[Impact of Imaging and Reconstruction Parameters for Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Three-dimensional Star Shot Using an X-ray CT-based Gel Dosimeter].

Shinichi Takahashi, Hidenobu Tachibana, Riki Oshika, Rie Tachibana, Masashi Itou
{"title":"[Impact of Imaging and Reconstruction Parameters for Cone-beam Computed Tomography on Three-dimensional Star Shot Using an X-ray CT-based Gel Dosimeter].","authors":"Shinichi Takahashi, Hidenobu Tachibana, Riki Oshika, Rie Tachibana, Masashi Itou","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.25-1465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have not demonstrated the influence of various imaging acquisition and reconstruction conditions on three-dimensional star shot analysis using an X-ray-based gel dosimeter. Therefore, we investigated the effects of image acquisition and reconstruction conditions on the method in this study and evaluated the robustness of the method. Firstly, we set a reference condition (80 kVp, 1080 mAs, full fan, full trajectory, 1800 projection number, iterative reconstruction) and nine other comparison conditions (80-125 kVp, 540-2160 mAs, half or full fan, full or half trajectory, 420-5400 projection number and iterative reconstruction or filtered back projection). Cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed under each condition before and after irradiation of the single gel dosimeter, and the position of the radiation isocenter relative to the image isocenter, beam isocentricity, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured. The differences compared to the reference were as follows: for isocenter distance, 0.0±0.1 mm on the X-axis, 0.0±0.2 mm on the Y-axis, and 0.1±0.3 mm on the Z-axis. The beam isocentricity was 0.0±0.2 mm. The CNR ranged from a maximum of 5.8 to a minimum of 2.6 in median comparisons. In contrast, compared to the results under the reference condition, the results under other conditions matched within a range of ±0.25 mm. This investigation showed that analysis is feasible within an uncertainty of 0.25 mm under imaging conditions where CNR is 3 or higher.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":"81 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.25-1465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have not demonstrated the influence of various imaging acquisition and reconstruction conditions on three-dimensional star shot analysis using an X-ray-based gel dosimeter. Therefore, we investigated the effects of image acquisition and reconstruction conditions on the method in this study and evaluated the robustness of the method. Firstly, we set a reference condition (80 kVp, 1080 mAs, full fan, full trajectory, 1800 projection number, iterative reconstruction) and nine other comparison conditions (80-125 kVp, 540-2160 mAs, half or full fan, full or half trajectory, 420-5400 projection number and iterative reconstruction or filtered back projection). Cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed under each condition before and after irradiation of the single gel dosimeter, and the position of the radiation isocenter relative to the image isocenter, beam isocentricity, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured. The differences compared to the reference were as follows: for isocenter distance, 0.0±0.1 mm on the X-axis, 0.0±0.2 mm on the Y-axis, and 0.1±0.3 mm on the Z-axis. The beam isocentricity was 0.0±0.2 mm. The CNR ranged from a maximum of 5.8 to a minimum of 2.6 in median comparisons. In contrast, compared to the results under the reference condition, the results under other conditions matched within a range of ±0.25 mm. This investigation showed that analysis is feasible within an uncertainty of 0.25 mm under imaging conditions where CNR is 3 or higher.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信