis went by. Agreement between questions on self-report measures was moderate (κ = 0.51), with adolescents under-reporting past-month SI on a depression screen compared to a suicide-specific screen. Participants with less severe mental health-related symptoms were significantly less likely to report past-month SI consistently.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study highlights important trends in suicide-related reporting patterns among adolescents at elevated risk for suicide and may have important implications for clinical practice guidelines. To capture more adolescents at risk for suicide, results not only support a universal screening approach using suicide-specific tools but may suggest the need to increase screening frequency in pediatric primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":"25 4","pages":"Article 102795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876285925000208","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Pediatricians are uniquely positioned to identify suicide-related risk, yet clinical practices as to when, how, and who gets screened may vary due to differences in policy statements on youth suicide risk screening in primary care. To address these differences, we examined agreement between reports of past suicide ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) across multiple assessment methods and over time. We further explored associations across sociodemographic factors and severity of mental health symptoms on reporting patterns on these methods for adolescents at elevated risk.

Methods

Adolescents (N = 162) with SI and/or SA were recruited from multiple clinical sites in and around New York City. Adolescents completed interviews and self-report measures validated to assess suicide-related risk, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.

Results

Agreement between questions on verbal interviews over time was fair (κ = 0.38), with adolescents under-reporting lifetime SI as time from a crisis went by. Agreement between questions on self-report measures was moderate (κ = 0.51), with adolescents under-reporting past-month SI on a depression screen compared to a suicide-specific screen. Participants with less severe mental health-related symptoms were significantly less likely to report past-month SI consistently.

Conclusions

This study highlights important trends in suicide-related reporting patterns among adolescents at elevated risk for suicide and may have important implications for clinical practice guidelines. To capture more adolescents at risk for suicide, results not only support a universal screening approach using suicide-specific tools but may suggest the need to increase screening frequency in pediatric primary care.
报告自杀意念和企图的差异:对儿科初级保健自杀风险筛查的意义。
目的:儿科医生在识别自杀相关风险方面具有独特的优势,但由于初级保健中青少年自杀风险筛查政策声明的差异,关于何时、如何以及谁接受筛查的临床实践可能会有所不同。为了解决这些差异,我们检查了过去自杀意念(SI)和自杀企图(SA)报告之间的一致性,这些报告跨越多种评估方法和时间。我们进一步探讨了社会人口因素和心理健康症状严重程度对高危青少年使用这些方法报告模式的影响。方法:从纽约市及其周边的多个临床地点招募患有SI和/或SA的青少年(N = 162)。青少年完成访谈和自我报告测量,以评估自杀相关风险、抑郁症状和焦虑症状。结果:随着时间的推移,口头访谈问题之间的一致性是公平的(κ = 0.38),随着危机时间的推移,青少年少报终身SI。自我报告测量的问题之间的一致性是中等的(κ = 0.51),青少年在抑郁屏幕上低报过去一个月的SI与自杀特定屏幕相比。精神健康相关症状较轻的参与者持续报告过去一个月SI的可能性明显较低。结论:本研究强调了自杀风险高的青少年自杀相关报告模式的重要趋势,可能对临床实践指南具有重要意义。为了捕获更多有自杀风险的青少年,研究结果不仅支持使用针对自杀的工具进行普遍筛查,而且可能建议在儿科初级保健中增加筛查频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信