Impact of ultra-processed meat products on human health: Review and outlook

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Dan Yang, Chengpu Chen, Di Zhao, Chunbao Li
{"title":"Impact of ultra-processed meat products on human health: Review and outlook","authors":"Dan Yang,&nbsp;Chengpu Chen,&nbsp;Di Zhao,&nbsp;Chunbao Li","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern diets are increasingly dominated by ultra-processed foods, a shift driven by urbanization and lifestyle changes. Among these, ultra-processed meat products (UPMPs) are particularly popular due to their appealing flavor and texture. However, emerging evidence highlights potential health risks associated with UPMPs. Although meat products are rich in high-quality proteins, the processing methods used in UPMPs can affect protein digestibility. Moderate processing techniques, such as sous-vide cooking, fermentation, and enzymatic tenderization, can enhance digestion and nutrient absorption, whereas excessive processing may lead to protein aggregation and cross-linking, reducing protein digestibility. Additionally, the overuse of additives and excessive thermal processing are key concerns in UPMP production, leading to the formation of potentially harmful substances, including acrylamide, heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and advanced glycation end products. This review examines how different processing techniques influence protein digestibility in UPMPs, elucidates the pathways through which harmful substances are generated, and assesses the impact of UPMPs on gut health, with a focus on gut microbiota and the colon. Our synthesis of current research indicates that excessive consumption of UPMPs contributes to gut microbiota dysbiosis, compromises the gut barrier, and increases the risk of colorectal cancer, though the dose-dependent effects require further clarification. Future research should focus on key parameters of moderate processing, explore natural alternatives to harmful additives, examine the dose–response relationship between UPMP consumption and health risks, and evaluate how individual factors, such as genetics and metabolism, influence the health impacts of UPMPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70040","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern diets are increasingly dominated by ultra-processed foods, a shift driven by urbanization and lifestyle changes. Among these, ultra-processed meat products (UPMPs) are particularly popular due to their appealing flavor and texture. However, emerging evidence highlights potential health risks associated with UPMPs. Although meat products are rich in high-quality proteins, the processing methods used in UPMPs can affect protein digestibility. Moderate processing techniques, such as sous-vide cooking, fermentation, and enzymatic tenderization, can enhance digestion and nutrient absorption, whereas excessive processing may lead to protein aggregation and cross-linking, reducing protein digestibility. Additionally, the overuse of additives and excessive thermal processing are key concerns in UPMP production, leading to the formation of potentially harmful substances, including acrylamide, heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and advanced glycation end products. This review examines how different processing techniques influence protein digestibility in UPMPs, elucidates the pathways through which harmful substances are generated, and assesses the impact of UPMPs on gut health, with a focus on gut microbiota and the colon. Our synthesis of current research indicates that excessive consumption of UPMPs contributes to gut microbiota dysbiosis, compromises the gut barrier, and increases the risk of colorectal cancer, though the dose-dependent effects require further clarification. Future research should focus on key parameters of moderate processing, explore natural alternatives to harmful additives, examine the dose–response relationship between UPMP consumption and health risks, and evaluate how individual factors, such as genetics and metabolism, influence the health impacts of UPMPs.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信