An integrated approach to assessing the quality of sediments in the Great Backa and Bega canals, Serbia

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Tanja Tomić, Tamara Jurca, Dunja Rađenović Veselić, Nataša Slijepčević, Dejan Krčmar, Milena Bečelić-Tomin, Dragana Tomašević Pilipović
{"title":"An integrated approach to assessing the quality of sediments in the Great Backa and Bega canals, Serbia","authors":"Tanja Tomić,&nbsp;Tamara Jurca,&nbsp;Dunja Rađenović Veselić,&nbsp;Nataša Slijepčević,&nbsp;Dejan Krčmar,&nbsp;Milena Bečelić-Tomin,&nbsp;Dragana Tomašević Pilipović","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01058-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To improve the process of achieving good ecological and chemical status of waters, it is proposed that issues regarding the sediment in water bodies be incorporated in national and international river basin management programs. For a more realistic sediment quality assessment, multidimensional approaches that include various methods are preferred. The northern part of Serbia has an intertwined network of canals that receive untreated industrial and municipal wastewaters and pollution from the surrounding agricultural land. This leads to the accumulation of large amounts of sediments with varying quality in the canals. To assess the quality of the Great Backa and Bega canal sediments, an analysis based on chemical, ecological and ecotoxicological methods was conducted and the sediment quality triad approach was applied. Ecotoxicological data was obtained in a battery of tests on standard organisms belonging to different trophic levels in various exposure scenarios. Sediment contact tests on <i>Myriophyllum aquaticum</i>, immobilization tests on <i>Daphnia magna</i> (in water–sediment and elutriates) and <i>Allivibrio fischeri</i> bioluminescence tests (in elutriates) were performed. In addition, a small-scale accumulation test of potentially toxic elements on exposed plants was conducted.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Responses of test organisms in the Great Backa samples were in line with the results of chemical analysis or stronger, while the analysis of aquatic macroinvertebrates reflected bad ecological potential of the canal. The Bega samples were highly contaminated and the ecological potential of the canal was graded as bad, but the ecotoxicological tests did not reveal high toxicity of samples. Plants exposed to samples from both canals took in metals, but inhibition of growth was detected only in the Great Backa samples, while the growth in the Bega samples was stimulated. The principal component analysis revealed no significant correlation between organism responses and results of chemical analysis. Based on the SQT applied, there is a likelihood of adverse effects posed by sediments from both canals.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ecotoxicological tests complemented the commonly applied methods for sediment quality evaluation. The triad approach applied with the addition of the accumulation test contributed to a more ecologically relevant sediment quality assessment. Results indicated that remediation, dredging or mitigation measures are required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01058-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01058-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To improve the process of achieving good ecological and chemical status of waters, it is proposed that issues regarding the sediment in water bodies be incorporated in national and international river basin management programs. For a more realistic sediment quality assessment, multidimensional approaches that include various methods are preferred. The northern part of Serbia has an intertwined network of canals that receive untreated industrial and municipal wastewaters and pollution from the surrounding agricultural land. This leads to the accumulation of large amounts of sediments with varying quality in the canals. To assess the quality of the Great Backa and Bega canal sediments, an analysis based on chemical, ecological and ecotoxicological methods was conducted and the sediment quality triad approach was applied. Ecotoxicological data was obtained in a battery of tests on standard organisms belonging to different trophic levels in various exposure scenarios. Sediment contact tests on Myriophyllum aquaticum, immobilization tests on Daphnia magna (in water–sediment and elutriates) and Allivibrio fischeri bioluminescence tests (in elutriates) were performed. In addition, a small-scale accumulation test of potentially toxic elements on exposed plants was conducted.

Results

Responses of test organisms in the Great Backa samples were in line with the results of chemical analysis or stronger, while the analysis of aquatic macroinvertebrates reflected bad ecological potential of the canal. The Bega samples were highly contaminated and the ecological potential of the canal was graded as bad, but the ecotoxicological tests did not reveal high toxicity of samples. Plants exposed to samples from both canals took in metals, but inhibition of growth was detected only in the Great Backa samples, while the growth in the Bega samples was stimulated. The principal component analysis revealed no significant correlation between organism responses and results of chemical analysis. Based on the SQT applied, there is a likelihood of adverse effects posed by sediments from both canals.

Conclusions

Ecotoxicological tests complemented the commonly applied methods for sediment quality evaluation. The triad approach applied with the addition of the accumulation test contributed to a more ecologically relevant sediment quality assessment. Results indicated that remediation, dredging or mitigation measures are required.

评估塞尔维亚大巴卡和贝加运河沉积物质量的综合方法
为了促进实现良好的水体生态和化学状态,建议将水体泥沙问题纳入国家和国际流域管理规划。为了更真实地评价沉积物质量,包括多种方法的多维方法是首选的。塞尔维亚北部有一个错综复杂的运河网络,接收未经处理的工业和城市废水以及周围农田的污染。这导致大量不同质量的沉积物在运河中堆积。采用化学、生态学和生态毒理学方法对大巴卡和贝加运河沉积物质量进行了综合评价,并采用了沉积物质量三元分析法。生态毒理学数据是在对不同暴露情景下属于不同营养水平的标准生物体进行的一系列试验中获得的。对水生肉豆藻进行了沉积物接触试验,对大水蚤(在水-沉积物和洗脱液中)进行了固定化试验,并对费氏Allivibrio fischeri进行了生物发光试验。此外,还进行了暴露植物潜在有毒元素的小规模积累试验。结果大背运河样品中受试生物的反应与化学分析结果基本一致或较强,而水生大型无脊椎动物的分析则反映出运河生态潜力较差。Bega样品为重度污染,运河生态潜力为不良,但生态毒理学试验未显示样品具有高毒性。暴露在两条运河样品中的植物都吸收了金属,但只在大巴卡样品中发现了生长抑制,而在贝加样品中发现了生长刺激。主成分分析显示生物反应与化学分析结果无显著相关性。根据所应用的标准时间,两条运河的沉积物可能会造成不利影响。结论二级毒理学试验是常用的沉积物质量评价方法的补充。加了累积试验的三合一方法有助于更符合生态的泥沙质量评价。结果表明,需要采取补救、疏浚或缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信