Hip Arthroscopy Patients with Concomitant Low Back Pain Show Clinical Improvement and Time-Dependent Survivorship Comparable to Those Without Low Back Pain: A Propensity Matched Study at Long-Term Follow-Up.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jesus E Cervantes, Eric Hu, Nicholas Lemme, Shane J Nho
{"title":"Hip Arthroscopy Patients with Concomitant Low Back Pain Show Clinical Improvement and Time-Dependent Survivorship Comparable to Those Without Low Back Pain: A Propensity Matched Study at Long-Term Follow-Up.","authors":"Jesus E Cervantes, Eric Hu, Nicholas Lemme, Shane J Nho","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship at long-term follow-up following primary hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without preoperative lower back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repository was reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary HA for FAIS between 1/2012-5/2014 with 10-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included prior ipsilateral hip surgery, concomitant procedures, congenital hip disorders, non-FAIS hip pathologies, Tönnis grade >1, history of platelet-rich plasma injections, and missing 10-year follow-up. Patients that self-reported preoperative, concomitant LBP were propensity-matched 1:1 to non-LBP patients by age, sex, and body-mass-index (BMI). PROs collected included Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living and Sports Subscale (HOS-ADL/HOS-SS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain and Satisfaction. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared. Subgroup analysis was conducted comparing females and males with LBP. Reoperation-free survivorship was compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis. An a priori power analysis determined sample size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 69 hips in 67 LBP patients were matched to 69 hips in 67 non-LBP patients. Demographics were similar between groups, including age (39.22±10.3 vs. 38.99±10.7 years, P=0.90), sex (55.1% vs. 55.1% female, P=1.0), and BMI (26.15±4.6 vs. 26.36±5.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, P=0.80). Average follow-up duration was 10.43±0.4 years. The most common cause of LBP was degenerative lumbar or sacral conditions, including degenerative disc disease (DDD), degenerative joint disease (DJD), or spondylosis, accounting for 38.8% (26/69) of the cohort. Mean preoperative HOS-ADL (62.38±18.7 vs. 64.45±21.1, P=0.57), HOS-SS (37.83±22.6 vs. 45.67±24.7, P=0.09), mHHS (53.63±14.6 vs. 57.01±14.6, P=0.22), iHOT-12 (33.29±19.0 vs. 39.49±15.8, P=0.27), and VAS Pain (71.88±18.3 vs. 71.87±19.1, P=1.0) were similar between LBP and non-LBP patients. Additionally, the mean 10-year follow-up HOS-ADL (81.48±21.2 vs. 79.57±22.0, P=0.66), HOS-SS (66.87±31.3 vs. 67.36±30.4, P=0.94), mHHS (74.15±18.8 vs. 73.19±17.7, P=0.79), iHOT-12 (77.77±23.3 vs. 69.63±29.3, P=0.13), VAS Pain (23.98±25.0 vs. 32.19±28.4, P=0.11), and VAS Satisfaction (83.47±25.3 vs. 81.43±29.7, P=0.73) were similar between LBP and non-LBP patients. LBP and non-LBP patients had comparable MCID achievement for HOS-ADL (72% vs. 56%, P=0.13), HOS-SS (74% vs. 50%, P=0.06), mHHS (74% vs. 65%, P=0.47), iHOT-12 (83% vs. 72%, P=0.67), VAS Pain (89% vs. 75%, P=0.10), and any PRO (98% vs. 93%, P=0.32). Similarly, LBP and non-LBP patients had comparable PASS achievement for HOS-ADL (64% vs. 65%, P=1.0), HOS-SS (66% vs. 69%, P=0.83), mHHS (64% vs. 60%, P=0.84), iHOT-12 (65% vs 61%, P=0.84), VAS Pain (55% vs. 50%, P=0.71), and any PRO (76% vs. 80%, P=0.81). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between females and males with LBP in preoperative or 10-year follow-up PROs as well as MCID and PASS achievement rates. Reoperation-free survivorship was comparable (P=1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing primary HA for FAIS with concomitant LBP may achieve comparable PROs, CSOs, and reoperation-free time-dependent survivorship to patients without LBP at long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Retrospective, Matched Case-Control Study, Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and reoperation-free survivorship at long-term follow-up following primary hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without preoperative lower back pain (LBP).

Methods: A repository was reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary HA for FAIS between 1/2012-5/2014 with 10-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria included prior ipsilateral hip surgery, concomitant procedures, congenital hip disorders, non-FAIS hip pathologies, Tönnis grade >1, history of platelet-rich plasma injections, and missing 10-year follow-up. Patients that self-reported preoperative, concomitant LBP were propensity-matched 1:1 to non-LBP patients by age, sex, and body-mass-index (BMI). PROs collected included Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living and Sports Subscale (HOS-ADL/HOS-SS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain and Satisfaction. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared. Subgroup analysis was conducted comparing females and males with LBP. Reoperation-free survivorship was compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis. An a priori power analysis determined sample size.

Results: Overall, 69 hips in 67 LBP patients were matched to 69 hips in 67 non-LBP patients. Demographics were similar between groups, including age (39.22±10.3 vs. 38.99±10.7 years, P=0.90), sex (55.1% vs. 55.1% female, P=1.0), and BMI (26.15±4.6 vs. 26.36±5.1 kg/m2, P=0.80). Average follow-up duration was 10.43±0.4 years. The most common cause of LBP was degenerative lumbar or sacral conditions, including degenerative disc disease (DDD), degenerative joint disease (DJD), or spondylosis, accounting for 38.8% (26/69) of the cohort. Mean preoperative HOS-ADL (62.38±18.7 vs. 64.45±21.1, P=0.57), HOS-SS (37.83±22.6 vs. 45.67±24.7, P=0.09), mHHS (53.63±14.6 vs. 57.01±14.6, P=0.22), iHOT-12 (33.29±19.0 vs. 39.49±15.8, P=0.27), and VAS Pain (71.88±18.3 vs. 71.87±19.1, P=1.0) were similar between LBP and non-LBP patients. Additionally, the mean 10-year follow-up HOS-ADL (81.48±21.2 vs. 79.57±22.0, P=0.66), HOS-SS (66.87±31.3 vs. 67.36±30.4, P=0.94), mHHS (74.15±18.8 vs. 73.19±17.7, P=0.79), iHOT-12 (77.77±23.3 vs. 69.63±29.3, P=0.13), VAS Pain (23.98±25.0 vs. 32.19±28.4, P=0.11), and VAS Satisfaction (83.47±25.3 vs. 81.43±29.7, P=0.73) were similar between LBP and non-LBP patients. LBP and non-LBP patients had comparable MCID achievement for HOS-ADL (72% vs. 56%, P=0.13), HOS-SS (74% vs. 50%, P=0.06), mHHS (74% vs. 65%, P=0.47), iHOT-12 (83% vs. 72%, P=0.67), VAS Pain (89% vs. 75%, P=0.10), and any PRO (98% vs. 93%, P=0.32). Similarly, LBP and non-LBP patients had comparable PASS achievement for HOS-ADL (64% vs. 65%, P=1.0), HOS-SS (66% vs. 69%, P=0.83), mHHS (64% vs. 60%, P=0.84), iHOT-12 (65% vs 61%, P=0.84), VAS Pain (55% vs. 50%, P=0.71), and any PRO (76% vs. 80%, P=0.81). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between females and males with LBP in preoperative or 10-year follow-up PROs as well as MCID and PASS achievement rates. Reoperation-free survivorship was comparable (P=1.0).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing primary HA for FAIS with concomitant LBP may achieve comparable PROs, CSOs, and reoperation-free time-dependent survivorship to patients without LBP at long-term follow-up.

Level of evidence: Retrospective, Matched Case-Control Study, Level III.

目的:本研究的目的是评估患者报告的结果(PROs)、临床显著结果(CSOs)的实现情况以及长期随访时无再手术的存活率,无论患者术前是否伴有下背痛(LBP):方法: 对资料库进行审查,以确定在 2012 年 1 月至 2014 年 5 月期间因股骨髋臼撞击综合征接受初级髋关节镜手术并随访 10 年的患者。排除标准包括曾接受同侧髋关节手术、伴随手术、先天性髋关节疾病、非FAIS髋关节病变、Tönnis分级>1、富血小板血浆注射史以及缺少10年随访。根据年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI),将术前自述伴有髋关节疼痛的患者与非髋关节疼痛患者进行1:1倾向性匹配。收集的PRO包括髋关节结果评分-日常生活活动和运动分量表(HOS-ADL/HOS-SS)、12项国际髋关节结果工具(iHOT-12)、改良哈里斯髋关节评分(mHHS)以及疼痛和满意度视觉模拟量表(VAS)。比较了最小临床意义差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)。对患有腰椎间盘突出症的女性和男性进行了分组分析。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较了无再手术生存率。先验功率分析确定了样本量:总体而言,67 名腰椎间盘突出症患者的 69 个髋关节与 67 名非腰椎间盘突出症患者的 69 个髋关节相匹配。两组患者的人口统计学特征相似,包括年龄(39.22±10.3 vs. 38.99±10.7岁,P=0.90)、性别(55.1% vs. 55.1%为女性,P=1.0)和体重指数(26.15±4.6 vs. 26.36±5.1kg/m2,P=0.80)。平均随访时间为(10.43±0.4)年。最常见的腰痛原因是腰椎或骶椎退行性病变,包括椎间盘退行性病变(DDD)、关节退行性病变(DJD)或脊椎病,占38.8%(26/69)。术前平均 HOS-ADL (62.38±18.7 vs. 64.45±21.1,P=0.57)、HOS-SS (37.83±22.6 vs. 45.67±24.7,P=0.09)、mHHS (53.63±14.6 vs. 57.01±14.6,P=0.22)、iHOT-12(33.29±19.0 vs. 39.49±15.8,P=0.27)和 VAS 疼痛(71.88±18.3 vs. 71.87±19.1,P=1.0)在 LBP 和非 LBP 患者之间相似。此外,10 年随访平均 HOS-ADL (81.48±21.2 vs. 79.57±22.0,P=0.66)、HOS-SS(66.87±31.3 vs. 67.36±30.4,P=0.94)、mHHS(74.15±18.8 vs. 73.19±17.7,P=0.79)、iHOT-12(77.77±23.3 vs. 69.63±29.3,P=0.13)、VAS 疼痛(23.98±25.0 vs. 32.19±28.4,P=0.11)和 VAS 满意度(83.47±25.3 vs. 81.43±29.7,P=0.73)在 LBP 和非 LBP 患者之间相似。肺结核患者和非肺结核患者在 HOS-ADL (72% vs. 56%, P=0.13)、HOS-SS (74% vs. 50%, P=0.06)、mHHS (74% vs. 65%, P=0.47)、iHOT-12 (83% vs. 72%, P=0.67)、VAS 疼痛 (89% vs. 75%, P=0.10)和任何 PRO (98% vs. 93%, P=0.32)方面的 MCID 成绩相当。同样,LBP 和非 LBP 患者在 HOS-ADL (64% vs. 65%, P=1.0)、HOS-SS (66% vs. 69%, P=0.83)、mHHS (64% vs. 60%, P=0.84)、iHOT-12 (65% vs. 61%, P=0.84)、VAS 疼痛 (55% vs. 50%, P=0.71)和任何 PRO (76% vs. 80%, P=0.81)方面的 PASS 成绩相当。亚组分析显示,女性和男性腰椎间盘突出症患者在术前或10年随访PROs以及MCID和PASS达标率方面没有明显差异。无再手术生存率相当(P=1.0):结论:因FAIS并发腰椎间盘突出症而接受初级HA手术的患者在长期随访中的PROs、CSOs和无再手术时间依赖性存活率与无腰椎间盘突出症的患者相当:回顾性、匹配病例对照研究,III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信