Assessing the Indirect Nexus Between Green Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behavior: A Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach

IF 4.8 Q1 BUSINESS
Shah Ridwan Chowdhury, Md Asadul Islam, Souman Guha, Mahfuzur Rahman, Nehad Laila Sanju
{"title":"Assessing the Indirect Nexus Between Green Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behavior: A Fuzzy DEMATEL Approach","authors":"Shah Ridwan Chowdhury,&nbsp;Md Asadul Islam,&nbsp;Souman Guha,&nbsp;Mahfuzur Rahman,&nbsp;Nehad Laila Sanju","doi":"10.1002/bsd2.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Green human resource management (GHRM) has become a proactive strategy to develop an ecological platform in the private sector. Because of stakeholder pressures and regulations, organizations are required to adopt and implement GHRM practices. Current literature indicates that various intervening mechanisms may intensify the role of GHRM practices on employee green behavior (EGB). However, there is a paucity of studies that assessed the role of multiple mediators based on inter-assessment and prioritization to guide organizations in developing GHRM strategies. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature by examining 10 mediators identified from the literature and recommending the most influential ones based on expert opinions. Furthermore, to address the vagueness of human perceptions of GHRM practices, this study applied the fuzzy set theory and the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method to obtain and analyze expert opinions. The analysis has revealed three key influential mediators out of nine that can positively influence the indirect nexus between GHRM practices and EGB. These three key mediators have the highest prominence and influential scores include environmental strategy (M7), employee environmental commitment (M2), and green organizational culture (M3). The originality of the paper lies in its theoretical, practical, contextual, and methodological contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36531,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and Development","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bsd2.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bsd2.70075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green human resource management (GHRM) has become a proactive strategy to develop an ecological platform in the private sector. Because of stakeholder pressures and regulations, organizations are required to adopt and implement GHRM practices. Current literature indicates that various intervening mechanisms may intensify the role of GHRM practices on employee green behavior (EGB). However, there is a paucity of studies that assessed the role of multiple mediators based on inter-assessment and prioritization to guide organizations in developing GHRM strategies. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature by examining 10 mediators identified from the literature and recommending the most influential ones based on expert opinions. Furthermore, to address the vagueness of human perceptions of GHRM practices, this study applied the fuzzy set theory and the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method to obtain and analyze expert opinions. The analysis has revealed three key influential mediators out of nine that can positively influence the indirect nexus between GHRM practices and EGB. These three key mediators have the highest prominence and influential scores include environmental strategy (M7), employee environmental commitment (M2), and green organizational culture (M3). The originality of the paper lies in its theoretical, practical, contextual, and methodological contributions.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Strategy and Development
Business Strategy and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信