Educational outcomes of children with major congenital anomalies: Study protocol for a population-based cohort study using linked hospital and education data from England.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2024-11-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13750.1
Joachim Tan, Ayana Cant, Kate Lewis, Vincent Nguyen, Ania Zylbersztejn, Laura Gimeno, Pia Hardelid, Bianca De Stavola, Katie Harron, Ruth Gilbert
{"title":"Educational outcomes of children with major congenital anomalies: Study protocol for a population-based cohort study using linked hospital and education data from England.","authors":"Joachim Tan, Ayana Cant, Kate Lewis, Vincent Nguyen, Ania Zylbersztejn, Laura Gimeno, Pia Hardelid, Bianca De Stavola, Katie Harron, Ruth Gilbert","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13750.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major congenital anomalies (CAs) affect around 2% of live births and are a primary cause of infant mortality, childhood morbidity and long-term disability, often requiring hospitalisation and/or surgery. Children with CAs are at greater risk of lower educational attainment compared with their peers, which could be due to learning disabilities, higher rates of ill-health and school absences, or lack of adequate educational support. Our study will compare the educational attainment of children with CAs to those of their peers up to age 11 in England, using linked administrative health and education data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will analyse data from the ECHILD (Education and Child Health Insights from Linked Data) database. Children born in NHS-funded hospitals from 1st September 2003 to 31st August 2008 whose hospital records were linked to their educational records at three Key Stages (ages 4/5, 6/7 and 10/11 years) will be included. Children with different CAs, indicated by recorded hospital diagnosis codes, will be compared to children without CAs. We will compare the proportions of enrolled children who take the assessment, the proportions who reached national expected levels of attainment, and the mean standardised attainment scores for Maths and English at each Key Stage. We will describe variations in outcome by sex, ethnic minority background, region, and neighbourhood deprivation, and perform regression modelling to compare the attainment trajectories of children with and without CAs, controlling for sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethics approval has been obtained for the analyses of the ECHILD database. Our findings will provide information for parents regarding their children's expected academic potential, and also enable the development of interventions to support those at risk of not doing well. We will disseminate our findings to academics, policy makers, service users and providers through seminars, peer-reviewed publications, conference abstracts and other media (lay summaries and infographics).</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"4 ","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11803390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13750.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major congenital anomalies (CAs) affect around 2% of live births and are a primary cause of infant mortality, childhood morbidity and long-term disability, often requiring hospitalisation and/or surgery. Children with CAs are at greater risk of lower educational attainment compared with their peers, which could be due to learning disabilities, higher rates of ill-health and school absences, or lack of adequate educational support. Our study will compare the educational attainment of children with CAs to those of their peers up to age 11 in England, using linked administrative health and education data.

Methods: We will analyse data from the ECHILD (Education and Child Health Insights from Linked Data) database. Children born in NHS-funded hospitals from 1st September 2003 to 31st August 2008 whose hospital records were linked to their educational records at three Key Stages (ages 4/5, 6/7 and 10/11 years) will be included. Children with different CAs, indicated by recorded hospital diagnosis codes, will be compared to children without CAs. We will compare the proportions of enrolled children who take the assessment, the proportions who reached national expected levels of attainment, and the mean standardised attainment scores for Maths and English at each Key Stage. We will describe variations in outcome by sex, ethnic minority background, region, and neighbourhood deprivation, and perform regression modelling to compare the attainment trajectories of children with and without CAs, controlling for sociodemographic factors.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained for the analyses of the ECHILD database. Our findings will provide information for parents regarding their children's expected academic potential, and also enable the development of interventions to support those at risk of not doing well. We will disseminate our findings to academics, policy makers, service users and providers through seminars, peer-reviewed publications, conference abstracts and other media (lay summaries and infographics).

重大先天性异常儿童的教育结果:一项基于人群的队列研究的研究方案,使用来自英国的相关医院和教育数据。
背景:重大先天性异常(CAs)影响约2%的活产,是婴儿死亡、儿童发病和长期残疾的主要原因,通常需要住院和/或手术。与同龄人相比,患有残疾的儿童受教育程度较低的风险更大,这可能是由于学习障碍、健康状况不佳和缺课率较高,或缺乏适当的教育支持。我们的研究将使用相关的行政健康和教育数据,将患有ca的儿童的受教育程度与英国11岁以下的同龄人进行比较。方法:我们将分析来自ECHILD(教育和儿童健康洞察关联数据)数据库的数据。2003年9月1日至2008年8月31日在nhs资助的医院出生的儿童,其医院记录与其三个关键阶段(4/5岁、6/7岁和10/11岁)的教育记录相关联,将被纳入其中。将记录医院诊断代码的不同ca患儿与无ca患儿进行比较。我们将比较参加评估的入学儿童的比例,达到国家预期成绩水平的比例,以及每个关键阶段数学和英语的平均标准化成绩。我们将根据性别、少数民族背景、地区和邻里剥夺来描述结果的变化,并执行回归模型来比较有和没有ca的儿童的成就轨迹,控制社会人口因素。伦理和传播:对ECHILD数据库的分析已获得伦理批准。我们的研究结果将为家长提供有关他们孩子的预期学术潜力的信息,并使干预措施的发展能够支持那些有表现不佳风险的人。我们将通过研讨会、同行评议出版物、会议摘要和其他媒体(概要和信息图表)向学术界、政策制定者、服务用户和提供者传播我们的研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信