Stem Cell-Based Therapies via Different Administration Route for Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Gabriella Jeanne Mulia, Novelia Anna, John Chung-Che Wu, Hon-Ping Ma, Yung-Hsiao Chiang, Ju-Chi Ou, Kai-Yun Chen
{"title":"Stem Cell-Based Therapies via Different Administration Route for Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.","authors":"Gabriella Jeanne Mulia, Novelia Anna, John Chung-Che Wu, Hon-Ping Ma, Yung-Hsiao Chiang, Ju-Chi Ou, Kai-Yun Chen","doi":"10.1177/09636897251315121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke, a neurological condition from compromised cerebral blood perfusion, remains a major global cause of mortality and disability. Conventional therapies like tissue plasminogen activator are limited by narrow therapeutic windows and potential adverse effects, highlighting the urgency for novel treatments. Stem cell-based therapies, with their neuroprotective and regenerative properties, present a promising yet highly diverse alternative. By conducting literature search and data extraction from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, this meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of stem cell-based therapies administered via intravenous (IV) and non-IV routes in 17 studies with stroke patients. Primary outcomes included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), while secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events. Results demonstrated significant improvements in NIHSS, BI, and mRS scores, particularly in non-IV groups within 6- and 12-month follow-ups, suggesting delayed but enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Mortality was reduced in both IV and non-IV groups, indicating treatment safety. Adverse events, categorized into neurological and systemic complications, showed no significant differences between intervention and control groups, further emphasizing the safety of stem cell therapies. Non-IV routes showed more long-term benefits, potentially due to enhanced cell delivery and integration. These findings demonstrate the potential of stem cell therapies to improve functional recovery and survival in stroke patients, regardless of administration route. However, the delayed response underscores the need for extended follow-up in clinical applications. Further research is required to standardize treatment protocols, optimize cell types and doses, and address patient-specific factors to integrate stem cell therapies into routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9721,"journal":{"name":"Cell Transplantation","volume":"34 ","pages":"9636897251315121"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808770/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897251315121","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke, a neurological condition from compromised cerebral blood perfusion, remains a major global cause of mortality and disability. Conventional therapies like tissue plasminogen activator are limited by narrow therapeutic windows and potential adverse effects, highlighting the urgency for novel treatments. Stem cell-based therapies, with their neuroprotective and regenerative properties, present a promising yet highly diverse alternative. By conducting literature search and data extraction from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, this meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of stem cell-based therapies administered via intravenous (IV) and non-IV routes in 17 studies with stroke patients. Primary outcomes included the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel Index (BI), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), while secondary outcomes included mortality and adverse events. Results demonstrated significant improvements in NIHSS, BI, and mRS scores, particularly in non-IV groups within 6- and 12-month follow-ups, suggesting delayed but enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Mortality was reduced in both IV and non-IV groups, indicating treatment safety. Adverse events, categorized into neurological and systemic complications, showed no significant differences between intervention and control groups, further emphasizing the safety of stem cell therapies. Non-IV routes showed more long-term benefits, potentially due to enhanced cell delivery and integration. These findings demonstrate the potential of stem cell therapies to improve functional recovery and survival in stroke patients, regardless of administration route. However, the delayed response underscores the need for extended follow-up in clinical applications. Further research is required to standardize treatment protocols, optimize cell types and doses, and address patient-specific factors to integrate stem cell therapies into routine clinical practice.

脑卒中是一种由脑血液灌流受阻引起的神经系统疾病,仍然是导致全球死亡和残疾的主要原因。组织纤溶酶原激活剂等传统疗法受限于狭窄的治疗窗口和潜在的不良反应,凸显了新型疗法的紧迫性。以干细胞为基础的疗法具有神经保护和再生特性,是一种前景广阔但种类繁多的替代疗法。通过从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库中进行文献检索和数据提取,这项荟萃分析评估了17项针对中风患者的研究中,通过静脉注射(IV)和非静脉注射途径进行的干细胞疗法的临床疗效和安全性。主要结果包括美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、巴特尔指数(BI)和改良Rankin量表(mRS),次要结果包括死亡率和不良事件。结果表明,NIHSS、BI 和 mRS 评分均有明显改善,尤其是非静脉注射组在 6 个月和 12 个月随访期间的改善更为明显,这表明疗效虽有延迟,但已得到加强。静脉注射组和非静脉注射组的死亡率均有所下降,这表明治疗是安全的。不良反应分为神经系统和全身并发症,干预组和对照组之间无明显差异,进一步强调了干细胞疗法的安全性。非静脉注射途径显示出更多长期益处,这可能是由于细胞输送和整合得到加强。这些研究结果表明,无论采用何种给药途径,干细胞疗法都有可能改善中风患者的功能恢复和存活率。然而,延迟反应强调了在临床应用中延长随访时间的必要性。要将干细胞疗法纳入常规临床实践,还需要进一步研究,以规范治疗方案,优化细胞类型和剂量,并解决患者的特定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Transplantation
Cell Transplantation 生物-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信