Differences in Reporting Suicide Ideation and Attempt: Implications for Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Alexandra Huttle, Christina Rombola, Ana Ortin-Peralta, Erika L Abramson, Muhammad Waseem, Regina Miranda
{"title":"Differences in Reporting Suicide Ideation and Attempt: Implications for Suicide Risk Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.","authors":"Alexandra Huttle, Christina Rombola, Ana Ortin-Peralta, Erika L Abramson, Muhammad Waseem, Regina Miranda","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2025.102795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pediatricians are uniquely positioned to identify suicide-related risk, yet clinical practices as to when, how, and who gets screened may vary due to differences in policy statements on youth suicide risk screening in primary care. To address these differences, we examined agreement between reports of past suicide ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) across multiple assessment methods and over time. We further explored associations across sociodemographic factors and severity of mental health symptoms on reporting patterns on these methods for adolescents at elevated risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescents (N = 162) with SI and/or SA were recruited from multiple clinical sites in and around New York City. Adolescents completed interviews and self-report measures validated to assess suicide-related risk, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between questions on verbal interviews over time was fair (κ = 0.38), with adolescents under-reporting lifetime SI as time from a crisis went by. Agreement between questions on self-report measures was moderate (κ = 0.51), with adolescents under-reporting past-month SI on a depression screen compared to a suicide-specific screen. Participants with less severe mental health-related symptoms were significantly less likely to report past-month SI consistently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights important trends in suicide-related reporting patterns among adolescents at elevated risk for suicide and may have important implications for clinical practice guidelines. To capture more adolescents at risk for suicide, results not only support a universal screening approach using suicide-specific tools but may suggest the need to increase screening frequency in pediatric primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"102795"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2025.102795","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pediatricians are uniquely positioned to identify suicide-related risk, yet clinical practices as to when, how, and who gets screened may vary due to differences in policy statements on youth suicide risk screening in primary care. To address these differences, we examined agreement between reports of past suicide ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) across multiple assessment methods and over time. We further explored associations across sociodemographic factors and severity of mental health symptoms on reporting patterns on these methods for adolescents at elevated risk.

Methods: Adolescents (N = 162) with SI and/or SA were recruited from multiple clinical sites in and around New York City. Adolescents completed interviews and self-report measures validated to assess suicide-related risk, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms.

Results: Agreement between questions on verbal interviews over time was fair (κ = 0.38), with adolescents under-reporting lifetime SI as time from a crisis went by. Agreement between questions on self-report measures was moderate (κ = 0.51), with adolescents under-reporting past-month SI on a depression screen compared to a suicide-specific screen. Participants with less severe mental health-related symptoms were significantly less likely to report past-month SI consistently.

Conclusions: This study highlights important trends in suicide-related reporting patterns among adolescents at elevated risk for suicide and may have important implications for clinical practice guidelines. To capture more adolescents at risk for suicide, results not only support a universal screening approach using suicide-specific tools but may suggest the need to increase screening frequency in pediatric primary care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信