Sushil Selvarajan, Jisha Sara John, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran, Bhagteshwar Singh, Biju George, Joseph L. Mathew, Priscilla Rupali
{"title":"Therapeutic Versus Non-Therapeutic Dose Anticoagulation in COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials","authors":"Sushil Selvarajan, Jisha Sara John, Prathap Tharyan, Richard Kirubakaran, Bhagteshwar Singh, Biju George, Joseph L. Mathew, Priscilla Rupali","doi":"10.1002/jha2.1100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Abnormal coagulation and thrombotic complications prompted many guidelines to recommend thromboprophylaxis for patients hospitalised with COVID-19, but the dose required for prophylaxis remains unclear. This systematic review (SR) analyses the safety and efficacy of therapeutic dose anticoagulation (TDA) versus non-therapeutic dose anticoagulation (NDA) in COVID-19 patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>According to the <i>Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Review of Interventions</i>, we performed an SR. The protocol is registered in Prospero (CRD42021269197, date 12 August 2021).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this SR of 18 studies, TDA was shown to reduce all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.70, 0.99) in COVID-19 infection. TDA also reduced thrombosis (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48, 0.72) but increased major bleeding (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.29, 2.69). A stratified analysis according to severity revealed that, in non-critical patients, TDA resulted in mortality benefit (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67, 0.94). In critical patients, TDA did not affect all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18) but reduced thrombosis (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48, 0.86) and increased major bleeding (RR 1.85; 95% CI 1.06, 3.23).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>TDA significantly reduced all-cause mortality and thrombosis in non-critical COVID-19 patients at the expense of increased major bleeding. In critical COVID-19, this mortality benefit was not observed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jha2.1100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Abnormal coagulation and thrombotic complications prompted many guidelines to recommend thromboprophylaxis for patients hospitalised with COVID-19, but the dose required for prophylaxis remains unclear. This systematic review (SR) analyses the safety and efficacy of therapeutic dose anticoagulation (TDA) versus non-therapeutic dose anticoagulation (NDA) in COVID-19 patients.
Methods
According to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Review of Interventions, we performed an SR. The protocol is registered in Prospero (CRD42021269197, date 12 August 2021).
Results
In this SR of 18 studies, TDA was shown to reduce all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.70, 0.99) in COVID-19 infection. TDA also reduced thrombosis (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.48, 0.72) but increased major bleeding (RR 1.87; 95% CI 1.29, 2.69). A stratified analysis according to severity revealed that, in non-critical patients, TDA resulted in mortality benefit (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67, 0.94). In critical patients, TDA did not affect all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.89, 1.18) but reduced thrombosis (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48, 0.86) and increased major bleeding (RR 1.85; 95% CI 1.06, 3.23).
Conclusion
TDA significantly reduced all-cause mortality and thrombosis in non-critical COVID-19 patients at the expense of increased major bleeding. In critical COVID-19, this mortality benefit was not observed.
背景:凝血异常和血栓形成并发症促使许多指南推荐COVID-19住院患者进行血栓预防,但预防所需的剂量仍不清楚。本系统综述(SR)分析了治疗剂量抗凝(TDA)与非治疗剂量抗凝(NDA)在COVID-19患者中的安全性和有效性。方法根据Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册,我们进行了一项sr。该方案在Prospero注册(CRD42021269197,日期为2021年8月12日)。结果在这18项研究中,TDA可降低全因死亡率(风险比[RR] 0.83;95%可信区间[95% CI] 0.70, 0.99)。TDA还能减少血栓形成(RR 0.55;95% CI 0.48, 0.72),但大出血增加(RR 1.87;95% ci 1.29, 2.69)。根据严重程度进行的分层分析显示,在非危重患者中,TDA导致死亡率获益(RR 0.79;95% ci 0.67, 0.94)。在危重患者中,TDA不影响全因死亡率(RR 1.03;95% CI 0.89, 1.18),但血栓形成减少(RR 0.65;95% CI 0.48, 0.86)和大出血增加(RR 1.85;95% ci 1.06, 3.23)。结论TDA可显著降低非危重型COVID-19患者的全因死亡率和血栓形成,但会增加大出血。在危重型COVID-19中,没有观察到这种死亡率益处。