A comparative study between deep learning approaches for aphid classification

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Brenda Slongo Taca;Douglas Lau;Rafael Rieder
{"title":"A comparative study between deep learning approaches for aphid classification","authors":"Brenda Slongo Taca;Douglas Lau;Rafael Rieder","doi":"10.1109/TLA.2025.10879193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a performance comparison between two convolutional neural networks in the task of detecting aphids in digital images: AphidCV, customized for counting, classifying, and measuring aphids, and YOLOv8, state-of-the-art in real-time object detection. Our work considered 48,000 images for training for six different insect species (8,000 images divided into four classes), in addition to data augmentation techniques. For comparative purposes, we considered evaluation metrics available to both architectures (Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score) and additional metrics (ROC Curve and PR AUC for AphidCV; mAP50 and mAP50-95 for YOLOv8). The results revealed an average F1-Score=0.891 for the AphidCV architecture, version 3.0, and an average F1-Score=0.882 for the YOLOv8, medium version, demonstrating the effectiveness of both architectures for training aphid detection models. Overall, AphidCV performed slightly better for the majority of metrics and species in the study, serving its design purpose very well. YOLOv8 proved to be faster to converge the models, with the potential to apply in research considering many aphid species.","PeriodicalId":55024,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Latin America Transactions","volume":"23 3","pages":"198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10879193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Latin America Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10879193/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a performance comparison between two convolutional neural networks in the task of detecting aphids in digital images: AphidCV, customized for counting, classifying, and measuring aphids, and YOLOv8, state-of-the-art in real-time object detection. Our work considered 48,000 images for training for six different insect species (8,000 images divided into four classes), in addition to data augmentation techniques. For comparative purposes, we considered evaluation metrics available to both architectures (Accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score) and additional metrics (ROC Curve and PR AUC for AphidCV; mAP50 and mAP50-95 for YOLOv8). The results revealed an average F1-Score=0.891 for the AphidCV architecture, version 3.0, and an average F1-Score=0.882 for the YOLOv8, medium version, demonstrating the effectiveness of both architectures for training aphid detection models. Overall, AphidCV performed slightly better for the majority of metrics and species in the study, serving its design purpose very well. YOLOv8 proved to be faster to converge the models, with the potential to apply in research considering many aphid species.
蚜虫分类的深度学习方法比较研究
本研究展示了两种卷积神经网络在检测数字图像中的蚜虫任务中的性能比较:用于计数、分类和测量蚜虫的AphidCV和用于实时目标检测的最先进的YOLOv8。除了数据增强技术外,我们的工作还考虑了48,000张用于训练六种不同昆虫物种的图像(8,000张图像分为四类)。出于比较目的,我们考虑了两种体系结构可用的评估指标(准确性、精密度、召回率和F1-Score)和其他指标(AphidCV的ROC曲线和PR AUC;mAP50和mAP50-95的YOLOv8)。结果显示,3.0版本的AphidCV架构的平均F1-Score=0.891,中等版本的YOLOv8架构的平均F1-Score=0.882,证明了这两种架构在训练蚜虫检测模型方面的有效性。总体而言,AphidCV在研究中的大多数指标和物种上表现略好,很好地服务于其设计目的。YOLOv8被证明可以更快地收敛模型,具有应用于考虑多种蚜虫种类的研究的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Latin America Transactions
IEEE Latin America Transactions COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Latin America Transactions (IEEE LATAM) is an interdisciplinary journal focused on the dissemination of original and quality research papers / review articles in Spanish and Portuguese of emerging topics in three main areas: Computing, Electric Energy and Electronics. Some of the sub-areas of the journal are, but not limited to: Automatic control, communications, instrumentation, artificial intelligence, power and industrial electronics, fault diagnosis and detection, transportation electrification, internet of things, electrical machines, circuits and systems, biomedicine and biomedical / haptic applications, secure communications, robotics, sensors and actuators, computer networks, smart grids, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信