The Development of Publications on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Bibliometric Analysis.

IF 2.8 3区医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S493703

Wencai Jiang, Xuemeng Chen, Yanhua Peng, Wenhu Zhai, Xianjie Zhang, Yukai Zhou, Rui Zhou

{"title":"The Development of Publications on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Bibliometric Analysis.","authors":"Wencai Jiang, Xuemeng Chen, Yanhua Peng, Wenhu Zhai, Xianjie Zhang, Yukai Zhou, Rui Zhou","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S493703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is a risk factor that impacts postoperative recovery and still troubles patients and healthcare staff. The present study is a bibliometric analysis of CRBD.Methods: The publications on CRBD were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer and Excel were applied to present the current status and hot spots of CRBD research. We analyzed parameters such as the annual number of publications, countries/regions, organizations, authors, journals, and keywords of the articles in this area by generating visualization graphs.Results: A total of 127 articles were eligible, recorded by 78 journals, and drafted by 672 authors from 169 organizations in 26 countries/regions. The main type of these articles is randomized trial. Park Hee-Pyoung, Kim Hyun-Chang, and Cui Yuanshan are the most productive authors with 5 articles. Sichuan University, Seoul National University, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, and Qingdao University published more articles on CRBD worldwide. China ranks No. 1 in terms of the number of publications, followed by South Korea and India. Journals specialized in anesthesiology, such as BMC Anesthesiology, Journal of Anesthesia, and British Journal of Anesthesia, are more popular with researchers in this area. The research hot spots of CRBD have concentrated on the prevention and treatment of CRBD.Conclusion: Though formal research on CRBD started late, there is a rising tendency for the number of publications. Authors and academic teams from Asia have made significant contribution to CRBD. Journals specialized in anesthesiology are priorities for publishing articles. Previous studies mainly focused on the pharmacological and pharmacological methods to CRBD. However, CRBD is not fully settled. Either clinical or experimental studies are still needed to further improve CRBD.","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11806727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S493703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) is a risk factor that impacts postoperative recovery and still troubles patients and healthcare staff. The present study is a bibliometric analysis of CRBD.

Methods: The publications on CRBD were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer and Excel were applied to present the current status and hot spots of CRBD research. We analyzed parameters such as the annual number of publications, countries/regions, organizations, authors, journals, and keywords of the articles in this area by generating visualization graphs.

Results: A total of 127 articles were eligible, recorded by 78 journals, and drafted by 672 authors from 169 organizations in 26 countries/regions. The main type of these articles is randomized trial. Park Hee-Pyoung, Kim Hyun-Chang, and Cui Yuanshan are the most productive authors with 5 articles. Sichuan University, Seoul National University, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, and Qingdao University published more articles on CRBD worldwide. China ranks No. 1 in terms of the number of publications, followed by South Korea and India. Journals specialized in anesthesiology, such as BMC Anesthesiology, Journal of Anesthesia, and British Journal of Anesthesia, are more popular with researchers in this area. The research hot spots of CRBD have concentrated on the prevention and treatment of CRBD.

Conclusion: Though formal research on CRBD started late, there is a rising tendency for the number of publications. Authors and academic teams from Asia have made significant contribution to CRBD. Journals specialized in anesthesiology are priorities for publishing articles. Previous studies mainly focused on the pharmacological and pharmacological methods to CRBD. However, CRBD is not fully settled. Either clinical or experimental studies are still needed to further improve CRBD.

查看原文本刊更多论文

导尿管相关膀胱不适出版物的发展：文献计量分析。

背景：导尿管相关性膀胱不适（CRBD）是影响术后恢复的危险因素，仍然困扰着患者和医护人员。本研究是对CRBD的文献计量分析。方法：检索Web of Science Core Collection中有关CRBD的出版物。应用VOSviewer和Excel介绍了CRBD的研究现状和热点。我们通过生成可视化图表，分析了该领域文章的年发表数量、国家/地区、组织、作者、期刊、关键词等参数。结果：共有127篇文章入选，收录于78种期刊，由来自26个国家/地区169个机构的672位作者撰写。这些文章的主要类型是随机试验。朴熙平、金贤昌和崔元山是最多产的作者，有5篇文章。四川大学、首尔大学、圣贾伊甘地医学研究生院、首都医科大学、青岛大学在全球范围内发表了更多的CRBD文章。中国在发表论文数量方面排名第一，其次是韩国和印度。《BMC麻醉学》、《Journal of Anesthesia》和《British Journal of Anesthesia》等麻醉学专业期刊在该领域的研究人员中更受欢迎。CRBD的研究热点主要集中在CRBD的防治上。结论：虽然CRBD的正式研究起步较晚，但发表数量呈上升趋势。来自亚洲的作者和学术团队为CRBD做出了重要贡献。麻醉学专业期刊是发表文章的优先选择。以往的研究主要集中在CRBD的药理学和药理学方法上。然而，CRBD并没有完全解决。进一步改善CRBD仍需临床或实验研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

3.60%

发文量

139

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.