A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
John P Forrester, Manuel Beltran Del Rio, Cristine H Meyer, Samuel P R Paci, Ella R Rastegar, Timmy Li, Maria G Sfakianos, Eric N Klein, Matthew E Bank, Daniel M Rolston, Nathan A Christopherson, Daniel Jafari
{"title":"A Combined Model of Vital Signs and Serum Biomarkers Outperforms Shock Index in the Prediction of Hemorrhage Control Interventions in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients.","authors":"John P Forrester, Manuel Beltran Del Rio, Cristine H Meyer, Samuel P R Paci, Ella R Rastegar, Timmy Li, Maria G Sfakianos, Eric N Klein, Matthew E Bank, Daniel M Rolston, Nathan A Christopherson, Daniel Jafari","doi":"10.1177/08850666241312614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ongoing bleeding who require hemorrhage control interventions (HCI) can be challenging. Guidelines recommend risk-stratification with clinical variables and prediction tools, however supporting evidence remains mixed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated adult patients admitted to the surgical ICU with concern for ongoing hemorrhage under our institution's \"Hemorrhage Watch\" (HW) protocol and aimed to derive a clinical prediction model identifying those needing HCI with serial vital signs (VS) and serum biomarkers. The HW protocol included ICU admission followed by a 3-h observation period with VS monitoring every 15 min and hourly biomarkers. The primary outcome was the need for HCI (operative and endovascular interventions) within nine hours of ICU arrival. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, blood transfusions, and ICU and hospital length-of-stay. A clinical prediction model was developed by utilizing the variables most associated with HCI in a best subsets regression, which was subsequently internally validated using a Bootstrap algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 patients were identified for inclusion and 18 (5.9%) required HCI (3 operative, 15 endovascular). The median age was 70 years (IQR 54, 83), 60% had traumatic injuries, and 73% were enrolled from the emergency department. Blood product transfusion and mortality were similar between the HCI and no-HCI groups. Our analysis demonstrated that a model based on the minimum hemoglobin (9.9 vs 8.1 g/dL), minimum diastolic (57 vs 53 mm Hg) and systolic blood pressures (105 vs 90 mm Hg), and minimum respiratory rate (15 vs 18) could predict HCI with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.87, outperforming the Shock Index (SI) (AUROC = 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study of surgical ICU patients with concern for ongoing bleeding, a prediction model using serial VS and biomarkers outperformed the SI and may help identify those requiring HCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241312614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241312614","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ongoing bleeding who require hemorrhage control interventions (HCI) can be challenging. Guidelines recommend risk-stratification with clinical variables and prediction tools, however supporting evidence remains mixed.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated adult patients admitted to the surgical ICU with concern for ongoing hemorrhage under our institution's "Hemorrhage Watch" (HW) protocol and aimed to derive a clinical prediction model identifying those needing HCI with serial vital signs (VS) and serum biomarkers. The HW protocol included ICU admission followed by a 3-h observation period with VS monitoring every 15 min and hourly biomarkers. The primary outcome was the need for HCI (operative and endovascular interventions) within nine hours of ICU arrival. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, blood transfusions, and ICU and hospital length-of-stay. A clinical prediction model was developed by utilizing the variables most associated with HCI in a best subsets regression, which was subsequently internally validated using a Bootstrap algorithm.

Results: 305 patients were identified for inclusion and 18 (5.9%) required HCI (3 operative, 15 endovascular). The median age was 70 years (IQR 54, 83), 60% had traumatic injuries, and 73% were enrolled from the emergency department. Blood product transfusion and mortality were similar between the HCI and no-HCI groups. Our analysis demonstrated that a model based on the minimum hemoglobin (9.9 vs 8.1 g/dL), minimum diastolic (57 vs 53 mm Hg) and systolic blood pressures (105 vs 90 mm Hg), and minimum respiratory rate (15 vs 18) could predict HCI with an area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.87, outperforming the Shock Index (SI) (AUROC = 0.64).

Conclusions: In this study of surgical ICU patients with concern for ongoing bleeding, a prediction model using serial VS and biomarkers outperformed the SI and may help identify those requiring HCI.

生命体征和血清生物标志物的联合模型在预测外科重症监护病房患者出血控制干预措施方面优于休克指数。
背景:区分需要出血控制干预(HCI)的外科重症监护病房(ICU)持续出血患者可能具有挑战性。指南建议使用临床变量和预测工具进行风险分层,但支持证据仍然混杂。方法:本回顾性研究评估了在我院“出血观察”(HW)方案下因持续出血而入住外科ICU的成年患者,旨在通过一系列生命体征(VS)和血清生物标志物建立临床预测模型,确定需要HCI的患者。HW方案包括ICU入院,3小时观察期,每15分钟监测VS和每小时监测生物标志物。主要结局是需要在ICU到达后9小时内进行HCI(手术和血管内干预)。次要结局包括住院死亡率、输血量、ICU和住院时间。通过在最佳子集回归中利用与HCI最相关的变量建立临床预测模型,随后使用Bootstrap算法进行内部验证。结果:305例患者纳入,18例(5.9%)需要HCI(3例手术,15例血管内)。中位年龄为70岁(IQR 54,83), 60%有外伤性损伤,73%来自急诊科。输血和死亡率在HCI组和无HCI组之间相似。我们的分析表明,基于最小血红蛋白(9.9 vs 8.1 g/dL)、最小舒张压(57 vs 53 mm Hg)和收缩压(105 vs 90 mm Hg)和最小呼吸频率(15 vs 18)的模型可以预测HCI,接受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.87,优于休克指数(SI) (AUROC = 0.64)。结论:在这项对有持续出血担忧的外科ICU患者的研究中,使用系列VS和生物标志物的预测模型优于SI,可能有助于识别需要HCI的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信