Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Guanjie Zeng, Zongze Li, Juedong Hou, Liu Yu, Yuhui Cui, Yongjian Zhu, Ling Yao, Jiarui Chen, Yongquan Cheng, Jianting Chen
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Screw Fixation Combined With Endoscopic Bone Graft in the Minimally Invasive Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Guanjie Zeng, Zongze Li, Juedong Hou, Liu Yu, Yuhui Cui, Yongjian Zhu, Ling Yao, Jiarui Chen, Yongquan Cheng, Jianting Chen","doi":"10.1111/os.14368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Spondylolysis, often progressing to spondylolisthesis, commonly defies conservative treatment in refractory cases, indicating a need for surgery. Robot-assisted techniques may provide a stable and effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. To compare the clinical efficacy between robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft and conventional open screw fixation with bone graft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort study involving 43 individuals with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent surgical treatment was conducted. From January 2022 to June 2023, 20 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft while 23 patients underwent conventional open screw fixation with bone graft. The demographic data, parameters related to robotic surgery, perioperative indicators, VAS and ODI scores, pedicle screw accuracy, radiographic fusion outcomes, and follow-up results were systematically recorded, analyzed, and then compared between the two groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests following normality assessment, with statistical significance at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the conventional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure dose (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the duration of the surgery was longer. Postoperative imaging findings showed high screw accuracy in both groups, with a grade A rate of 95% in the robot-assisted group compared with 91.4% in the conventional open surgery group according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Both groups achieved similar improvements in VAS and ODI during 1-year follow-up, and both groups achieved good bone graft fusion (97.5% fusion rate in the robot-assisted group versus 93.5% in the conventional open surgery group).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robot-assisted screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft provides a safe and reliable minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, with high accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and less radiation exposure dose, less intraoperative trauma, and quicker recovery than conventional open surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Spondylolysis, often progressing to spondylolisthesis, commonly defies conservative treatment in refractory cases, indicating a need for surgery. Robot-assisted techniques may provide a stable and effective minimally invasive approach for the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. To compare the clinical efficacy between robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft and conventional open screw fixation with bone graft in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis.

Methods: A cohort study involving 43 individuals with lumbar spondylolysis who underwent surgical treatment was conducted. From January 2022 to June 2023, 20 patients underwent percutaneous screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft while 23 patients underwent conventional open screw fixation with bone graft. The demographic data, parameters related to robotic surgery, perioperative indicators, VAS and ODI scores, pedicle screw accuracy, radiographic fusion outcomes, and follow-up results were systematically recorded, analyzed, and then compared between the two groups. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were evaluated with t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests following normality assessment, with statistical significance at p < 0.05.

Results: Compared with the conventional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative drainage, shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure dose (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, the duration of the surgery was longer. Postoperative imaging findings showed high screw accuracy in both groups, with a grade A rate of 95% in the robot-assisted group compared with 91.4% in the conventional open surgery group according to the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Both groups achieved similar improvements in VAS and ODI during 1-year follow-up, and both groups achieved good bone graft fusion (97.5% fusion rate in the robot-assisted group versus 93.5% in the conventional open surgery group).

Conclusion: Robot-assisted screw fixation combined with endoscopic bone graft provides a safe and reliable minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spondylolysis, with high accuracy of pedicle screw implantation and less radiation exposure dose, less intraoperative trauma, and quicker recovery than conventional open surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信