Determining the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence After Kidney Transplantation: A Descriptive Correlational Study
{"title":"Determining the Relationship Between Perceived Social Support and Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence After Kidney Transplantation: A Descriptive Correlational Study","authors":"Ebru Karazeybek","doi":"10.1111/jep.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>What is known about how the level of social support, which is among the factors affecting medication adherence, affects medication adherence is limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study investigated the relationship between perceived social support and immunosuppressive medication adherence among kidney recipients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted using a descriptive correlational research method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>The study conducted research with 168 kidney transplant recipients who agreed to participate between April and June 2021. Participants completed the Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence Scale (IMAS) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Participants had a mean IMAS and MSPSS score of 50.24 ± 3.71 and 57.21 ± 13.96, respectively. Participants' MSPSS total (<i>r</i> = 0.209, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and ‘family’ (<i>r</i> = 0.248, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and ‘friends’ (<i>r</i> = 0.226, <i>p</i> = 0.003) subscale scores were weakly and positively correlated with their IMAS total score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the effect of perceived social support on immunosuppressive medication adherence is important for designing future interventions to increase immunosuppressive medication adherence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
What is known about how the level of social support, which is among the factors affecting medication adherence, affects medication adherence is limited.
Objectives
This study investigated the relationship between perceived social support and immunosuppressive medication adherence among kidney recipients.
Design
This study was conducted using a descriptive correlational research method.
Participants
The study conducted research with 168 kidney transplant recipients who agreed to participate between April and June 2021. Participants completed the Immunosuppressive Medication Adherence Scale (IMAS) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).
Measurements and Results
Participants had a mean IMAS and MSPSS score of 50.24 ± 3.71 and 57.21 ± 13.96, respectively. Participants' MSPSS total (r = 0.209, p = 0.006) and ‘family’ (r = 0.248, p = 0.001) and ‘friends’ (r = 0.226, p = 0.003) subscale scores were weakly and positively correlated with their IMAS total score.
Conclusion
Understanding the effect of perceived social support on immunosuppressive medication adherence is important for designing future interventions to increase immunosuppressive medication adherence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.